As the diffstat shows, HLSL_CLASS_OBJECT does not really have much in common.
Resource types (TEXTURE, SAMPLER, UAV) sometimes behave similarly to each other,
but do not generally behave similarly to effect-specific types (string, shader,
state, view). Most consumers of HLSL_CLASS_OBJECT subsequently check the base
type anyway.
Hence we want to replace HLSL_TYPE_* with individual classes for object types.
As a first step, change the last few places that only check HLSL_CLASS_OBJECT.
d3dcompiler and d3dx9 versions before 42 don't emit this error; this will be
necessary to emulate that behaviour.
Other warnings exist that are introduced in different d3dcompiler versions,
although there are not very many distinct HLSL warnings to begin with.
We could of course group all these together under a single compiler option, but
I find that using separate top-level options is unilaterally friendlier to an
API consumer, and simpler to implement as well. It also in some sense maps
conceptually to e.g. "-Wno-implicit-conversion".
Properly passing the inverse-trig.shader_test tests whose qualifiers
have been removed requires making spirv.c capable of handling ABS.
The same happens for the ps_3_0 equality test in
float-comparison.shader_test.
libs/vkd3d-shader/hlsl.c: In function ‘declare_predefined_types’:
libs/vkd3d-shader/hlsl.c:3408:10: warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
{"technique", 9},
^~~~~~~~~~~
...
programs/vkd3d-compiler/main.c: In function ‘parse_formatting’:
programs/vkd3d-compiler/main.c:303:10: warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
{"colour", VKD3D_SHADER_COMPILE_OPTION_FORMATTING_COLOUR},
^~~~~~~~
...
macOS tigetstr() takes a non-const char *, so account for that as well.
Co-authored-by: Giovanni Mascellani <gmascellani@codeweavers.com>
These may happen when storing to structured buffers, and we are not
handling them properly yet. The included test reaches unreacheable code
before this patch.
Storing to buffers is complicated since we need to split the index
chain in two paths:
- The path within the variable where the resource is.
- The subpath to the part of the resource element that is being stored
to.
For now, we will emit a fixme when the index chain in the lhs is not a
direct resource access.
The choice to store them in an rbtree was made early on. It does not seem likely
that HLSL programs would define many overloads for any of their functions, but I
suspect the idea was rather that intrinsics would be defined as plain
hlsl_ir_function_decl structures [cf. 447463e590]
and that some intrinsics that could operate on any type would therefore need
many overrides.
This is not how we deal with intrinsics, however. When the first intrinsics were
implemented I made the choice disregard this intended design, and instead match
and convert their types manually, in C. Nothing that has happened in the time
since has led me to question that choice, and in fact, the flexibility with
which we must accommodate functions has led me to believe that matching in this
way was definitely the right choice. The main other designs I see would have
been:
* define each intrinsic variant separately using existing HLSL types. Besides
efficiency concerns (i.e. this would take more space in memory, and would take
longer to generate each variant), the normal type-matching rules don't really
apply to intrinsics.
[For example: elementwise intrinsics like abs() return the same type as the
input, including preserving the distinction between float and float1. It is
legal to define separate HLSL overloads taking float and float1, but trying to
invoke these functions yields an "ambiguous function call" error.]
* introduce new (semi-)generic types. This is far more code and ends up acting
like our current scheme (with helpers) in a slightly more complex form.
So I think we can go ahead and rip out this vestige of the original design for
intrinsics.
As for why to change it: rbtrees are simply more complex to deal with, and it
seems unlikely to me that the difference is going to matter. I do not expect any
program to define large quantities of intrinsics; linked list search should be
good enough.
So that they are dumped even if parsing fails, which is a circumstance
in which one likely wants to see the problematic shader.
The downside of that is that for shader types other than HLSL
the profile is not written any more in the filename. This should
not be a big problem, because in those cases the shader describes
its own type.
When dumping an HLSL shader, the id is brought in front of the profile
in the file name, in order to make it more tab-friendly: when dealing
with a directory full of shaders it's likely that the id determines
the profile, but the other way around.
