At the current moment this is a little odd because for SM1 [test]
directives are skipped, and the [shader] directives are not executed by
the shader_runner_vulkan.c:compile_shader() but by the general
shader_runner.c:compile_shader(). So in principle it is a little weird
that we go through the vulkan runner.
But fret not, because in the future we plan to make the parser agnostic
to the language of the tests, so we will get rid of the general
shader_runner.c:compile_shader() function and instead call a
runner->compile_shader() function, defined for each runner. Granted,
most of these may call a generic implementation that uses native
compiler in Windows, and vkd3d-shader on Linux, but it would be more
conceptually correct.
Wine-Bug: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56162
Storing to a vector component using a non-constant index is not allowed
on profiles lower than 6.0. Unless this happens inside a loop that can be
unrolled, which we are not doing yet.
For this reason, a validate_nonconstant_vector_store_derefs pass is
added to detect these cases.
Ideally we would want to emit an hlsl_error on this pass, but before
implementing loop unrolling, we could reach this point on valid HLSL.
Also, as pointed out by Nikolay in the mentioned bug, currently
new_offset_from_path_index() fails an assertion when this happens,
because it expects an hlsl_ir_constant, so a check is added.
It also felt correct to emit an hlsl_fixme there, despite the
redundancy.
This preempts us from replacing a swizzle incorrectly, as in the
following example:
1: A.x = 1.0
2: A
3: A.x = 2.0
4: @2.x
were @4 ends up being 2.0 instead of 1.0, because that's the value stored in
A.x at time 4, and we should be querying it at time 2.
This also helps us to avoid replacing a swizzle with itself in copy-prop
which can result in infinite loops, as with the included tests this commit.
Consider the following sequence of instructions:
1 : A
2 : B = @1
3 : B
4 : A = @3
5 : @1.x
Current copy-prop would replace 5 so it points to @3 now:
1 : A
2 : B = @1
3 : B
4 : A = @3
5 : @3.x
But in the next iteration it would make it point back to @1, keeping it
spinning infinitively.
The solution is to index the instructions and don't replace the swizzle
if the new load happens after the current load.
The included test fails because copy_propagation_transform_swizzle()
is using the value recorded for the variable when the swizzle is being
read, and not the swizzle's load.
