If the offset of a gather resource load can be represented as an
aoffimmi (vectori of ints from -8 to 7), use one.
This is of particular importance for 4.0 profiles, where this is the only
valid way of representing offsets for this operation.
If a hlsl_ir_load loads a variable whose components are stored from different
instructions, copy propagation doesn't replace it.
But if all these instructions are constants (which currently is the case
for value constructors), the load could be replaced with a constant value.
Which is expected in some other instructions, e.g. texel_offsets when
using aoffimmi modifiers.
For instance, this shader:
```
sampler s;
Texture2D t;
float4 main() : sv_target
{
return t.Gather(s, float2(0.6, 0.6), int2(0, 0));
}
```
results in the following IR before applying the patch:
```
float | 6.00000024e-01
float | 6.00000024e-01
uint | 0
| = (<constructor-2>[@4].x @2)
uint | 1
| = (<constructor-2>[@6].x @3)
float2 | <constructor-2>
int | 0
int | 0
uint | 0
| = (<constructor-5>[@11].x @9)
uint | 1
| = (<constructor-5>[@13].x @10)
int2 | <constructor-5>
float4 | gather_red(resource = t, sampler = s, coords = @8, offset = @15)
| return
| = (<output-sv_target0> @16)
```
and this IR afterwards:
```
float2 | {6.00000024e-01 6.00000024e-01 }
int2 | {0 0 }
float4 | gather_red(resource = t, sampler = s, coords = @2, offset = @3)
| return
| = (<output-sv_target0> @4)
```
Rename it to copy_propagation_replace_with_single_instr() accordingly.
The idea is to introduce a constant vector replacement pass which will do the
same thing.
copy_propagation_compute_replacement() is not doing very much for us, and
conceptually is a bit of an odd fit anyway, since it's meant to deal with
multi-component types.
