Using add_unary_arithmetic_expr() instead of hlsl_new_unary_expr()
allows the intrinsic to work with matrices.
Otherwise we get:
E5017: Aborting due to not yet implemented feature: Copying from unsupported node type.
because an HLSL_IR_EXPR reaches split_matrix_copies().
Some intrinsics have different rules for the allowed data types than
expressions:
- Vectors and matrices at the same time are not allowed, regardless of
their dimensions. Even if they have the same number of components.
- Any combination of matrices is always allowed, even those when no
matrix fits inside another, e.g.:
float2x3 is compatible with float3x2, resulting in float 2x2.
The common data type is the min on each dimension.
This is the case for max, pow, ldexp, clamp and smoothstep; which suggest that
it is the case for all intrinsics where the operation is applied element-wise.
Tests for mul() are also added as a counter-example where the operation
is not element-wise.
Until vkd3d-shader is patched, an atomic op on a typed buffer where
StorageImageReadWithoutFormat is available will cause SPIR-V validation
failure, and assertion in Mesa debug builds, because the image will be
declared with Unknown format.
Otherwise, for instance, the added test results in:
debug_hlsl_writemask: Assertion `!(writemask & ~VKD3DSP_WRITEMASK_ALL)' failed.
Which happens in allocate_variable_temp_register() when the variable's
type reg_size is <= 4 but its component count is larger, which may
happen if it contains objects.
Do not rely on a draw or dispatch command to do this.
This allows more efficiently testing syntax, in cases where testing the actual
shader functionality is not interesting.
Otherwise the test fails on a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GPU.
The error being:
shader_runner:535:Section [test], line 9: Test failed: Got {2.72165507e-01, 4.08248246e-01, 5.44331014e-01, 6.80413783e-01}, expected {2.72165537e-01, 4.08248305e-01, 5.44331074e-01, 6.80413842e-01} at (0, 0).
This should silence warnings about some branches non returning any value
without requiring additional "return 0" statement or similar.
Also, in theory this might enable to compiler to optimize the program
a little bit more, though that's unlikely to have any measurable effect.
