Add a new test to make sure the xfs_db path command works the way the
author thinks it should.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Non-partitionable devices, like zoned block devices, aren't showing
up in in /proc/partitions and therefore we cannot rely on it to get
a device's size.
Use blockdev --getsz to get the block device size.
Cc: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test that if we set a capability on a file but not on the next files we
create, send/receive operations only apply the capability to the first
file, the one for which we have set a capability.
This is motivated by a regression that started to happen with kernel 5.8,
caused by an incompatibility between kernel commit 89efda52e6b693
("btrfs: send: emit file capabilities after chown") and a workaround for
send/receive added to btrfs-progs several years ago by btrfs-progs
commit 123a2a085027e ("btrfs-progs: receive: restore capabilities after
chown"). That workaround in btrfs-progs was added in btrfs-progs 4.1.
That kernel commit ended up fixing the bugs the btrfs-progs commit
targeted, as well as other bugs around btrfs send and capabilities.
However it did not play nice with the btrfs-progs workaround.
The kernel fix was backported to all stable kernels and the btrfs-progs
workaround was later removed from btrfs-progs by commit 81d8ea9346c6ee
("btrfs-progs: receive: remove workaround for setting capabilities"),
introduced in btrfs-progs 5.11.
The test currently fails on any environment using kernel 5.8+ and a
btrfs-progs version between 4.1 and 5.10. Updating btrfs-progs to
version 5.11 makes the test pass.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
wenli xie reported a buffer cache deadlock when an overlayfs is mounted
atop xfs and overlayfs tries to replace a single-nlink file with a
whiteout file. This test reproduces that deadlock.
Reported-by: wenli xie <wlxie7296@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Combine these two helpers into a single generic function so that we can
use it in the next patch to test a regression when running overlayfs
atop xfs.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Add a couple of regression tests for "xfs: make sure the rt allocator
doesn't run off the end" and "xfs: ensure that fpunch, fcollapse, and
finsert operations are aligned to rt extent size".
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Casefold rename test should check if renaming a file to an equivalent
name fails as expect (e.g. renaming from "file.txt" to "FILE.TXT") and
`mv` correctly identifies that those names refers to the same file.
Currently, the test doesn't do what is expected given that it doesn't
have the file to be renamed, and `mv` returns "No such file or
directory". Fix that by creating test files and checking the correct
output.
Fixes: 12b7dddbc2 ("generic: Add tests for filename casefolding feature")
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Escape SCRATCH_DEV variable so it prints its name, instead of printing
the value. If the value is "", the error message will not be very
informative.
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
The device name of a secondary storage device isn't all that important,
but the size is.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Create fifos when populating the scratch filesystem for completeness.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
I just noticed that the fs population helper creates a chardev file
"S_IFBLK" on the scratch filesystem. This seems bogus (particularly
since we actually also create a chardev named S_IFCHR) so fix up the
mknod calls.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Update both of these tests to filter out the new error messages from
repair when the inode btree counter feature is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Verify that warnings about deprecated mount options are properly
printed.
Verify that no excessive warnings are printed during remounts.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
This test verifies that XFS does not cause inode fork's extent count to
overflow when swapping forks across two files.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
This test verifies that XFS does not cause inode fork's extent count to
overflow when remapping extents from one file's inode fork to another.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
This test verifies that XFS does not cause inode fork's extent count to
overflow when writing to/funshare-ing a shared extent.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
This test verifies that XFS does not cause inode fork's extent count to
overflow when writing to an unwritten extent.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
This test verifies that XFS does not cause inode fork's extent count to
overflow when adding/removing directory entries.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
This test verifies that XFS does not cause inode fork's extent count to
overflow when adding/removing xattrs.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
This test verifies that XFS does not cause inode fork's extent count to
overflow when punching out an extent.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
Verify that XFS does not cause realtime bitmap/summary inode fork's
extent count to overflow when growing the realtime volume associated
with a filesystem.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
This test verifies that XFS does not cause inode fork's extent count to
overflow when adding a single extent while there's no possibility of splitting
an existing mapping.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
This commit adds a helper function to obtain the value of a particular field
of an inode's fsxattr fields.
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>