Otherwise we may create nodes of different dimensions than the ones we
are replacing.
"count" is the number of components of the source deref (without
considering the swizzle), while "instr_component_count" is the actual
number of components of the instruction to be replaced.
Prevent them from being ever looked up.
Our naming scheme for synthetic variables already effectively prevents this, but
this is better for clarity. We also will need to be able to move some named
variables into a dummy scope to account for complexities around function
definition and declarations.
Reinterpret min16float, min10float, min16int, min12int, and min16uint
as their regular counterparts: float, float, int, int, uint,
respectively.
A proper implementation would require adding minimum precision
indicators to all the dxbc-tpf instructions that use these types.
Consider the output of fxc 10.1 with the following shader:
uniform int i;
float4 main() : sv_target
{
min16float4 a = {0, 1, 2, i};
min16int2 b = {4, i};
min10float3 c = {6.4, 7, i};
min12int d = 9.4;
min16uint4x2 e = {14.4, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, i};
return mul(e, b) + a + c.xyzx + d;
}
However, if the graphics driver doesn't have minimum precision support,
it ignores the minimum precision indicators and runs at 32-bit
precision, which is equivalent as working with regular types.
We have a different system of generating intrinsics, which makes it easier to
deal with "polymorphic" arithmetic functions.
Defining and storing intrinsics as hlsl_ir_function_decls would also require
more space in memory (and more optimization passes to get rid of the parameter
variables), and doesn't really save us any effort in terms of source code.
