The two branches do essentially the same thing, but in different
ways and each one omitting different details. In particular there
is no need to discriminate on whether the register is a relative
address, we can just copy the NULL pointer.
The hull shader control point normalisation pass already ensures
that output registers in the control point phase have two
indices (the control point index and the register index).
Consistent with how D3DXFindShaderComment() allows looking up comments
by tag. This also makes it a little easier to move CTAB generation out
of d3dbc.c.
It makes the code quite longer, but also easier to read and extend
with further properties.
A (desirable) side effect of this commit is that it is checked
whether I/O register types are legal depending on the shader type
and phase, while before that was assumed.
This commit introduces enum vsir_io_reg_type and enum vsir_phase
which shadow enum vkd3d_shader_register_type and enum
vkd3d_shader_opcode, with the goal of making the data tables
smaller.
Adjust the algorithm for deciding for which profiles to test compilation.
We first ensure that if the compilation result changes (most often as the result
of a feature introduced in a specific version), we test the versions immediately
on either side of the change, to validate that vkd3d-shader is emulating the
same version behaviour.
We then ensure that we are testing at least one version from each set of sm1,
sm4, and sm6.
Mainly in order to not waste time compile-testing the same version
more than once [as we do with e.g. the d3d11 and d3d12 runners, or
d3d12, GL, and Vulkan].
When a shader fails to compile for a range of versions, we want to validate that
we are correctly implementing that behaviour. E.g. if a feature requires shader
model 5.0, we should validate that it compiles correctly with 5.0 (which we do),
but also that it *fails* to compile with 4.1 (which we do not).
The obvious and simple solution is to simply run compile tests for each version.
There are, however, at least 12 versions of HLSL up to and including 6.0, at
least 10 of which are known to introduce new features. Shader compilation takes
about 10-15% of the time that draw and dispatch does, both for native and
(currently) vkd3d. Testing every version for every shader would add a
noticeable amount of time to the tests.
In practice, the interesting versions to test for most shaders are:
* At least one from each range 1-3, 4-5, and 6. It's common enough for the
semantics of the HLSL to differ between bytecode formats, or for features to
be added or removed across those boundaries.
* If the shader requires a given feature, we want to test both sides of the cusp
to ensure we're requiring the same version for the feature.
In practice this is 3 or 4 versions, which is measurably less than the 12 we'd
otherwise be running.
In order to achieve this goal of testing only the 3 or 4 interesting versions
for a shader, we need to know what version is actually required for a feature.
This is encoded in the shader itself using e.g. [pixel shader fail(sm<5)].
This patch therefore implements the first step towards this goal, namely,
determining which versions succeed and fail, so we can figure out which ones are
interesting.
We could require the test writer to specify which versions are interesting ahead
of time (e.g. "for version in 2.0 4.1 5.0 6.0") but this is both redundant (and
there are a *lot* of tests that need some feature gate) and easy for a test
writer to get wrong by missing interesting versions.
Sometimes SM1-3 shaders contain write masks that exceed the
signature element masks. That happens because SM1-3 shaders do not
have a concept of signature and signature masks, and OTOH aren't
always able to express any given write mask.
In VSIR we don't want to deal with I/O register masks exceeding the
corresponding signature element mask or usage mask, because, for
instance, for higher shader models it can complicate dealing with
DCL_INDEX_RANGE. In order to have uniform rules for all shader
models we normalise masks coming from SM1-3 shaders.
We don't do that normalisation when disassembling, in order to
preserve the expected output.
The previous names "not normalised" and "fully normalised" have meanings
which are likely to change with time. OTOH including a description of the
normalisation level in the enumerant seems excessive. Relating
normalisation levels to shader model versions might be a reasonable
compromise.
