When the user clears the sync-pause flag, and sync stays in pause
state, give hints to the user, why it still is in pause state.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
The "lazy writeout" of cleared bitmap pages happens during resync, and
should happen again once the resync finishes cleanly, or is aborted.
If resync finished cleanly, or was aborted because of peer disk
failure, we trigger the writeout from worker context in the after
state change work.
If resync was aborted because of connection failure, we should not
immediately trigger bitmap writeout, but rather postpone the
writeout to after the connection cleanup happened. We now do it
in the receiver context from drbd_disconnect().
If resync was aborted because of local disk failure, well, there
is nothing to write to anymore.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
This is a minor optimization and cleanup,
and also considerably reduces some harmless (but noisy) race with
the connection cleanup code.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
The assert in drbd_req.c:755 forces us to have only requests of
one kind in an epoch. The two kinds we distinguish here are:
local-only or mirrored.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Protocol A has no P_WRITE_ACKs, but has P_NEG_ACKs.
The master bio might already be completed, therefore the
request is no longer in the collision hash.
=> Do not try to validate block_id as request
In Protocol B we might already have got a P_RECV_ACK
but then get a P_NEG_ACK after wards.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
The point is that drbd_disconnect() can be called with a cstate of
WFConnection.
That happens if the user issues "drbdsetup disconnect" while the
drbd_connect() function executes. Then drbdd_init() will call
drbdd(), which in turn will return without receiving any
packets. Then drbdd_init() will end up calling drbd_disconnect()
with a cstate of WFConnection.
Bottom line: This assertion is wrong as it is, and we do not
see value in fixing it. => Removing it.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
The test if rs_pending_cnt == 0 was too weak. Using Test for
unacked_cnt == 0 instead. Moved that into the worker.
Since unacked_cnt gets already increased when an P_RS_DATA_REQ
comes in.
Also using a timer to make Ahead -> SyncSource -> Ahead cycles
slower...
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
See also commit from 2009-08-15
"drbd_uuid_compare(): Do not full sync in case a P_SYNC_UUID packet gets lost."
We saw cases where the History UUIDs where not as expected. So the
detection of the special case did not trigger. With the sync UUID
no longer being a random number, but deducible from the previous
bitmap UUID, the detection of this special case becomes more
reliable.
The SyncUUID now is the previous bitmap UUID + 0x1000000000000.
Rule 5a:
Cs = H1p & H1p + Offset = Bp
Connection was lost before SyncUUID Packet came through.
Corrent (peer) UUIDs:
Bp = H1p
H1p = H2p
H2p = 0
Become Sync target.
Rule 7a:
Cp = H1s & H1s + Offset = Bs
Connection was lost before SyncUUID Packet came through.
Correct (own) UUIDs:
Bs = H1s
H1s = H2s
H2s = 0
Become Sync source.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Besides removed a few lines of code, this moves the inspection
of the state from before the queuing process to after the queuing.
I.e. more closely to the actual invocation of the work.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
We may not get from SyncSource to Ahead if we have sent some
P_RS_DATA_REPLY packets to the peer and are waiting for
P_WRITE_ACK.
Again, this is not relevant for proper tuned systems, but makes
sure that the not-tuned system does not get diverging bitmaps.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
When the sync source node replies to a P_RS_DATA_REQUEST packet
when it is already in ahead mode. I.e. those two packets
crossed each other on the wire, that may lead to diverging
bitmaps.
This never happens in a well-tuned-system. In a well-tuned-
system the resync controller has reduced the resync speed
to zero long before we got into ahead-mode.
But we have to be prepared for the not-well-tuned-system
of course as well.
Because -> diverging bitmaps = non terminating resync.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Create a new barrier when leaving the AHEAD mode.
Otherwise we trigger the assertion in req_mod(, barrier_acked)
D_ASSERT(req->rq_state & RQ_NET_SENT);
The new barrier is created by recycling the newest existing one.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
When on-no-data-accessible is set to suspend-io, also consider that
a Primary, SyncTarget node losses its connection.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
I run into something declaring itself as "spinlock deadlock",
BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#1, kjournald/27816, ffff88000ad6bca0
Pid: 27816, comm: kjournald Tainted: G W 2.6.34.6 #2
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff811ba0aa>] do_raw_spin_lock+0x11e/0x14d
[<ffffffff81340fde>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x6a/0x81
[<ffffffff8103b694>] ? __wake_up+0x22/0x50
[<ffffffff8103b694>] __wake_up+0x22/0x50
[<ffffffffa07ff661>] bm_async_io_complete+0x258/0x299 [drbd]
but the call traces do not fit at all,
all other cpus are cpu_idle.
I think it may be this race:
drbd_bm_write_page
wait_queue_head_t io_wait;
atomic_t in_flight;
bm_async_io
submit_bio
bm_async_io_complete
if (atomic_dec_and_test(in_flight))
wait_event(io_wait,
atomic_read(in_flight) == 0)
return
wake_up(io_wait)
The wake_up now accesses the wait_queue_head_t spinlock, which is no
longer valid, since the stack frame of drbd_bm_write_page has been
clobbered now.
Fix this by using struct completion, which does both the condition test
as well as the wake_up inside its spinlock, so this race cannot happen.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Even though we now track the need for bitmap writeout per bitmap page,
there is no need to trigger the writeout while a resync is going on.
Once the resync is finished (or aborted),
we trigger bitmap writeout anyways.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
We expect changes to a bitmap page in drbd_bm_write_page,
that's why we submit a copy page.
If a page changes during global writeout, that would be unexpected,
and reason to warn, though.
Also, often page writeout can be skipped (on activity log transactions
during normal operation, for example), no need to log that everytime.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
