The Coverity checker spotted this obvious use-after-release bug caused
by a wrong order of the cleanups.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
In __rpc_purge_upcall (net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c), the newer code to clean up
the in_upcall list has a typo.
Thanks to Vince Busam <vbusam@google.com> for spotting this!
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
In cases where the server has gone insane, nfs_update_inode() may end
up calling nfs_invalidate_inode(), which again calls stuff that takes
the inode->i_lock that we're already holding.
In addition, given the sort of things we have in NFS these days that
need to be cleaned up on inode release, I'm not sure we should ever
be calling make_bad_inode().
Fix up spinlock recursion, and limit nfs_invalidate_inode() to clearing
the caches, and marking the inode as being stale.
Thanks to Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com> for spotting this.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
When caching locks due to holding a file delegation, we must always
check against local locks before sending anything to the server.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Blah. The patch [0] I recently sent fixing errors with
in_hugepage_area() and prepare_hugepage_range() for powerpc itself has
an off-by-one bug. Furthermore, the related functions
touches_hugepage_*_range() and within_hugepage_*_range() are also
buggy. Some of the bugs, like those addressed in [0] originated with
commit 7d24f0b8a5 where we tweaked the
semantics of where hugepages are allowed. Other bugs have been there
essentially forever, and are due to the undefined behaviour of '<<'
with shift counts greater than the type width (LOW_ESID_MASK could
return non-zero for high ranges with the right congruences).
The good news is that I now have a testsuite which should pick up
things like this if they creep in again.
[0] "powerpc-fix-for-hugepage-areas-straddling-4gb-boundary"
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
With the removal of include/asm-powerpc, we no longer need
arch/powerpc/include/asm for the 64 bit build. We also do not need
-Iarch/powerpc for the 64 bit build either.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
its queue of IO completion callbacks, thus creating the deadlock between
umount and xfslogd. Breaking the loop solves the problem.
SGI-PV: 943821
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:202363a
Signed-off-by: Felix Blyakher <felixb@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
This code fixes a tiny problem with the recent fbcon rotation changes:
fb_prepare_logo doesn't check the return value of fb_find_logo and that
causes a crash for my while booting.
Obvious & working & tested fix is here.
Signed-off-by: Jasper Spaans <jasper@vs19.net>
Acked-by: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@pol.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
A fix for a locking bug which is triggered when a client tries to lock with
flag DMA_QUIESCENT (typically the X server), but gets interrupted by a signal.
The locking IOCTL should then return an error, but if DMA_QUIESCENT succeeds
it returns 0, and the client falsely thinks it has the lock. In addition
The client waits for DMA_QUISCENT and possibly DMA_READY without having the lock.
From: Thomas Hellstrom
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:34:24PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:52:32 +0100, David Härdeman <david@2gen.com> wrote:
>> usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning
>> Vendor: I0MEGA Model: UMni1GB*IOM2K4 Rev: 1.01
>> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
>> SCSI device sda: 2048000 512-byte hdwr sectors (1049 MB)
>> sda: Write Protect is off
>> sda: Mode Sense: 00 00 00 00
>> sda: assuming drive cache: write through
>> ioctl_internal_command: <8 0 0 0> return code = 8000002
>> : Current: sense key=0x0
>> ASC=0x0 ASCQ=0x0
>> SCSI device sda: 2048000 512-byte hdwr sectors (1049 MB)
>
>I think it's harmless. I saw things like that, and initially I plugged
>them with workarounds like this:
Thanks for the pointer, and yes, it is harmless, but it floods the
console with the messages which hides other (potentially important)
messages...following your example I've made a patch which fixes the
problem.
Signed-off-by: David Härdeman <david@2gen.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
