Since pick_next_highest_task_rt() already iterates all the cgroups and
is really only interested in tasks, skip over the !task entries.
Reported-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Tested-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
What happens is that we schedule badly like:
<...>-1987 [019] 280.252808: x86_pmu_start: event-46/1300c0: idx: 0
<...>-1987 [019] 280.252811: x86_pmu_start: event-47/1300c0: idx: 1
<...>-1987 [019] 280.252812: x86_pmu_start: event-48/1300c0: idx: 2
<...>-1987 [019] 280.252813: x86_pmu_start: event-49/1300c0: idx: 3
<...>-1987 [019] 280.252814: x86_pmu_start: event-50/1300c0: idx: 32
<...>-1987 [019] 280.252825: x86_pmu_stop: event-46/1300c0: idx: 0
<...>-1987 [019] 280.252826: x86_pmu_stop: event-47/1300c0: idx: 1
<...>-1987 [019] 280.252827: x86_pmu_stop: event-48/1300c0: idx: 2
<...>-1987 [019] 280.252828: x86_pmu_stop: event-49/1300c0: idx: 3
<...>-1987 [019] 280.252829: x86_pmu_stop: event-50/1300c0: idx: 32
<...>-1987 [019] 280.252834: x86_pmu_start: event-47/1300c0: idx: 1
<...>-1987 [019] 280.252834: x86_pmu_start: event-48/1300c0: idx: 2
<...>-1987 [019] 280.252835: x86_pmu_start: event-49/1300c0: idx: 3
<...>-1987 [019] 280.252836: x86_pmu_start: event-50/1300c0: idx: 32
<...>-1987 [019] 280.252837: x86_pmu_start: event-51/1300c0: idx: 32 *FAIL*
This happens because we only iterate the n_running events in the first
pass, and reset their index to -1 if they don't match to force a
re-assignment.
Now, in our RR example, n_running == 0 because we fully unscheduled, so
event-50 will retain its idx==32, even though in scheduling it will have
gotten idx=0, and we don't trigger the re-assign path.
The easiest way to fix this is the below patch, which simply validates
the full assignment in the second pass.
Reported-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1268311069.5037.31.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Fix:
arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c:1334: error: 'power_pmu_notifier' undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c:1334: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c:1334: error: for each function it appears in.)
arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c:1334: error: implicit declaration of function 'power_pmu_notifier'
arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c:1334: error: implicit declaration of function 'register_cpu_notifier'
Due to commit 3f6da390 (perf: Rework and fix the arch CPU-hotplug hooks).
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
hw_perf_enable() would enable already enabled events.
This causes problems with code that assumes that ->enable/->disable calls
are balanced (like the LBR code does).
What happens is that events that were already running and left in place
would get enabled again.
Avoid this by only enabling new events that match their previous
assignment.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Cc: paulus@samba.org
Cc: eranian@google.com
Cc: robert.richter@amd.com
Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
hw_perf_enable() would disable events that were not yet enabled.
This causes problems with code that assumes that ->enable/->disable calls
are balanced (like the LBR code does).
What happens is that we disable newly added counters that match their
previous assignment, even though they are not yet programmed on the
hardware.
Avoid this by only doing the first pass over the existing events.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Cc: paulus@samba.org
Cc: eranian@google.com
Cc: robert.richter@amd.com
Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Patch 1da53e0230 ("perf_events, x86: Improve x86 event scheduling")
lost us one of the fixed purpose counters and then ed8777fc13
("perf_events, x86: Fix event constraint masks") broke it even
further.
Widen the fixed event mask to event+umask and specify the full config
for each of the 3 fixed purpose counters. Then let the init code fill
out the placement for the GP regs based on the cpuid info.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The ANY flag can show SMT data of another task (like 'top'),
so we want to disable it when system-wide profiling is
disabled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Split amd,p6,intel into separate files so that we can easily deal with
CONFIG_CPU_SUP_* things, needed to make things build now that perf_event.c
relies on symbols from amd.c
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
We re-program the event control register every time we reset the count,
this appears to be superflous, hence remove it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
DaveM reported that currently perf interprets the pgoff value reported by
the MMAP events as a byte range, but the kernel reports it as a page
offset.
Since its broken (and unusable) anyway, change the kernel behaviour (ABI)
to report bytes indeed, avoiding the need for userspace to deal with
PAGE_SIZE things.
Reported-by: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Thomas found that due to ttwu() changing a task's cpu without holding
the rq->lock, task_rq_lock() might end up locking the wrong rq.
Avoid this by serializing against TASK_WAKING.
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1266241712.15770.420.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Pretty much all of the calls do perf_disable/perf_enable cycles, pull
that out to cut back on hardware programming.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
hrtimers callbacks are always done from hardirq context, either the
jiffy tick interrupt or the hrtimer device interrupt.
[ there is currently one exception that can still call a hrtimer
callback from softirq, but even in that case this will still
work correctly. ]
Reported-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Yury Polyanskiy <ypolyans@princeton.edu>
Tested-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
LKML-Reference: <1265120401.24455.306.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
At enable time the counter might still have a ->idx pointing to
a previously occupied location that might now be taken by
another event. Resetting the counter at that location with data
from this event will destroy the other counter's count.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100127221122.261477183@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The new Intel documentation includes Westmere arch specific
event maps that are significantly different from the Nehalem
ones. Add support for this generation.
Found the CPUID model numbers on wikipedia.
Also ammend some Nehalem constraints, spotted those when looking
for the differences between Nehalem and Westmere.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100127221122.151865645@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Share the meat of the x86_pmu_disable() code with hw_perf_enable().
Also remove the barrier() from that code, since I could not convince
myself we actually need it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
x86_pmu_disable() removes the event from the cpuc->event_list[], however
since an event can only be on that list once, stop looking after we found
it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
There was a bug in the old period code that caused intel_pmu_enable_all()
or native_write_msr_safe() to show up quite high in the profiles.
In staring at that code it made my head hurt, so I rewrote it in a
hopefully simpler fashion. Its now fully symetric between tick and
overflow driven adjustments and uses less data to boot.
The only complication is that it basically wants to do a u128 division.
The code approximates that in a rather simple truncate until it fits
fashion, taking care to balance the terms while truncating.
This version does not generate that sampling artefact.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
There are a number of issues:
1) TASK_WAKING vs cgroup_clone (cpusets)
copy_process():
sched_fork()
child->state = TASK_WAKING; /* waiting for wake_up_new_task() */
if (current->nsproxy != p->nsproxy)
ns_cgroup_clone()
cgroup_clone()
mutex_lock(inode->i_mutex)
mutex_lock(cgroup_mutex)
cgroup_attach_task()
ss->can_attach()
ss->attach() [ -> cpuset_attach() ]
cpuset_attach_task()
set_cpus_allowed_ptr();
while (child->state == TASK_WAKING)
cpu_relax();
will deadlock the system.
2) cgroup_clone (cpusets) vs copy_process
So even if the above would work we still have:
copy_process():
if (current->nsproxy != p->nsproxy)
ns_cgroup_clone()
cgroup_clone()
mutex_lock(inode->i_mutex)
mutex_lock(cgroup_mutex)
cgroup_attach_task()
ss->can_attach()
ss->attach() [ -> cpuset_attach() ]
cpuset_attach_task()
set_cpus_allowed_ptr();
...
p->cpus_allowed = current->cpus_allowed
over-writing the modified cpus_allowed.
3) fork() vs hotplug
if we unplug the child's cpu after the sanity check when the child
gets attached to the task_list but before wake_up_new_task() shit
will meet with fan.
Solve all these issues by moving fork cpu selection into
wake_up_new_task().
Reported-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1264106190.4283.1314.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The is_software_event() definition always confuses me because its an
exclusive expression, make it an inclusive one.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Anton reported that perf record kept receiving events even after calling
ioctl(PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE). It turns out that FORK,COMM and MMAP
events didn't respect the disabled state and kept flowing in.
Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Tested-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
LKML-Reference: <1263459187.4244.265.camel@laptop>
CC: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Paul questioned the context in which we should call
perf_event_do_pending(). After looking at that I found that it should be
called from IRQ context these days, however the fallback call-site is
placed in softirq context. Ammend this by placing the callback in the IRQ
timer path.
Reported-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1263374859.4244.192.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Since all load_balance() callers will have !NULL balance parameters we
can now assume so and remove a few checks.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The two functions: load_balance{,_newidle}() are very similar, with the
following differences:
- rq->lock usage
- sb->balance_interval updates
- *balance check
So remove the load_balance_newidle() call with load_balance(.idle =
CPU_NEWLY_IDLE), explicitly unlock the rq->lock before calling (would be
done by double_lock_balance() anyway), and ignore the other differences
for now.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
load_balance() and load_balance_newidle() look remarkably similar, one
key point they differ in is the condition on when to active balance.
So split out that logic into a separate function.
One side effect is that previously load_balance_newidle() used to fail
and return -1 under these conditions, whereas now it doesn't. I've not
yet fully figured out the whole -1 return case for either
load_balance{,_newidle}().
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Since load-balancing can hold rq->locks for quite a long while, allow
breaking out early when there is lock contention.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Move code around to get rid of fwd declarations.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Again, since we only iterate the fair class, remove the abstraction.
Since this is the last user of the rq_iterator, remove all that too.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Since we only ever iterate the fair class, do away with this abstraction.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Take out the sched_class methods for load-balancing.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Straight fwd code movement.
Since non of the load-balance abstractions are used anymore, do away with
them and simplify the code some. In preparation move the code around.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Liming found a NULL deref when a task has a perf context but no
counters when it forks.
This can occur in two cases, a race during construction where
the fork hits after installing the context but before the first
counter gets inserted, or more reproducably, a fork after the
last counter is closed (which leaves the context around).
Reported-by: Wang Liming <liming.wang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
CC: <stable@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <1262185684.7135.222.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Since we only ever schedule the local cpu, there is no need to pass the
cpu number to the perf sched hooks.
This micro-optimizes things a bit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
There's a preemption race in the set_task_cpu() debug check in
that when we get preempted after setting task->state we'd still
be on the rq proper, but fail the test.
Check for preempted tasks, since those are always on the RQ.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20091217121830.137155561@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Acme noticed that his FORK/MMAP numbers were inflated by about
the same factor as his cpu-count.
This led to the discovery of a few more sites that need to
respect the event->cpu filter.
Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
LKML-Reference: <20091217121830.215333434@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
In order to remove the cfs_rq dependency from set_task_cpu() we
need to ensure the task is cfs_rq invariant for all callsites.
The simple approach is to substract cfs_rq->min_vruntime from
se->vruntime on dequeue, and add cfs_rq->min_vruntime on
enqueue.
However, this has the downside of breaking FAIR_SLEEPERS since
we loose the old vruntime as we only maintain the relative
position.
To solve this, we observe that we only migrate runnable tasks,
we do this using deactivate_task(.sleep=0) and
activate_task(.wakeup=0), therefore we can restrain the
min_vruntime invariance to that state.
The only other case is wakeup balancing, since we want to
maintain the old vruntime we cannot make it relative on dequeue,
but since we don't migrate inactive tasks, we can do so right
before we activate it again.
This is where we need the new pre-wakeup hook, we need to call
this while still holding the old rq->lock. We could fold it into
->select_task_rq(), but since that has multiple callsites and
would obfuscate the locking requirements, that seems like a
fudge.
This leaves the fork() case, simply make sure that ->task_fork()
leaves the ->vruntime in a relative state.
This covers all cases where set_task_cpu() gets called, and
ensures it sees a relative vruntime.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
LKML-Reference: <20091216170518.191697025@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
As will be apparent in the next patch, we need a pre wakeup hook
for sched_fair task migration, hence rename the post wakeup hook
and one pre wakeup.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
LKML-Reference: <20091216170518.114746117@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Since select_task_rq() is now responsible for guaranteeing
->cpus_allowed and cpu_active_mask, we need to verify this.
select_task_rq_rt() can blindly return
smp_processor_id()/task_cpu() without checking the valid masks,
select_task_rq_fair() can do the same in the rare case that all
SD_flags are disabled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
LKML-Reference: <20091216170517.961475466@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Since we access ->cpus_allowed without holding rq->lock we need
a retry loop to validate the result, this comes for near free
when we merge sched_migrate_task() into sched_exec() since that
already does the needed check.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
LKML-Reference: <20091216170517.884743662@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
In order to clean up the set_task_cpu() rq dependencies we need
to ensure it is never called on blocked tasks because such usage
does not pair with consistent rq->lock usage.
This puts the migration burden on ttwu().
Furthermore we need to close a race against changing
->cpus_allowed, since select_task_rq() runs with only preemption
disabled.
For sched_fork() this is safe because the child isn't in the
tasklist yet, for wakeup we fix this by synchronizing
set_cpus_allowed_ptr() against TASK_WAKING, which leaves
sched_exec to be a problem
This also closes a hole in (6ad4c1888 sched: Fix balance vs
hotplug race) where ->select_task_rq() doesn't validate the
result against the sched_domain/root_domain.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
LKML-Reference: <20091216170517.807938893@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
In order to allow for per-task-per-cpu counters, useful for
scalability when profiling task hierarchies, we allow installing
events with event->cpu != -1 in task contexts.
__perf_event_sched_in() already skips events where ->cpu
mis-matches the current cpu, fix up __perf_install_in_context()
and __perf_event_enable() to also respect this filter.
This does lead to vary hard to interpret enabled/running times
for such counters, but I don't see a simple solution for that.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
LKML-Reference: <20091216165904.831451147@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
83f9ac removed a call to effective_prio() in wake_up_new_task(), which
leads to tasks running at MAX_PRIO.
This is caused by the idle thread being set to MAX_PRIO before forking
off init. O(1) used that to make sure idle was always preempted, CFS
uses check_preempt_curr_idle() for that so we can savely remove this bit
of legacy code.
Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1259754383.4003.610.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
When setting the weight for a per-cpu task-group, we have to put in a
phantom weight when there is no work on that cpu, otherwise we'll not
service that cpu when new work gets placed there until we again update
the per-cpu weights.
We used to add these phantom weights to the total, so that the idle
per-cpu shares don't get inflated, this however causes the non-idle
parts to get deflated, causing unexpected weight distibutions.
Reverse this, so that the non-idle shares are correct but the idle
shares are inflated.
Reported-by: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1257934048.23203.76.camel@twins>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
As Nick pointed out, and realized by myself when doing:
sched: Fix balance vs hotplug race
the patch:
sched: for_each_domain() vs RCU
is wrong, sched_domains are freed after synchronize_sched(), which
means disabling preemption is enough.
Reported-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
WAKEUP_RUNNING was an experiment, not sure why that ever ended up being
merged...
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Streamline the wakeup preemption code a bit, unifying the preempt path
so that they all do the same.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Currently we try to do task placement in wake_up_new_task() after we do
the load-balance pass in sched_fork(). This yields complicated semantics
in that we have to deal with tasks on different RQs and the
set_task_cpu() calls in copy_process() and sched_fork()
Rename ->task_new() to ->task_fork() and call it from sched_fork()
before the balancing, this gives the policy a clear point to place the
task.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Since set_task_clock() doesn't rely on rq->clock anymore we can simplyfy
the mess in ttwu().
Optimize things a bit by not fiddling with the IRQ state there.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
set_task_cpu() should be rq invariant and only touch task state, it
currently fails to do so, which opens up a few races, since not all
callers hold both rq->locks.
Remove the relyance on rq->clock, as any site calling set_task_cpu()
should also do a remote clock update, which should ensure the observed
time between these two cpus is monotonic, as per
kernel/sched_clock.c:sched_clock_remote().
Therefore we can simply remove the clock_offset bits and be happy.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Since we've had a much saner debugfs interface to this, remove the
sysctl one.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
[ v2: build fix ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Since (e761b77: cpu hotplug, sched: Introduce cpu_active_map and redo
sched domain managment) we have cpu_active_mask which is suppose to rule
scheduler migration and load-balancing, except it never (fully) did.
The particular problem being solved here is a crash in try_to_wake_up()
where select_task_rq() ends up selecting an offline cpu because
select_task_rq_fair() trusts the sched_domain tree to reflect the
current state of affairs, similarly select_task_rq_rt() trusts the
root_domain.
However, the sched_domains are updated from CPU_DEAD, which is after the
cpu is taken offline and after stop_machine is done. Therefore it can
race perfectly well with code assuming the domains are right.
Cure this by building the domains from cpu_active_mask on
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Make perf_swevent_get_recursion_context return a context number
and disable preemption.
This could be used to remove the IRQ disable from the trace bit
and index the per-cpu buffer with.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
LKML-Reference: <20091123103819.993226816@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Move the update_event_times() call in __perf_event_exit_task()
into list_del_event() because that holds the proper lock
(ctx->lock) and seems a more natural place to do the last time
update.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <20091123103819.842455480@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
It appeared we did call update_event_times() on exit, but we
failed to update the context time, which renders the former
moot.
Locking is a bit iffy, we call update_event_times under
ctx->mutex instead of ctx->lock - the next patch fixes this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <20091123103819.764207355@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Most sites updating ctx->time and event times do so under
ctx->lock, make sure they all do.
This was made possible by removing the __perf_event_read() call
from __perf_event_sync_stat(), which already had this lock
taken.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
LKML-Reference: <20091120212509.102316434@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cpuctx is always active, task context is always active for
current
the previous condition verifies that if its a task context its
for current, hence we can assume ctx->is_active.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
LKML-Reference: <20091120212509.000272254@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Removes constraints from __perf_event_read() by leaving it with
a single callsite; this callsite had ctx->lock held, the other
one does not.
Removes some superfluous code from __perf_event_sync_stat().
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
LKML-Reference: <20091120212508.918544317@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstra