new sim module firmware, shorter delays for T=0 transfers

This commit is contained in:
iceman1001
2026-08-27 01:38:46 +02:00
parent a76399c030
commit 84ad2fb8d4
9 changed files with 116 additions and 220 deletions
+9 -30
View File
@@ -45,13 +45,9 @@
#define SC_PROTO_T0 (1 << 0)
#define SC_PROTO_T1 (1 << 1)
// Protocols the last ATR offered, as a bit mask of (1 << T). Zero means we do
// not know - no ATR has been read since the module was last reset.
// protocols the last ATR offered, (1 << T). 0 = no ATR read since reset
static uint8_t s_card_protocols = 0;
// Whether the protocol choice has already been reported this session. These
// messages are worth seeing once; sc_raw_device_cmd() runs per APDU, and an
// EMV AID sweep is 150 of them.
// sc_raw_device_cmd() runs per APDU, so report the choice once per card
static bool s_proto_announced = false;
// try i2c bus recovery at 100kHz = 5us high, 5us low
@@ -848,11 +844,8 @@ bool sc_rx_bytes(uint8_t *dest, uint16_t *destlen, uint32_t wait) {
return true;
}
/*
* ISO/IEC 7816-3 clause 8: the protocols on offer are the low nibbles of the
* TDi bytes. With no TD1 at all, only T=0 is offered. T=15 carries global
* interface bytes rather than a transmission protocol and is ignored here.
*/
// ISO 7816-3 clause 8: offered protocols are the low nibbles of the TDi bytes.
// No TD1 means T=0 only. T=15 is global interface bytes, not a protocol.
static uint8_t atr_protocols(const uint8_t *atr, uint8_t len) {
if (len < 2) {
@@ -892,10 +885,7 @@ static uint8_t atr_protocols(const uint8_t *atr, uint8_t len) {
uint8_t sc_raw_device_cmd(smartcard_command_t flags) {
// An explicit T=1 request is always honoured as asked - it is an override,
// and a card that supports T=1 without advertising it is a real thing. But
// say so when the ATR disagrees, because the alternative is silence from
// the card and no clue why.
// an explicit T=1 request is an override, honoured even if the ATR disagrees
if ((flags & SC_RAW_T1) == SC_RAW_T1) {
if ((s_card_protocols != 0) && ((s_card_protocols & SC_PROTO_T1) == 0)) {
@@ -909,21 +899,10 @@ uint8_t sc_raw_device_cmd(smartcard_command_t flags) {
if ((flags & SC_RAW_T0) == SC_RAW_T0) {
/*
* A T=0 request to a card whose ATR offers no T=0 cannot work - the
* card will not hear it at all, which shows up as silence rather than
* an error. Most modern EMV and JCOP cards are T=1 only, and callers
* like ExchangeAPDUSC() ask for T=0 unconditionally.
*
* Only this one case is redirected, and only once an ATR has actually
* been read. A card that does offer T=0 is left alone even if it also
* offers T=1, because there the caller's choice is a real one - use
* SC_RAW_T1 to say otherwise.
*
* Note this cannot make anything worse even against a SIM module too
* old to know SEND_T1: in the exact case it fires, the request as given
* was already guaranteed to fail.
*/
// A T=0 request to a card offering no T=0 cannot work - it simply will
// not hear it. Most modern EMV/JCOP cards are T=1 only and callers like
// ExchangeAPDUSC() ask for T=0 unconditionally. Redirect only that case;
// a card offering both keeps the caller's choice.
if ((s_card_protocols != 0) &&
((s_card_protocols & SC_PROTO_T0) == 0) &&
((s_card_protocols & SC_PROTO_T1) == SC_PROTO_T1)) {
+11 -76
View File
@@ -50,94 +50,29 @@
// The SIM module v4 supports up to 384 bytes for the length.
#define ISO7816_MAX_FRAME 270
/*
* Bit banged bus timing.
*
* I2C_DELAY_1CLK is spent twice per bit and I2C_DELAY_2CLK once, so the bit
* period is 2 * 1CLK + 2CLK. At 2/4 us that is ~125 kHz nominal; expect nearer
* 90 kHz once SpinDelayUsPrecision()'s own overhead at these short durations is
* counted.
*
* TODO DXL 修改了速度到比较慢的情况,测完需要改回来,原先是2和4
*
* ("the speed was changed to a slower setting; change it back after testing,
* originally 2 and 4")
*
* That TODO belongs to the HAL refactoring for the Proxmark5 (Artery
* AT32F435/437), where SpinDelayUsPrecision() is a different implementation
* whose overhead at a two microsecond request has not been measured. The
* 20/22 us it was raised to is kept for that platform rather than thrown away.
*
* Nothing depends on it yet: smartcard support is not built for PM5 - see the
* "暂时不要编译i2c" note beside its PLATFORM_DEFS in common_arm/Makefile.hal -
* so the AT32 branch below is an unvalidated starting point, not a measurement.
* When that bring-up happens, measure the AT32 delay and set it here; every
* timeout in this file is derived from these two numbers, so that is the only
* place it needs to change.
*/
/*
* 20/22 on both platforms for now.
*
* Dropping this to 2/4 was tried and the bus stopped working entirely - no ATR,
* no answer to anything - even with the delay primitive's overshoot bug fixed
* (see SpinDelayUsPrecision in common_arm/ticks/ticks_hw_at91.c). 8 us per bit
* is about 125 kHz, and something in the path will not carry it: rise time
* through the pull ups is the obvious candidate, but it was not measured.
*
* Worth revisiting with a scope on SCL and SDA rather than by trial. Every
* timeout below is derived from these two numbers, so changing them is a
* two line edit once someone knows what the bus can actually do.
*/
#define I2C_DELAY_1CLK_US 20
#define I2C_DELAY_2CLK_US 22
// Bit banged bus timing. 1CLK is spent twice per bit, 2CLK once, so the bit
// period is 2 * 1CLK + 2CLK, here 17 us or about 59 kHz. Every timeout below
// derives from these, so they are the only two numbers to change.
#define I2C_DELAY_1CLK_US 5
#define I2C_DELAY_2CLK_US 7
/*
* Every SCL wait loop spends one I2C_DELAY_1CLK per iteration, so the timeouts
* below are iteration counts rather than times - which is why changing the
* delay used to silently rescale every one of them, and why the constants had
* drifted to roughly 6.5x their documented length.
*
* They are written in milliseconds now and converted in one place, so the two
* cannot come apart again. The conversion uses the nominal delay rather than a
* measured one on purpose: with the real per-iteration cost being a little
* higher, a timeout always lasts at least as long as it asks for.
*/
// The SCL wait loops spend one 1CLK per iteration, so their timeouts are
// iteration counts. Written in ms and converted here so the two cannot drift.
#define I2C_ITERS_PER_MS (1000U / I2C_DELAY_1CLK_US)
#define I2C_ITERS_FOR_MS(ms) ((uint32_t)(ms) * (uint32_t)I2C_ITERS_PER_MS)
// How long the master tolerates the slave stretching SCL inside a transfer.
#define I2C_STRETCH_TIMEOUT_MS 100
/*
* How long to wait for the SIM module to finish an operation and release SCL.
*
* This has to cover the card's own thinking time. A T=1 card's block waiting
* time is 1.4 s at the default BWI = 4, and a HID iCLASS SE SAM asks for
* BWI = 5, i.e. 2.9 s - so 3 s is the smallest value that clears both.
*/
// Upper bound on a host supplied SC_WAIT, so the conversion cannot overflow.
#define I2C_WAIT_MAX_MS 60000
#define I2C_STRETCH_TIMEOUT_MS 100 // slave stretching SCL inside a transfer
#define I2C_WAIT_MAX_MS 60000 // clamp on a host supplied SC_WAIT
// Must cover the card's block waiting time: 1.4 s at BWI=4, 2.9 s at BWI=5.
#define SIM_WAIT_MS 3000
#define SIM_WAIT_DELAY I2C_ITERS_FOR_MS(SIM_WAIT_MS)
/*
* Compile time guards on the two numbers above. The build is -std=c99 so this
* is the negative array size trick rather than _Static_assert.
*/
// -std=c99, so no _Static_assert
#define I2C_BUILD_ASSERT(cond, name) typedef char i2c_assert_##name[(cond) ? 1 : -1]
// A delay that does not divide 1000 makes I2C_ITERS_PER_MS silently lose
// precision, and every timeout with it.
I2C_BUILD_ASSERT((1000U % I2C_DELAY_1CLK_US) == 0, clk_divides_ms);
// A T=1 card may sit quiet for its whole block waiting time before answering:
// 1.4 s at the default BWI = 4, and 2.9 s at the BWI = 5 a HID iCLASS SE SAM
// asks for. Shorten this and T=1 starts timing out on slow cards with nothing
// to show for it but an empty response.
I2C_BUILD_ASSERT(SIM_WAIT_MS >= 3000, sim_wait_covers_bwt);
// The largest host supplied wait must still fit the iteration counter.
I2C_BUILD_ASSERT((uint64_t)I2C_WAIT_MAX_MS * I2C_ITERS_PER_MS <= 0xFFFFFFFFULL, wait_fits_u32);
Binary file not shown.
+1
View File
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
9a3d623aa3c749ffb5125b6a4912f74e46902a9135441c427e1635be24d43c048e40e1f60a052175f383a1316c63dbddb999cac170a4224fe9a0d7df896391d4 *sim018.bin
+24 -24
View File
@@ -818,17 +818,10 @@ void annotateTopaz(char *exp, size_t size, uint8_t *cmd, uint8_t cmdsize) {
// iso 7816-3
//
// `contact` tells the two framings that reach this decoder apart:
//
// - contactless (ISO 14443-4 / T=CL): every frame is a block, its type is in
// the first byte, and the length comes from the transport layer.
// - contact (the SIM module): a T=0 frame is a bare APDU with no block layer
// at all, and a T=1 frame is NAD PCB LEN INF[LEN] EDC, so its length is
// fixed by LEN.
//
// Without that distinction a GSM APDU beginning with CLA 'A0' satisfies the
// T=CL R-block test - 0xA0 & 0xD0 == 0x80 - and "A0 A4 00 00 02 3F 00" gets
// annotated as "R-block ACK".
// contact tells the two framings apart: a contactless frame is always a block
// typed by its first byte, while a contact T=0 frame is a bare APDU and a T=1
// frame is NAD PCB LEN INF EDC. Without it a GSM APDU starting with CLA 'A0'
// matches the T=CL R-block test.
void annotateIso7816(char *exp, size_t size, uint8_t *cmd, uint8_t cmdsize, bool is_response, bool contact) {
if (cmdsize < 2) {
@@ -839,21 +832,29 @@ void annotateIso7816(char *exp, size_t size, uint8_t *cmd, uint8_t cmdsize, bool
return;
}
// A contact frame is either a bare T=0 APDU or a T=1 block, and the two
// framings put things in different places: T=1 is NAD PCB LEN INF[LEN] EDC,
// so the block type is in cmd[1], not cmd[0] the way T=CL has it.
//
// Only the one byte LRC is considered when matching the length. A five
// byte APDU whose P1 is zero - "A0 C0 00 00 22" - is indistinguishable from
// a LEN=0 block with a two byte CRC, and CRC EDC is vanishingly rare.
// Requiring NAD 0x00 rules out the rest; every card and this SIM module use
// it exclusively.
// T=1 puts the block type in cmd[1], not cmd[0] as T=CL does. Match only
// the one byte LRC length - a five byte APDU with P1 zero is otherwise
// indistinguishable from a LEN=0 block with a CRC. NAD must be 0x00.
if (contact) {
if ((cmdsize >= 4) && (cmd[0] == 0x00) && ((int)cmdsize == (int)cmd[2] + 4)) {
uint8_t pcb = cmd[1];
// Length alone is not enough - "00 B2 01 0C 00" is a READ RECORD
// that matches it. Require PCB and LEN to agree: an R-block carries
// no INF, an S-block at most one byte.
bool pcb_agrees = true;
if ((pcb & 0xC0) == 0x80) {
pcb_agrees = (cmd[2] == 0); /* R */
} else if ((pcb & 0xC0) == 0xC0) {
pcb_agrees = (cmd[2] <= 1); /* S */
}
if (pcb_agrees == false) {
goto not_a_block;
}
if ((pcb & 0x80) == 0x00) {
snprintf(exp, size, "I-block N(S)=%u%s", (pcb >> 6) & 1,
(pcb & 0x20) ? " chained" : "");
@@ -875,14 +876,13 @@ void annotateIso7816(char *exp, size_t size, uint8_t *cmd, uint8_t cmdsize, bool
}
return;
}
// not a block, so it is a bare APDU - decoded below with pos = 1
not_a_block:
; // a bare APDU then - decoded below with pos = 1
}
bool blocks = (contact == false);
// S-block. The test used to be a plain truthiness check on cmd[0] & 0xC0,
// so any first byte from 0x40 up landed here - an R-block 0xA2 in a 3 byte
// frame was reported as an S-block.
// S-block
if (blocks && ((cmd[0] & 0xC0) == 0xC0) && ((cmdsize == 3) || (cmdsize == 4))) {
switch ((cmd[0] & 0x3F)) {
+12 -40
View File
@@ -327,18 +327,9 @@ static int smart_wait(uint8_t *out, int maxoutlen, bool verbose) {
return -1;
}
// Which class byte a GET RESPONSE following a 61xx / 9Fxx should carry.
//
// There is no rule that can be derived from the command's own class, because
// two cards that both use CLA 'A0' disagree:
//
// - a GSM 11.11 / TS 51.011 SIM answers 6D00 to '00 C0 ...' and needs 'A0 C0'
// - a HID iCLASS SE SAM answers 6D00 to 'A0 C0 ...' and needs '00 C0'
//
// and EMV (Book 1, 9.3.1) fixes GET RESPONSE at '00' even after a proprietary
// '80' command. So '00' is tried first - the historical behaviour, right for
// EMV and for the SAM - and a card that rejects the class gets one retry with
// the class of the command that produced the status word.
// Class byte for a GET RESPONSE after 61xx / 9Fxx. No single rule works: a GSM
// SIM needs 'A0 C0' and rejects '00 C0', a HID iCLASS SE SAM is the other way
// round, and EMV fixes it at '00'. Try '00' first, then the command's own.
#define GETRESP_TRY_FIRST 0
#define GETRESP_TRY_RETRY 1
@@ -400,8 +391,7 @@ static int smart_responseEx(uint8_t *out, int maxoutlen, bool verbose, uint8_t c
if (verbose) PrintAndLogEx(INFO, "Requesting " _YELLOW_("0x%02X") " bytes response", len);
// '00' first, then one retry with the command's own class if the card
// rejects it - see get_response_cla() for why neither works everywhere.
// '00' first, then the command's own class if the card rejects it
for (int attempt = GETRESP_TRY_FIRST; attempt <= GETRESP_TRY_RETRY; attempt++) {
uint8_t cmd_getresp[] = {
@@ -442,20 +432,9 @@ static int smart_responseEx(uint8_t *out, int maxoutlen, bool verbose, uint8_t c
goto out;
}
/*
* Two shapes are valid here, depending on how the GET RESPONSE went out:
*
* len + 2 the data and its status word. This is what SEND_T0
* gives, because the module runs the procedure byte
* exchange itself and strips the echoed INS.
* len + 2 + 1 the same with that procedure byte still in front,
* which is what the raw pass through leaves behind.
*
* Only the second needs unwrapping - but the first used to fall through
* both branches without ever adding to totallen, so the caller got zero
* bytes and reported "result length = 0" while the card had answered
* perfectly. It went unnoticed while GET RESPONSE was always sent raw.
*/
// Two valid shapes: len+2 is data plus SW, which SEND_T0 gives since
// the module strips the procedure byte; len+2+1 still has it in front,
// as the raw pass through leaves it.
if (datalen == len + 2) {
totallen += datalen;
} else {
@@ -823,15 +802,14 @@ static int CmdSmartInfo(const char *Cmd) {
SendCommandNG(CMD_SMART_ATR, NULL, 0);
PacketResponseNG resp;
if (WaitForResponseTimeout(CMD_SMART_ATR, &resp, 2500) == false) {
if (verbose) {
PrintAndLogEx(WARNING, "smart card timeout");
}
PrintAndLogEx(WARNING, "smart card timeout");
return PM3_ETIMEOUT;
}
if (resp.status != PM3_SUCCESS) {
PrintAndLogEx(WARNING, "no ATR - check the card is present and seated");
if (verbose) {
PrintAndLogEx(WARNING, "smart card select failed");
PrintAndLogEx(INFO, "module returned status %d", resp.status);
}
return PM3_ESOFT;
}
@@ -1653,14 +1631,8 @@ int CmdSmartcard(const char *Cmd) {
return CmdsParse(CommandTable, Cmd);
}
/*
* Which protocol the contact exchanges below ask for.
*
* T=0 by default, which is what this has always sent. The ARM side already
* redirects a T=0 request to T=1 when the card's ATR offers no T=0 at all - a
* request that could not have worked as asked. This is for the other case: a
* card that offers both, where T=0 would work but you want T=1 anyway.
*/
// Protocol the contact exchanges ask for. T=0 by default; the ARM redirects a
// card offering no T=0 by itself, so this is for one that offers both.
static smartcard_command_t s_sc_protocol = SC_RAW_T0;
void SetSmartcardProtocolT1(bool use_t1) {
+5 -25
View File
@@ -575,16 +575,8 @@ static int emv_parse_card_details(uint8_t *response, size_t reslen, bool verbose
return PM3_SUCCESS;
}
/*
* Resolve --t0 / --t1 for the contact interface.
*
* The ARM already switches a card whose ATR offers no T=0 over to T=1 by
* itself, since a T=0 request to it could never have worked. This is for the
* other case: a card offering both, where T=0 is a legitimate choice and the
* caller wants T=1 anyway.
*
* Reports the problem and returns non-success if the flags make no sense.
*/
// Resolve --t0 / --t1 for the contact interface. The ARM switches a card
// offering no T=0 over by itself; this is for one that offers both.
static int emv_set_protocol(bool use_t0, bool use_t1, Iso7816CommandChannel channel) {
if (use_t0 && use_t1) {
@@ -660,8 +652,6 @@ static int CmdEMVSelect(const char *Cmd) {
if (sw == 0) {
PrintAndLogEx(FAILED, "No answer from card ( %d )", res);
if (channel == CC_CONTACT) {
// Point the other way when T=1 was forced - suggesting the flag
// that is already in use is worse than saying nothing.
if (GetSmartcardProtocolT1()) {
PrintAndLogEx(HINT, "Hint: card was driven as T=1, drop `" _YELLOW_("--t1") "` to use T=0");
} else {
@@ -2961,19 +2951,9 @@ static int CmdEMVReader(const char *Cmd) {
const char *al = "Applets";
struct tlvdb *tlvSelect = tlvdb_fixed(1, strlen(al), (const unsigned char *)al);
/*
* Search the directory this channel expects first, then the other one.
*
* A contact card may carry either: 1PAY was the norm and 2PAY is what
* modern cards use, and plenty carry only one of them. This used to
* select 2PAY, throw the answer away, and then search whichever psenum
* says - 1PAY on contact - so a card with only a PPSE fell through to
* the AID list sweep with its directory already read and discarded.
* The sweep then cannot find anything the built-in list does not carry,
* which is most non-Visa/Mastercard applets.
*
* The first call activates the field; the fallback reuses it.
*/
// Search the expected directory then the other - a contact card may
// carry 1PAY or 2PAY and plenty carry only one. First call activates
// the field, the fallback reuses it.
res = EMVSearchPSE(channel, true, true, psenum, false, tlvSelect, true);
if (res) {
res = EMVSearchPSE(channel, false, true, (psenum == 1) ? 2 : 1, false, tlvSelect, false);
+14 -6
View File
@@ -475,6 +475,17 @@ int EMVSearchPSE(Iso7816CommandChannel channel, bool ActivateField, bool LeaveFi
}
} else if (quiet == false) {
PrintAndLogEx(ERR, "%s ERROR: Can't select PPSE AID. Error: %d", PSE_or_PPSE, res);
// an empty slot and a card that is simply not an EMV card both land
// here, so ask the module which one it is
if ((res < 0) && (channel == CC_CONTACT)) {
smart_card_atr_t atr;
if (smart_select(false, &atr)) {
PrintAndLogEx(HINT, "Hint: card answered its ATR but not the APDU - is this an EMV card? try `" _YELLOW_("smart info") "`");
} else {
PrintAndLogEx(HINT, "Hint: no answer at all - is a card in the slot? try `" _YELLOW_("smart info") "`");
}
}
}
if (!LeaveFieldON)
@@ -503,12 +514,9 @@ int EMVSearch(Iso7816CommandChannel channel, bool ActivateField, bool LeaveField
// retry if error and not returned sw error
if (res && res != 5) {
// A negative result is a PM3_E* transport failure rather than
// anything the card said - PM3_EIO when the field has gone
// inactive, for instance. Retrying the same AID cannot fix that,
// and neither can the ~150 AIDs still to come: without this it
// retries each of them three times and prints a failure for every
// attempt.
// A negative result is a PM3_E* transport failure, not something
// the card said. Retrying cannot fix it, nor can the ~150 AIDs
// still to come.
if (res < 0) {
if (LeaveFieldON == false) {
DropFieldEx(channel);
+40 -19
View File
@@ -80,9 +80,11 @@ int Iso7816Connect(Iso7816CommandChannel channel) {
return res;
}
int Iso7816ExchangeEx(Iso7816CommandChannel channel, bool activate_field, bool leave_field_on,
sAPDU_t apdu, bool include_le, uint16_t le, uint8_t *result,
size_t max_result_len, size_t *result_len, uint16_t *sw) {
// allow_le_retry gates the 6Cxx reissue below; the retry itself passes false
static int iso7816_exchange_core(Iso7816CommandChannel channel, bool activate_field, bool leave_field_on,
sAPDU_t apdu, bool include_le, uint16_t le, uint8_t *result,
size_t max_result_len, size_t *result_len, uint16_t *sw,
bool allow_le_retry) {
*result_len = 0;
if (sw) {
@@ -178,6 +180,29 @@ int Iso7816ExchangeEx(Iso7816CommandChannel channel, bool activate_field, bool l
*sw = isw;
}
// 6Cxx is "wrong length, ask again for xx". Handled here rather than per
// command since any case 2/4 APDU can get it - READ RECORD and GET DATA
// both do. Once only; the card has named the length.
if (allow_le_retry && ((isw >> 8) == 0x6C)) {
if (APDULogging) {
PrintAndLogEx(INFO, ">>> wrong length, reissuing with Le=%02X...", isw & 0xFF);
}
return iso7816_exchange_core(channel
, false
, leave_field_on
, apdu
, true
, (uint16_t)(isw & 0xFF)
, result
, max_result_len
, result_len
, sw
, false
);
}
if (isw != ISO7816_OK) {
if (APDULogging) {
if (*sw >> 8 == 0x61) {
@@ -191,6 +216,14 @@ int Iso7816ExchangeEx(Iso7816CommandChannel channel, bool activate_field, bool l
return PM3_SUCCESS;
}
int Iso7816ExchangeEx(Iso7816CommandChannel channel, bool activate_field, bool leave_field_on,
sAPDU_t apdu, bool include_le, uint16_t le, uint8_t *result,
size_t max_result_len, size_t *result_len, uint16_t *sw) {
return iso7816_exchange_core(channel, activate_field, leave_field_on, apdu, include_le, le,
result, max_result_len, result_len, sw, true);
}
int Iso7816Exchange(Iso7816CommandChannel channel, bool leave_field_on, sAPDU_t apdu, uint8_t *result, size_t max_result_len, size_t *result_len, uint16_t *sw) {
return Iso7816ExchangeEx(channel
, false
@@ -220,22 +253,10 @@ int Iso7816Select(Iso7816CommandChannel channel, bool activate_field, bool leave
, sw
);
/*
* A contact card running T=1 needs the Le that a T=0 card must not be
* given. T=0 answers a case 4 command with 61xx and hands the data over
* through GET RESPONSE, so the Le is left off; T=1 carries the whole APDU
* in one block and has no such step, so the command has to ask for its
* length up front. Send one without and a strict card answers 6700.
*
* Rather than work out which protocol the link ended up on - the ARM may
* have switched to T=1 on its own, off the ATR, without the client being
* told - let the card say so and reissue. EMVReadRecord() and
* EMVGenerateChallenge() already do the mirror image of this.
*
* Only on 6700/6F00, and only on contact: a T=0 card has no reason to
* answer a SELECT that way, and if one did the retry costs a single extra
* APDU that it will reject just as it rejected the first.
*/
// T=1 carries the whole APDU in one block, so a case 4 command must include
// Le - unlike T=0, which answers 61xx and hands the data over via GET
// RESPONSE. A strict card answers 6700 without it. Reissue rather than work
// out which protocol the link ended up on.
if ((channel == CC_CONTACT) && (sw != NULL) && ((*sw == 0x6700) || (*sw == 0x6F00))) {
if (APDULogging) {