mirror of
https://github.com/netbirdio/gvisor.git
synced 2026-05-22 17:12:49 -07:00
Fix performance graph shortcode invocations
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Fabricio Voznika
parent
000ed17d48
commit
76a12063a6
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ accesses. Page faults and other Operating System (OS) mechanisms are translated
|
||||
through the Sentry, but once mappings are installed and available to the
|
||||
application, there is no additional overhead.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< graph id="sysbench-memory" url="/performance/sysbench-memory.csv" title="perf.py sysbench.memory --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
{{< graph id="sysbench-memory" url="/performance/sysbench-memory.csv" title="perf.py sysbench.memory --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
The above figure demonstrates the memory transfer rate as measured by
|
||||
`sysbench`.
|
||||
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ For many use cases, fixed memory overheads are a primary concern. This may be
|
||||
because sandboxed containers handle a low volume of requests, and it is
|
||||
therefore important to achieve high densities for efficiency.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< graph id="density" url="/performance/density.csv" title="perf.py density --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" log="true" y_min="100000" >}}
|
||||
{{< graph id="density" url="/performance/density.csv" title="perf.py density --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" log="true" y_min="100000" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
The above figure demonstrates these costs based on three sample applications.
|
||||
This test is the result of running many instances of a container (50, or 5 in
|
||||
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ gVisor does not perform emulation or otherwise interfere with the raw execution
|
||||
of CPU instructions by the application. Therefore, there is no runtime cost
|
||||
imposed for CPU operations.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< graph id="sysbench-cpu" url="/performance/sysbench-cpu.csv" title="perf.py sysbench.cpu --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
{{< graph id="sysbench-cpu" url="/performance/sysbench-cpu.csv" title="perf.py sysbench.cpu --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
The above figure demonstrates the `sysbench` measurement of CPU events per
|
||||
second. Events per second is based on a CPU-bound loop that calculates all prime
|
||||
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ This has important consequences for classes of workloads that are often
|
||||
CPU-bound, such as data processing or machine learning. In these cases, `runsc`
|
||||
will similarly impose minimal runtime overhead.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< graph id="tensorflow" url="/performance/tensorflow.csv" title="perf.py tensorflow --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
{{< graph id="tensorflow" url="/performance/tensorflow.csv" title="perf.py tensorflow --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
For example, the above figure shows a sample TensorFlow workload, the
|
||||
[convolutional neural network example][cnn]. The time indicated includes the
|
||||
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ supports a variety of platforms. These platforms present distinct performance,
|
||||
compatibility and security trade-offs. For example, the KVM platform has low
|
||||
overhead system call interception but runs poorly with nested virtualization.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< graph id="syscall" url="/performance/syscall.csv" title="perf.py syscall --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc-ptrace --runtime=runsc-kvm" y_min="100" log="true" >}}
|
||||
{{< graph id="syscall" url="/performance/syscall.csv" title="perf.py syscall --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc-ptrace --runtime=runsc-kvm" y_min="100" log="true" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
The above figure demonstrates the time required for a raw system call on various
|
||||
platforms. The test is implemented by a custom binary which performs a large
|
||||
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ tend to be high-performance data stores and static network services. In general,
|
||||
the impact of system call interception will be lower the more work an
|
||||
application does.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< graph id="redis" url="/performance/redis.csv" title="perf.py redis --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
{{< graph id="redis" url="/performance/redis.csv" title="perf.py redis --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
For example, `redis` is an application that performs relatively little work in
|
||||
userspace: in general it reads from a connected socket, reads or modifies some
|
||||
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ For many use cases, the ability to spin-up containers quickly and efficiently is
|
||||
important. A sandbox may be short-lived and perform minimal user work (e.g. a
|
||||
function invocation).
|
||||
|
||||
{{< graph id="startup" url="/performance/startup.csv" title="perf.py startup --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
{{< graph id="startup" url="/performance/startup.csv" title="perf.py startup --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
The above figure indicates how total time required to start a container through
|
||||
[Docker][docker]. This benchmark uses three different applications. First, an
|
||||
@@ -186,14 +186,14 @@ While typically not an important metric in practice for common sandbox use
|
||||
cases, nevertheless `iperf` is a common microbenchmark used to measure raw
|
||||
throughput.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< graph id="iperf" url="/performance/iperf.csv" title="perf.py iperf --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
{{< graph id="iperf" url="/performance/iperf.csv" title="perf.py iperf --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
The above figure shows the result of an `iperf` test between two instances. For
|
||||
the upload case, the specified runtime is used for the `iperf` client, and in
|
||||
the download case, the specified runtime is the server. A native runtime is
|
||||
always used for the other endpoint in the test.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< graph id="applications" metric="requests_per_second" url="/performance/applications.csv" title="perf.py http.(node|ruby) --connections=25 --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
{{< graph id="applications" metric="requests_per_second" url="/performance/applications.csv" title="perf.py http.(node|ruby) --connections=25 --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
The above figure shows the result of simple `node` and `ruby` web services that
|
||||
render a template upon receiving a request. Because these synthetic benchmarks
|
||||
@@ -214,20 +214,20 @@ through the [Gofer](../) as a result of our [security model](../security/), but
|
||||
in most cases are dominated by **implementation costs**, due to an internal
|
||||
[Virtual File System][vfs] (VFS) implementation that needs improvement.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< graph id="fio-bw" url="/performance/fio.csv" title="perf.py fio --engine=sync --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" log="true" >}}
|
||||
{{< graph id="fio-bw" url="/performance/fio.csv" title="perf.py fio --engine=sync --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" log="true" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
The above figures demonstrate the results of `fio` for reads and writes to and
|
||||
from the disk. In this case, the disk quickly becomes the bottleneck and
|
||||
dominates other costs.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< graph id="fio-tmpfs-bw" url="/performance/fio-tmpfs.csv" title="perf.py fio --engine=sync --runtime=runc --tmpfs=True --runtime=runsc" log="true" >}}
|
||||
{{< graph id="fio-tmpfs-bw" url="/performance/fio-tmpfs.csv" title="perf.py fio --engine=sync --runtime=runc --tmpfs=True --runtime=runsc" log="true" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
The above figure shows the raw I/O performance of using a `tmpfs` mount which is
|
||||
sandbox-internal in the case of `runsc`. Generally these operations are
|
||||
similarly bound to the cost of copying around data in-memory, and we don't see
|
||||
the cost of VFS operations.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< graph id="httpd100k" metric="transfer_rate" url="/performance/httpd100k.csv" title="perf.py http.httpd --connections=1 --connections=5 --connections=10 --connections=25 --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
{{< graph id="httpd100k" metric="transfer_rate" url="/performance/httpd100k.csv" title="perf.py http.httpd --connections=1 --connections=5 --connections=10 --connections=25 --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
The high costs of VFS operations can manifest in benchmarks that execute many
|
||||
such operations in the hot path for serving requests, for example. The above
|
||||
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ internal serialization points (since all requests are reading the same file).
|
||||
Note that some of some of network stack performance issues also impact this
|
||||
benchmark.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< graph id="ffmpeg" url="/performance/ffmpeg.csv" title="perf.py media.ffmpeg --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
{{< graph id="ffmpeg" url="/performance/ffmpeg.csv" title="perf.py media.ffmpeg --runtime=runc --runtime=runsc" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
For benchmarks that are bound by raw disk I/O and a mix of compute, file system
|
||||
operations are less of an issue. The above figure shows the total time required
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user