399 lines
18 KiB
C#
399 lines
18 KiB
C#
|
//---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
// <copyright file="KeyPullup.cs" company="Microsoft">
|
|||
|
|
// Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
|
|||
|
|
// </copyright>
|
|||
|
|
//
|
|||
|
|
// @owner [....]
|
|||
|
|
// @backupOwner [....]
|
|||
|
|
//---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
using System;
|
|||
|
|
using System.Collections.Generic;
|
|||
|
|
//using System.Diagnostics; // Please use PlanCompiler.Assert instead of Debug.Assert in this class...
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// It is fine to use Debug.Assert in cases where you assert an obvious thing that is supposed
|
|||
|
|
// to prevent from simple mistakes during development (e.g. method argument validation
|
|||
|
|
// in cases where it was you who created the variables or the variables had already been validated or
|
|||
|
|
// in "else" clauses where due to code changes (e.g. adding a new value to an enum type) the default
|
|||
|
|
// "else" block is chosen why the new condition should be treated separately). This kind of asserts are
|
|||
|
|
// (can be) helpful when developing new code to avoid simple mistakes but have no or little value in
|
|||
|
|
// the shipped product.
|
|||
|
|
// PlanCompiler.Assert *MUST* be used to verify conditions in the trees. These would be assumptions
|
|||
|
|
// about how the tree was built etc. - in these cases we probably want to throw an exception (this is
|
|||
|
|
// what PlanCompiler.Assert does when the condition is not met) if either the assumption is not correct
|
|||
|
|
// or the tree was built/rewritten not the way we thought it was.
|
|||
|
|
// Use your judgment - if you rather remove an assert than ship it use Debug.Assert otherwise use
|
|||
|
|
// PlanCompiler.Assert.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
using System.Globalization;
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
using System.Data.Query.InternalTrees;
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
//
|
|||
|
|
// The KeyPullup module helps pull up keys from the leaves of a subtree.
|
|||
|
|
//
|
|||
|
|
namespace System.Data.Query.PlanCompiler
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|||
|
|
/// The KeyPullup class subclasses the default visitor and pulls up keys
|
|||
|
|
/// for the different node classes below.
|
|||
|
|
/// The only Op that really deserves special treatment is the ProjectOp.
|
|||
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|||
|
|
internal class KeyPullup : BasicOpVisitor
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
#region private state
|
|||
|
|
private Command m_command;
|
|||
|
|
#endregion
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#region constructors
|
|||
|
|
internal KeyPullup(Command command)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
m_command = command;
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
#endregion
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#region public methods
|
|||
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|||
|
|
/// Pull up keys (if possible) for the given node
|
|||
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|||
|
|
/// <param name="node">node to pull up keys for</param>
|
|||
|
|
/// <returns>Keys for the node</returns>
|
|||
|
|
internal KeyVec GetKeys(Node node)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
ExtendedNodeInfo nodeInfo = node.GetExtendedNodeInfo(m_command);
|
|||
|
|
if (nodeInfo.Keys.NoKeys)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
VisitNode(node);
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
return nodeInfo.Keys;
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#endregion
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#region private methods
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#region Visitor Methods
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#region general helpers
|
|||
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|||
|
|
/// Default visitor for children. Simply visit all children, and
|
|||
|
|
/// try to get keys for those nodes (relops, physicalOps) that
|
|||
|
|
/// don't have keys as yet.
|
|||
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|||
|
|
/// <param name="n">Current node</param>
|
|||
|
|
protected override void VisitChildren(Node n)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
foreach (Node chi in n.Children)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
if (chi.Op.IsRelOp || chi.Op.IsPhysicalOp)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
GetKeys(chi);
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
#endregion
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#region RelOp Visitors
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|||
|
|
/// Default visitor for RelOps. Simply visits the children, and
|
|||
|
|
/// then tries to recompute the NodeInfo (with the fond hope that
|
|||
|
|
/// some keys have now shown up)
|
|||
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|||
|
|
/// <param name="op"></param>
|
|||
|
|
/// <param name="n"></param>
|
|||
|
|
protected override void VisitRelOpDefault(RelOp op, Node n)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
VisitChildren(n);
|
|||
|
|
m_command.RecomputeNodeInfo(n);
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|||
|
|
/// Visitor for a ScanTableOp. Simply ensures that the keys get
|
|||
|
|
/// added to the list of referenced columns
|
|||
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|||
|
|
/// <param name="op">current ScanTableOp</param>
|
|||
|
|
/// <param name="n">current subtree</param>
|
|||
|
|
public override void Visit(ScanTableOp op, Node n)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
// find the keys of the table. Make sure that they are
|
|||
|
|
// all references
|
|||
|
|
op.Table.ReferencedColumns.Or(op.Table.Keys);
|
|||
|
|
// recompute the nodeinfo - keys won't get picked up otherwise
|
|||
|
|
m_command.RecomputeNodeInfo(n);
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|||
|
|
/// Pulls up keys for a ProjectOp. First visits its children to pull
|
|||
|
|
/// up its keys; then identifies any keys from the input that it may have
|
|||
|
|
/// projected out - and adds them to the output list of vars
|
|||
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|||
|
|
/// <param name="op">Current ProjectOp</param>
|
|||
|
|
/// <param name="n">Current subtree</param>
|
|||
|
|
public override void Visit(ProjectOp op, Node n)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
VisitChildren(n);
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
ExtendedNodeInfo childNodeInfo = n.Child0.GetExtendedNodeInfo(m_command);
|
|||
|
|
if (!childNodeInfo.Keys.NoKeys)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
VarVec outputVars = m_command.CreateVarVec(op.Outputs);
|
|||
|
|
// NOTE: This code appears in NodeInfoVisitor as well. Try to see if we
|
|||
|
|
// can share this somehow.
|
|||
|
|
Dictionary<Var, Var> varRenameMap = NodeInfoVisitor.ComputeVarRemappings(n.Child1);
|
|||
|
|
VarVec mappedKeyVec = childNodeInfo.Keys.KeyVars.Remap(varRenameMap);
|
|||
|
|
outputVars.Or(mappedKeyVec);
|
|||
|
|
op.Outputs.InitFrom(outputVars);
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
m_command.RecomputeNodeInfo(n);
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|||
|
|
/// Comments from Murali:
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// There are several cases to consider here.
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// Case 0:
|
|||
|
|
/// Let<65>s assume that K1 is the set of keys ({k1, k2, ..., kn}) for the
|
|||
|
|
/// first input, and K2 ({l1, l2, <20>}) is the set of keys for the second
|
|||
|
|
/// input.
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// The best case is when both K1 and K2 have the same cardinality (hopefully
|
|||
|
|
/// greater than 0), and the keys are in the same locations (ie) the corresponding
|
|||
|
|
/// positions in the select-list. Even in this case, its not enough to take
|
|||
|
|
/// the keys, and treat them as the keys of the union-all. What we<77>ll need to
|
|||
|
|
/// do is to add a <20>branch<63> discriminator constant for each branch of the
|
|||
|
|
/// union-all, and use this as the prefix for the keys.
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// For example, if I had:
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// Select c1, c2, c3... from ...
|
|||
|
|
/// Union all
|
|||
|
|
/// Select d1, d2, d3... from ...
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// And for the sake of argument, lets say that {c2} and {d2} are the keys of
|
|||
|
|
/// each of the branches. What you<6F>ll need to do is to translate this into
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// Select 0 as bd, c1, c2, c3... from ...
|
|||
|
|
/// Union all
|
|||
|
|
/// Select 1 as bd, d1, d2, d3... from ...
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// And then treat {bd, c2/d2} as the key of the union-all
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// Case 1: (actually, a subcase of Case 0):
|
|||
|
|
/// Now, if the keys don<6F>t align, then we can simply take the union of the
|
|||
|
|
/// corresponding positions, and make them all the keys (we would still need
|
|||
|
|
/// the branch discriminator)
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// Case 2:
|
|||
|
|
/// Finally, if you need to <20>pull<6C> up keys from either of the branches, it is
|
|||
|
|
/// possible that the branches get out of whack. We will then need to push up
|
|||
|
|
/// the keys (with nulls if the other branch doesn<73>t have the corresponding key)
|
|||
|
|
/// into the union-all. (We still need the branch discriminator).
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// Now, unfortunately, whenever we've got polymorphic entity types, we'll end up
|
|||
|
|
/// in case 2 way more often than we really want to, because when we're pulling up
|
|||
|
|
/// keys, we don't want to reason about a caseop (which is how polymorphic types
|
|||
|
|
/// wrap their key value).
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// To simplify all of this, we:
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// (1) Pulling up the keys for both branches of the UnionAll, and computing which
|
|||
|
|
/// keys are in the outputs and which are missing from the outputs.
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// (2) Accumulate all the missing keys.
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// (3) Slap a projectOp around each branch, adding a branch discriminator
|
|||
|
|
/// var and all the missing keys. When keys are missing from a different
|
|||
|
|
/// branch, we'll construct null ops for them on the other branches. If
|
|||
|
|
/// a branch already has a branch descriminator, we'll re-use it instead
|
|||
|
|
/// of constructing a new one. (Of course, if there aren't any keys to
|
|||
|
|
/// add and it's already including the branch discriminator we won't
|
|||
|
|
/// need the projectOp)
|
|||
|
|
///
|
|||
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|||
|
|
/// <param name="op">the UnionAllOp</param>
|
|||
|
|
/// <param name="n">current subtree</param>
|
|||
|
|
public override void Visit(UnionAllOp op, Node n)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
#if DEBUG
|
|||
|
|
string input = Dump.ToXml(m_command, n);
|
|||
|
|
#endif //DEBUG
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// Ensure we have keys pulled up on each branch of the union all.
|
|||
|
|
VisitChildren(n);
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// Create the setOp var we'll use to output the branch discriminator value; if
|
|||
|
|
// any of the branches are already surfacing a branchDiscriminator var to the
|
|||
|
|
// output of this operation then we won't need to use this but we construct it
|
|||
|
|
// early to simplify logic.
|
|||
|
|
Var outputBranchDiscriminatorVar = m_command.CreateSetOpVar(m_command.IntegerType);
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// Now ensure that we're outputting the key vars from this op as well.
|
|||
|
|
VarList allKeyVarsMissingFromOutput = Command.CreateVarList();
|
|||
|
|
VarVec[] keyVarsMissingFromOutput = new VarVec[n.Children.Count];
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n.Children.Count; i++)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
Node branchNode = n.Children[i];
|
|||
|
|
ExtendedNodeInfo branchNodeInfo = m_command.GetExtendedNodeInfo(branchNode);
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// Identify keys that aren't in the output list of this operation. We
|
|||
|
|
// determine these by remapping the keys that are found through the node's
|
|||
|
|
// VarMap, which gives us the keys in the same "varspace" as the outputs
|
|||
|
|
// of the UnionAll, then we subtract out the outputs of this UnionAll op,
|
|||
|
|
// leaving things that are not in the output vars. Of course, if they're
|
|||
|
|
// not in the output vars, then we didn't really remap.
|
|||
|
|
VarVec existingKeyVars = branchNodeInfo.Keys.KeyVars.Remap(op.VarMap[i]);
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
keyVarsMissingFromOutput[i] = m_command.CreateVarVec(existingKeyVars);
|
|||
|
|
keyVarsMissingFromOutput[i].Minus(op.Outputs);
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// Special Case: if the branch is a UnionAll, it will already have it's
|
|||
|
|
// branch discriminator var added in the keys; we don't want to add that
|
|||
|
|
// a second time...
|
|||
|
|
if (OpType.UnionAll == branchNode.Op.OpType)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
UnionAllOp branchUnionAllOp = (UnionAllOp)branchNode.Op;
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
keyVarsMissingFromOutput[i].Clear(branchUnionAllOp.BranchDiscriminator);
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
allKeyVarsMissingFromOutput.AddRange(keyVarsMissingFromOutput[i]);
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// Construct the setOp vars we're going to map to output.
|
|||
|
|
VarList allKeyVarsToAddToOutput = Command.CreateVarList();
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
foreach (Var v in allKeyVarsMissingFromOutput)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
Var newKeyVar = m_command.CreateSetOpVar(v.Type);
|
|||
|
|
allKeyVarsToAddToOutput.Add(newKeyVar);
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// Now that we've identified all the keys we need to add, ensure that each branch
|
|||
|
|
// has both the branch discrimination var and the all the keys in them, even when
|
|||
|
|
// the keys are just going to null (which we construct, as needed)
|
|||
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n.Children.Count; i++)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
Node branchNode = n.Children[i];
|
|||
|
|
ExtendedNodeInfo branchNodeInfo = m_command.GetExtendedNodeInfo(branchNode);
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
VarVec branchOutputVars = m_command.CreateVarVec();
|
|||
|
|
List<Node> varDefNodes = new List<Node>();
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// If the branch is a UnionAllOp that has a branch discriminator var then we can
|
|||
|
|
// use it, otherwise we'll construct a new integer constant with the next value
|
|||
|
|
// of the branch discriminator value from the command object.
|
|||
|
|
Var branchDiscriminatorVar;
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
if (OpType.UnionAll == branchNode.Op.OpType && null != ((UnionAllOp)branchNode.Op).BranchDiscriminator)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
branchDiscriminatorVar = ((UnionAllOp)branchNode.Op).BranchDiscriminator;
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// If the branch has a discriminator var, but we haven't added it to the
|
|||
|
|
// varmap yet, then we do so now.
|
|||
|
|
if (!op.VarMap[i].ContainsValue(branchDiscriminatorVar))
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
op.VarMap[i].Add(outputBranchDiscriminatorVar, branchDiscriminatorVar);
|
|||
|
|
// We don't need to add this to the branch outputs, because it's already there,
|
|||
|
|
// otherwise we wouln't have gotten here, yes?
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
else
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
// In this case, we're already outputting the branch discriminator var -- we'll
|
|||
|
|
// just use it for both sides. We should never have a case where only one of the
|
|||
|
|
// two branches are outputting the branch discriminator var, because it can only
|
|||
|
|
// be constructed in this method, and we wouldn't need it for any other purpose.
|
|||
|
|
PlanCompiler.Assert(0 == i, "right branch has a discriminator var that the left branch doesn't have?");
|
|||
|
|
VarMap reverseVarMap = op.VarMap[i].GetReverseMap();
|
|||
|
|
outputBranchDiscriminatorVar = reverseVarMap[branchDiscriminatorVar];
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
else
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
// Not a unionAll -- we have to add a BranchDiscriminator var.
|
|||
|
|
varDefNodes.Add(
|
|||
|
|
m_command.CreateVarDefNode(
|
|||
|
|
m_command.CreateNode(
|
|||
|
|
m_command.CreateConstantOp(m_command.IntegerType, m_command.NextBranchDiscriminatorValue)), out branchDiscriminatorVar));
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
branchOutputVars.Set(branchDiscriminatorVar);
|
|||
|
|
op.VarMap[i].Add(outputBranchDiscriminatorVar, branchDiscriminatorVar);
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// Append all the missing keys to the branch outputs. If the missing key
|
|||
|
|
// is not from this branch then create a null.
|
|||
|
|
for (int j = 0; j < allKeyVarsMissingFromOutput.Count; j++)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
Var keyVar = allKeyVarsMissingFromOutput[j];
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
if (!keyVarsMissingFromOutput[i].IsSet(keyVar))
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
varDefNodes.Add(
|
|||
|
|
m_command.CreateVarDefNode(
|
|||
|
|
m_command.CreateNode(
|
|||
|
|
m_command.CreateNullOp(keyVar.Type)), out keyVar));
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
branchOutputVars.Set(keyVar);
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// In all cases, we're adding a key to the output so we need to update the
|
|||
|
|
// varmap.
|
|||
|
|
op.VarMap[i].Add(allKeyVarsToAddToOutput[j], keyVar);
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// If we got this far and didn't add anything to the branch, then we're done.
|
|||
|
|
// Otherwise we'll have to construct the new projectOp around the input branch
|
|||
|
|
// to add the stuff we've added.
|
|||
|
|
if (branchOutputVars.IsEmpty)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
// Actually, we're not quite done -- we need to update the key vars for the
|
|||
|
|
// branch to include the branch discriminator var we
|
|||
|
|
branchNodeInfo.Keys.KeyVars.Set(branchDiscriminatorVar);
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
else
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
PlanCompiler.Assert(varDefNodes.Count != 0, "no new nodes?");
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// Start by ensuring all the existing outputs from the branch are in the list.
|
|||
|
|
foreach (Var v in op.VarMap[i].Values)
|
|||
|
|
{
|
|||
|
|
branchOutputVars.Set(v);
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// Now construct a project op to project out everything we've added, and
|
|||
|
|
// replace the branchNode with it in the flattened ladder.
|
|||
|
|
n.Children[i] = m_command.CreateNode(m_command.CreateProjectOp(branchOutputVars),
|
|||
|
|
branchNode,
|
|||
|
|
m_command.CreateNode(m_command.CreateVarDefListOp(), varDefNodes));
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// Finally, ensure that we update the Key info for the projectOp to include
|
|||
|
|
// the original branch's keys, along with the branch discriminator var.
|
|||
|
|
m_command.RecomputeNodeInfo(n.Children[i]);
|
|||
|
|
ExtendedNodeInfo projectNodeInfo = m_command.GetExtendedNodeInfo(n.Children[i]);
|
|||
|
|
projectNodeInfo.Keys.KeyVars.InitFrom(branchNodeInfo.Keys.KeyVars);
|
|||
|
|
projectNodeInfo.Keys.KeyVars.Set(branchDiscriminatorVar);
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// All done with the branches, now it's time to update the UnionAll op to indicate
|
|||
|
|
// that we've got a branch discriminator var.
|
|||
|
|
n.Op = m_command.CreateUnionAllOp(op.VarMap[0], op.VarMap[1], outputBranchDiscriminatorVar);
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
// Finally, the thing we've all been waiting for -- computing the keys. We cheat here and let
|
|||
|
|
// nodeInfo do it so we don't have to duplicate the logic...
|
|||
|
|
m_command.RecomputeNodeInfo(n);
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#if DEBUG
|
|||
|
|
input = input.Trim();
|
|||
|
|
string output = Dump.ToXml(m_command, n);
|
|||
|
|
#endif //DEBUG
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
#endregion
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#endregion
|
|||
|
|
#endregion
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
}
|