Compilation on cygwin, using gcc v3 with option -mno-cygwin,
currently produces a large number of the following warnings:
warning: `gnu_printf' is an unrecognized format function type
These have been introduced with the recent MinGW GNU C99 printf
compliance patch, as gnu_printf was only introduced with gcc v4.4
and is not recognized with earlier versions.
The attached fix adds gcc version detection to the previous patch
to avoid the problem.
Passing "--std=gun99" is unfortunately not sufficient to make current
MinGW compilers conform with respect to checking printf format strings.
(The C runtime seems not to have problems.)
Fix by using a "gnu_printf" format specifier not "printf".
Use JIM_WIDE_MODIFIER for the sscanf format, and apply it for MINGW32 as
well as other Windows environments. (Microsoft doesn't conform to the
C99 standard, and uses "%I64d" not "%lld" for "long long".)
NB: __MINGW32__ should work on both w32 and w64,.
Generate a C struct with the data, and use that, instead of an
assembly language file. The assembly language causes issues on
Darwin and MS-Windows, which don't necessarily use GNU AS; or
if they do, don't necessarily use its ELF syntax.
It's also better in two other ways: fewer global symbols; and
the init-time size check gets optimized away at compile time.
(Unless it fails, in which case bigger chunks of the file vanish.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Based on some patches from <redirect.slash.nil@gmail.com>
for preliminary Win64 compilation. More such updates are
needed, but they need work. Compile tested on 64 and 32 bit
Linuxes, and Cygwin.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
This makes the documentation a closer match to "help" output:
- "pathmove" somehow was not documented in the User's Guide
- "jtag_nsrst_assert_width" and "jtag_ntrst_assert_width"
are new; both needed descriptions.
- Removed two undocumented and fairly useless script mechanisms:
* production/production_info/production_test ... using it,
requires replacing everything; so having it adds no value.
* cpu ... way out of date; hopeless to keep that current
Note that anyone using that "production" stuff already defines
their own procedures, and can keep using them with no change.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Ofrwarded from Ron, who's not subscribed.
----- Forwarded message from Ron <ron@debian.org> -----
From: Ron <ron@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:50:17 +1030
To: wookey@debian.org
Subject: [PATCH] OpenRD board configuration
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=4.5 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
This piggybacks on the 'sheevaplug' layout which uses the same Kirkwood SoC.
Signed-off-by: Ron Lee <ron@debian.org>
The LE check is obviously buggy (as easily triggered during some
testing), but I didn't audit the rest of the cases.
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Cleanup comments and layout/whitespace in the TMS tables.
Table contents stayed the same (ignoring whitespace).
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
