Use labeled initializers in the table of layouts instead of
positional ones. This ls cleaner and less error prone, plus
it simplifies patches which add members to these structure.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Be a closer match to what I've actually done for the past few cycles.
In particular, hold off pushing repository updates until after the
packages are published, as part of opening the merge window, and
mention the utility commands which actually create the archives.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
When using an AP to access a memory (or a memory-mapped register),
some extra TCK (assuming JTAG) cycles should be added to ensure
the AP has enugh time to complete that access before trying to
collect the response.
The previous code was adding these cycles *before* trying to
access (read or write) data to that address, not *after*. Fix
by putting the delays in the right location.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
This removes context-sensitivity from the programming interface and makes
it possible to know what a block of code does without needing to know the
previous history (specifically, the DAP's "trans_mode" setting).
The mode was only set to ATOMIC briefly after DAP initialization, making
this patch be primarily cleanup; almost everything depends on COMPOSITE.
The transactions which shouldn't have been queued were already properly
flushing the queue.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
I have no idea what the scan_inout_check() was *expecting* to achieve by
issuing a read of the DP_RDBUFF register. But in any case, that code was
clearly never being called ("invalue" always NULL) ... so remove it, and
the associated comment.
Also rename it as ap_write_check(), facilitating a cleanup of its single
call site by removing constant parameters.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
adi_jtag_dp_scan_u32() now wraps adi_jtag_dp_scan(), removing
code duplication. Include doxygen for the former. Comment
some particularly relevant points. Minor fault handling fixes
for both routines: don't register a callback that can't run,
or return ERROR_OK after an error.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Pass up fault codes from various routines, so their callers
can clean up after failures, and remove the FIXME comments
highlighting those previously goofy code paths.
dap_ap_{read,write}_reg_u32()
dap_ap_write_reg()
mem_ap_{read,write}_u32()
mem_ap_{read,write}_atomic_u32()
dap_setup_accessport()
Make dap_ap_write_reg_u32() just wrap dap_ap_write_reg(),
instead of cloning its core code (and broken fault handling).
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Handling of AP (and AP register bank) selection, and cached AP
registers, is pretty loose ... start tightening it:
- It's "AP bank" select support ... there are no DP banks. Rename.
+ dap_dp_bankselect() becomes dap_ap_bankselect()
+ "dp_select_value" struct field becomes "ap_bank_value"
- Remove duplicate AP cache init paths ... only use dap_ap_select(),
and don't make Cortex (A8 or M3) cores roll their own code.
- For dap_ap_bankselect(), pass up any fault code from writing
the SELECT register. (Nothing yet checks those codes.)
- Add various bits of Doxygen
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Keep a handle to the PC in "struct arm", and use it.
This register is used a fair amount, so this is a net
minor code shrink (other than some line length fixes),
but mostly it's to make things more readable.
For XScale, fix a dodgy sequence while stepping. It
was initializing a variable to a non-NULL value, then
updating it to handle the step-over-active-breakpoint
case, and then later testing for non-NULL to see if
it should reverse that step-over-active logic. It
should have done like ARM7/ARM9 does: init to NULL.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Generalize the core of watchpoint setup so that it can handle
breakpoints too. Create breakpoint add/remove routines which
will use that, and hook them up to target types which don't
provide their own breakpoint support (nothing, yet).
This suffices for hardware-only breakpoint support. The ARM11
code will be able to switch over to this without much trouble,
since it doesn't yet handle software breakpoints. Switching
Cortex-A8 will be a bit more involved.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Address some FIXME comments by getting rid of globals, moving
per-core parameters in the existing per-core data structure.
This will matter most whenever there are multiple ARM11 cores,
e.g. ARM11 MPcore chips, but in general is just cleanup.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
This sets up a few of the core "struct arm" data structures so they
can be used with ARMv7-M cores. Specifically, it:
- defines new ARM core_modes to match the microcontroller modes
(e.g. HANDLER not IRQ, and two types of thread mode);
- Establishes a new microcontroller "core_type", which can be
used to make sure v7-M (and v6-M) cores are handled right;
- adds "struct arm" to "struct armv7m" and arranges for the
target_to_armv7m() converter to use it;
- sets up the arm.core_cache and arm.cpsr values
- makes the Cortex-M3 code maintain arm.map and arm.core_mode.
This is currently set up as a parallel data structure, primarily to
minimize special cases for the semihosting support with microcontroller
profile cores.
Later patches can rip out the duplicative ARMv7-M support and start
reusing core ARM code.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Specifically the Linux issue of needing "udev" rules, and MS-Windows
needing driver configuration.
Also, update the existing udev note to use the correct name of that
rules file in the source tree.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
The recent patch to fixbreakpoints and dcache handling added
a bunch of overlong lines (80+ chars) ... shrink them, and do
the same to a few lines which were already overlong.
Also add a few FIXME comments to nudge (a) replacement of some
magic numbers with opcode macros, which will be much better at
showing what's actually going on, and (b) correct return codes.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Get rid of new nasty warning:
NOTE! Severe performance degradation without fast memory access enabled...
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Fix an unused variable warning seen when building the parport driver
under FreeBSD.
Using information from Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Breakpoints did not work because the data cache was not flushed
properly.
As a bonus add capability to write to memory marked as read only
by the MMU, which allows software breakpoints in such memory
regions.
For folk who don't know the ARM920 JTAG interface very well, the
two modes of scan chain 15 access to CP15 are confusing.
Make those parts of the ARM920 code less opaque, by:
- Adding comments referencing the relevant parts of the TRM,
catching up to similar updates in the User's Guide.
- Replacing magic numbers in physical access clients with
symbolic equivalents.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Cortex-M targets don't support ARM instructions.
Leave the NVIC.VTOR setup alone, but comment how the whole
routine looks like one big bug...
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
When a DSP563xx-aware GDB asks OpenOCD for target registers,
the result should be a GDB with register data ... not an
OpenOCD crash.
(Note that mainline GDB doesn't currently support this core,
so for now, this requires a GDB with FreeScale patches.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Removed remaining support for various commands, like advice for
migrating old-style TAP declarations.
The documentation no longer describes them either ... so if users have
been delaying config updates, they may need to consult older releases.
ALL this stuff has been clearly marked as "do not use" for at least a
year now, so anyone still using it hasn't been holding up their end.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
