Define two new DAP operations which use the new jtag_add_tms_seq()
calls to put the DAP's transport into either SWD or JTAG mode, when
the hardware allows.
Tested with the Stellaris 'Recovering a "Locked" Device' procedure,
which loops five times over both of these.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Implement the new TMS_SEQ command on FT2232 hardware.
Also, swap a bogus exit() call with a clean failure return.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
For support of SWD we need to be able to clock out special bit
sequences over TMS or SWDIO. Create this as a generic operation,
not yet called by anything, which is split as usual into:
- upper level abstraction ... here, jtag_add_tms_seq();
- midlayer implementation logic hooking that to the lowlevel code;
- lowlevel minidriver operation ... here, interface_add_tms_seq();
- message type for request queue, here JTAG_TMS.
This is done slightly differently than other operations: there's a flag
saying whether the interface driver supports this request. (In fact a
flag *word* so upper layers can learn about other capabilities too ...
for example, supporting SWD operations.)
That approach (flag) lets this method *eventually* be used to eliminate
pathmove() and statemove() support from most adapter drivers, by moving
all that logic into the mid-layer and increasing uniformity between the
various drivers. (Which will in turn reduce subtle bugginess.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
FT2232-family chips have two or more MPSSE modules. FTDI documentation
calls these channels. JTAG adapter drivers thus need to be able to choose
which channel to use. (For example, one channel may connect to a board's
microcontroller, while another connects to a CPLD.)
Since each channel has its own USB interface, libftdi (somewhat confusingly)
identifies channels using INTERFACE_* symbols. Most boards use INTERFACE_A
for JTAG, which is the default in OpenOCD. But some wire up a different one.
Note that there are two facets of what makes a wiring "layout":
- The mapping between debug signals map and channel signals ... embedded
in C functions.
- Label used in Tcl configuration scripts ... part of the "layout" structure.
By letting the channel be part of the layout struct, we permit sharing the C
functions between Tcl-visible layouts, when those signal mappings are reused.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
I have successfully programmed the AT90CAN128, based on the mega128
with some small modifications.
[ dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net: patch cleanup ]
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Highlight more of the internal JTAG-specific utilities, so it's
easier to identify code needing changes to become transport-neutral.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
zy1000 performance for GDB load went from 100kBytes/s
to 300kBytes/s @ 8 MHz by implementing the inner loop
of unack arm11 memory writes directly on top of the hw
fifo.
Profiling info:
78.57 0.77 0.77 arm11_run_instr_data_to_core_noack_inner
5.10 0.82 0.05 memcpy
4.08 0.86 0.04 jtag_tap_next_enabled
3.06 0.89 0.03 gdb_input
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
This allows minidrivers to e.g. hardware accelerate memory
writes.
Same trick as is used for arm7/9 dcc writes.
Added error propagation for memory transfer failures in
code rearrangement.
Also the JTAG end state is not updated until after
the memory write run is complete.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
Use labeled initializers in the table of layouts instead of
positional ones. This ls cleaner and less error prone, plus
it simplifies patches which add members to these structure.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Be a closer match to what I've actually done for the past few cycles.
In particular, hold off pushing repository updates until after the
packages are published, as part of opening the merge window, and
mention the utility commands which actually create the archives.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
When using an AP to access a memory (or a memory-mapped register),
some extra TCK (assuming JTAG) cycles should be added to ensure
the AP has enugh time to complete that access before trying to
collect the response.
The previous code was adding these cycles *before* trying to
access (read or write) data to that address, not *after*. Fix
by putting the delays in the right location.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
This removes context-sensitivity from the programming interface and makes
it possible to know what a block of code does without needing to know the
previous history (specifically, the DAP's "trans_mode" setting).
The mode was only set to ATOMIC briefly after DAP initialization, making
this patch be primarily cleanup; almost everything depends on COMPOSITE.
The transactions which shouldn't have been queued were already properly
flushing the queue.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
I have no idea what the scan_inout_check() was *expecting* to achieve by
issuing a read of the DP_RDBUFF register. But in any case, that code was
clearly never being called ("invalue" always NULL) ... so remove it, and
the associated comment.
Also rename it as ap_write_check(), facilitating a cleanup of its single
call site by removing constant parameters.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
adi_jtag_dp_scan_u32() now wraps adi_jtag_dp_scan(), removing
code duplication. Include doxygen for the former. Comment
some particularly relevant points. Minor fault handling fixes
for both routines: don't register a callback that can't run,
or return ERROR_OK after an error.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Pass up fault codes from various routines, so their callers
can clean up after failures, and remove the FIXME comments
highlighting those previously goofy code paths.
dap_ap_{read,write}_reg_u32()
dap_ap_write_reg()
mem_ap_{read,write}_u32()
mem_ap_{read,write}_atomic_u32()
dap_setup_accessport()
Make dap_ap_write_reg_u32() just wrap dap_ap_write_reg(),
instead of cloning its core code (and broken fault handling).
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Handling of AP (and AP register bank) selection, and cached AP
registers, is pretty loose ... start tightening it:
- It's "AP bank" select support ... there are no DP banks. Rename.
+ dap_dp_bankselect() becomes dap_ap_bankselect()
+ "dp_select_value" struct field becomes "ap_bank_value"
- Remove duplicate AP cache init paths ... only use dap_ap_select(),
and don't make Cortex (A8 or M3) cores roll their own code.
- For dap_ap_bankselect(), pass up any fault code from writing
the SELECT register. (Nothing yet checks those codes.)
- Add various bits of Doxygen
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Keep a handle to the PC in "struct arm", and use it.
This register is used a fair amount, so this is a net
minor code shrink (other than some line length fixes),
but mostly it's to make things more readable.
For XScale, fix a dodgy sequence while stepping. It
was initializing a variable to a non-NULL value, then
updating it to handle the step-over-active-breakpoint
case, and then later testing for non-NULL to see if
it should reverse that step-over-active logic. It
should have done like ARM7/ARM9 does: init to NULL.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Generalize the core of watchpoint setup so that it can handle
breakpoints too. Create breakpoint add/remove routines which
will use that, and hook them up to target types which don't
provide their own breakpoint support (nothing, yet).
This suffices for hardware-only breakpoint support. The ARM11
code will be able to switch over to this without much trouble,
since it doesn't yet handle software breakpoints. Switching
Cortex-A8 will be a bit more involved.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Address some FIXME comments by getting rid of globals, moving
per-core parameters in the existing per-core data structure.
This will matter most whenever there are multiple ARM11 cores,
e.g. ARM11 MPcore chips, but in general is just cleanup.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
This sets up a few of the core "struct arm" data structures so they
can be used with ARMv7-M cores. Specifically, it:
- defines new ARM core_modes to match the microcontroller modes
(e.g. HANDLER not IRQ, and two types of thread mode);
- Establishes a new microcontroller "core_type", which can be
used to make sure v7-M (and v6-M) cores are handled right;
- adds "struct arm" to "struct armv7m" and arranges for the
target_to_armv7m() converter to use it;
- sets up the arm.core_cache and arm.cpsr values
- makes the Cortex-M3 code maintain arm.map and arm.core_mode.
This is currently set up as a parallel data structure, primarily to
minimize special cases for the semihosting support with microcontroller
profile cores.
Later patches can rip out the duplicative ARMv7-M support and start
reusing core ARM code.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Specifically the Linux issue of needing "udev" rules, and MS-Windows
needing driver configuration.
Also, update the existing udev note to use the correct name of that
rules file in the source tree.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
