Save and display the address of the instruction which triggered the
watchpoint. Because of pipelining, that's well behind the PC value
when debug entry completes. (Example in a subroutine that had been
returned from...)
Remove unused A8 stuff, mostly watchpoint hooks from the header.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Except for USR/SYS mode, the labels for the shadowed SP and LR
registers were reversed. LR is r14; SP is r13. Fix.
This would not affect GDB users; GDB references are positional.
Only folk working directly with OpenOCD register values would
have noticed this bug.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Actually this should handle both breakpoints and watchpoints ... but
the DPM framework only handles watchpoints for now. Works on Beagle.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
This is a NOP unless the underlying core exposes two new methods, and
neither of the two cores using this (ARM11xx, Cortex-A8) do so yet.
This patch only updates those cores so they pass a flag saying whether
or not to update breakpoint and watchpoint status before resuming; and
removing some now-needless anti-segfault code from ARM11. Cortex-A8
didn't have that code ... yes, it segfaulted when setting watchpoints.
NOTE: this uses a slightly different strategy for setting/clearing
breakpoints than the ARM7/ARM9/etc code uses. It leaves them alone
unless it's *got* to change something, to speed halt/resume cycles
(including single stepping).
ALSO NOTE: this under-delivers for Cortex-A8, where regions with size
up to 2 GBytes can be watched ... it handles watchpoints which ARM11 can
also handle (size 1/2/4 bytes). Should get fixed later.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
In embedded hosts, the Jim interpreter can come from the
existing context rather than be created by OpenOCD.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
We don't need this code, now that the DPM code handles it.
Neither do we need the ARMv7-A CP15 operations; remove their
remnants too. And disable a mostly-needless diagnostic.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Instead of having separate ARM11 and Cortex-A8 implementations of
this code, have one shared implementation which just builds on the
existing "run instruction via R0" support.
This enables followup patches to remove that now-unused code from
those two drivers. (Patches to move the "mrc" and "mcr" code into
"struct arm" are due too ... MIPS and other cores do not support
those ARM-specific concepts.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Switch "mrc" and "mcr" commands to be toplevel ARM operations,
as they should initially have been.
Correct the usage message for both commands: it matches ARM
documentation (as one wants!) instead of reordering them to
match the funky mrc() and mcr() method usage (sigh).
For Cortex-A8: restore a line that got accidentally dropped,
so the secure monitor mode shadow registers will show again.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
The ARMv7-A code uses read_cp15() to access fault registers.
Instead, use DPM operations directly, passing in the relevant
MRC instructions.
This eliminates per-operation overhead (though it'll be hard
to observe, this is uncommon) and helps eliminate read_cp15().
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
There were two chunks of Cortex-A8 code which called the
ARMv7-A CP15 operations; get rid of them, helping prepare
to remove those methods completely:
- post_debug_entry() can use the mrc() method to read
its two registers.
- write_memory() can use dpm->instr_write_data_r0() to
flush the ICache and DCache ... doing it this way is
actually faster since it reduces per-write overhead.
Note that the mrc() method parameters are re-ordered with
respect to the ARM instruction documentation, so that part
can be confusing.
Cleaned up the layout and comments in those areas a bit.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
There is no particular reason to invoke jtag_interface_quit()
on the atexit() handler, it just makes the code more obtuse
and stops other legitimate usage of atexit().
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
