Since rb_insert_color() is part of the _public_ API, while the others are
purely internal, switch to be consistent with that.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Also switch it to use the same method of using off-tree nodes as
everyone else now does -- set them to point to themselves.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Seems like a strange requirement, but allegedly it was necessary for
struct address_space on CRIS, because it otherwise ended up being only
byte-aligned. It's harmless enough, and easier to just do it than to
prove it isn't necessary... although I really ought to dig out my etrax
board and test it some time.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
We only used a single bit for colour information, so having a whole
machine word of space allocated for it was a bit wasteful. Instead,
store it in the lowest bit of the 'parent' pointer, since that was
always going to be aligned anyway.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Observe rb_erase(), when the victim node 'old' has two children so
neither of the simple cases at the beginning are taken.
Observe that it effectively does an 'rb_next()' operation to find the
next (by value) node in the tree. That is; we go to the victim's
right-hand child and then follow left-hand pointers all the way
down the tree as far as we can until we find the next node 'node'. We
end up with 'node' being either the same immediate right-hand child of
'old', or one of its descendants on the far left-hand side.
For a start, we _know_ that 'node' has a parent. We can drop that check.
We also know that if 'node's parent is 'old', then 'node' is the
right-hand child of its parent. And that if 'node's parent is _not_
'old', then 'node' is the left-hand child of its parent.
So instead of checking for 'node->rb_parent == old' in one place and
also checking 'node's heritage separately when we're trying to change
its link from its parent, we can shuffle things around a bit and do
it like this...
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
They were abusing the rb_color field to mark nodes which weren't currently
on the tree. Fix that to use the same method as eventpoll did -- setting
the parent pointer to point back to itself. And use the appropriate
accessor macros for setting and reading the parent.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
This is in preparation for merging those fields into a single
'unsigned long', because using a whole machine-word for a single bit
of colour information is wasteful.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Correct the base address of the Realtek RTL8019AS chip on the Toshiba RBTX4938
board -- this should make the driver work at least when CONFIG_PCI is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Yuri Shpilevsky <yshpilevsky@ru.mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
for_each_cpu() actually iterates across all possible CPUs. We've had mistakes
in the past where people were using for_each_cpu() where they should have been
iterating across only online or present CPUs. This is inefficient and
possibly buggy.
We're renaming for_each_cpu() to for_each_possible_cpu() to avoid this in the
future.
This patch replaces for_each_cpu with for_each_possible_cpu.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This is back again. Offending patch is x86_64-mm-hotadd-reserve.patch
arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:435: error: conflicting types for 'add_memory'
include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:102: error: previous declaration of 'add_memory' was here
arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:435: error: conflicting types for 'add_memory'
include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:102: error: previous declaration of 'add_memory' was here
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Patch from Lennert Buytenhek
The irq2gpio array was recently converted from an array of ints to an
array of chars (by patch 3368/1.) However, this array contains elements
that are -1, and on ARM, the char type is unsigned by default, so this
patch broke the GPIO check in ixp4xx_set_irq_type.
Change the 'char' to be a 'signed char' to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@plexity.net>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>