mirror of
https://github.com/linux-msm/laptops-kernel.git
synced 2026-08-13 14:19:53 -07:00
Merge tag 'v6.15' into rdma.git for-next
Following patches need the RDMA rc branch since we are past the RC cycle now. Merge conflicts resolved based on Linux-next: - For RXE odp changes keep for-next version and fixup new places that need to call is_odp_mr() https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250422143019.500201bd@canb.auug.org.au https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250514122455.3593b083@canb.auug.org.au - irdma is keeping the while/kfree bugfix from -rc and the pf/cdev_info change from for-next https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250513130630.280ee6c5@canb.auug.org.au Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
This commit is contained in:
commit
ef2233850e
1920 files changed
+26848
-12876
No files matched your search
+37
-4
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- '__rq_for_each_bio'
|
||||
- '__shost_for_each_device'
|
||||
- '__sym_for_each'
|
||||
- '_for_each_counter'
|
||||
- 'apei_estatus_for_each_section'
|
||||
- 'ata_for_each_dev'
|
||||
- 'ata_for_each_link'
|
||||
@@ -141,11 +142,14 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'damon_for_each_target_safe'
|
||||
- 'damos_for_each_filter'
|
||||
- 'damos_for_each_filter_safe'
|
||||
- 'damos_for_each_ops_filter'
|
||||
- 'damos_for_each_ops_filter_safe'
|
||||
- 'damos_for_each_quota_goal'
|
||||
- 'damos_for_each_quota_goal_safe'
|
||||
- 'data__for_each_file'
|
||||
- 'data__for_each_file_new'
|
||||
- 'data__for_each_file_start'
|
||||
- 'def_for_each_cpu'
|
||||
- 'device_for_each_child_node'
|
||||
- 'device_for_each_child_node_scoped'
|
||||
- 'dma_fence_array_for_each'
|
||||
@@ -176,6 +180,7 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'drm_for_each_privobj'
|
||||
- 'drm_gem_for_each_gpuvm_bo'
|
||||
- 'drm_gem_for_each_gpuvm_bo_safe'
|
||||
- 'drm_gpusvm_for_each_range'
|
||||
- 'drm_gpuva_for_each_op'
|
||||
- 'drm_gpuva_for_each_op_from_reverse'
|
||||
- 'drm_gpuva_for_each_op_reverse'
|
||||
@@ -216,8 +221,10 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'for_each_active_dev_scope'
|
||||
- 'for_each_active_drhd_unit'
|
||||
- 'for_each_active_iommu'
|
||||
- 'for_each_active_irq'
|
||||
- 'for_each_active_route'
|
||||
- 'for_each_aggr_pgid'
|
||||
- 'for_each_alloc_capable_rdt_resource'
|
||||
- 'for_each_and_bit'
|
||||
- 'for_each_andnot_bit'
|
||||
- 'for_each_available_child_of_node'
|
||||
@@ -228,6 +235,7 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'for_each_btf_ext_rec'
|
||||
- 'for_each_btf_ext_sec'
|
||||
- 'for_each_bvec'
|
||||
- 'for_each_capable_rdt_resource'
|
||||
- 'for_each_card_auxs'
|
||||
- 'for_each_card_auxs_safe'
|
||||
- 'for_each_card_components'
|
||||
@@ -241,6 +249,7 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'for_each_cgroup_storage_type'
|
||||
- 'for_each_child_of_node'
|
||||
- 'for_each_child_of_node_scoped'
|
||||
- 'for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix'
|
||||
- 'for_each_clear_bit'
|
||||
- 'for_each_clear_bit_from'
|
||||
- 'for_each_clear_bitrange'
|
||||
@@ -296,6 +305,7 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'for_each_group_member_head'
|
||||
- 'for_each_hstate'
|
||||
- 'for_each_hwgpio'
|
||||
- 'for_each_hwgpio_in_range'
|
||||
- 'for_each_if'
|
||||
- 'for_each_inject_fn'
|
||||
- 'for_each_insn'
|
||||
@@ -304,6 +314,7 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'for_each_intid'
|
||||
- 'for_each_iommu'
|
||||
- 'for_each_ip_tunnel_rcu'
|
||||
- 'for_each_irq_desc'
|
||||
- 'for_each_irq_nr'
|
||||
- 'for_each_lang'
|
||||
- 'for_each_link_ch_maps'
|
||||
@@ -324,6 +335,8 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'for_each_missing_reg'
|
||||
- 'for_each_mle_subelement'
|
||||
- 'for_each_mod_mem_type'
|
||||
- 'for_each_mon_capable_rdt_resource'
|
||||
- 'for_each_mp_bvec'
|
||||
- 'for_each_net'
|
||||
- 'for_each_net_continue_reverse'
|
||||
- 'for_each_net_rcu'
|
||||
@@ -351,6 +364,7 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'for_each_node_by_name'
|
||||
- 'for_each_node_by_type'
|
||||
- 'for_each_node_mask'
|
||||
- 'for_each_node_numadist'
|
||||
- 'for_each_node_state'
|
||||
- 'for_each_node_with_cpus'
|
||||
- 'for_each_node_with_property'
|
||||
@@ -359,6 +373,8 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'for_each_of_allnodes'
|
||||
- 'for_each_of_allnodes_from'
|
||||
- 'for_each_of_cpu_node'
|
||||
- 'for_each_of_graph_port'
|
||||
- 'for_each_of_graph_port_endpoint'
|
||||
- 'for_each_of_pci_range'
|
||||
- 'for_each_old_connector_in_state'
|
||||
- 'for_each_old_crtc_in_state'
|
||||
@@ -372,9 +388,11 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'for_each_oldnew_plane_in_state_reverse'
|
||||
- 'for_each_oldnew_private_obj_in_state'
|
||||
- 'for_each_online_cpu'
|
||||
- 'for_each_online_cpu_wrap'
|
||||
- 'for_each_online_node'
|
||||
- 'for_each_online_pgdat'
|
||||
- 'for_each_or_bit'
|
||||
- 'for_each_page_ext'
|
||||
- 'for_each_path'
|
||||
- 'for_each_pci_bridge'
|
||||
- 'for_each_pci_dev'
|
||||
@@ -382,8 +400,10 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'for_each_physmem_range'
|
||||
- 'for_each_populated_zone'
|
||||
- 'for_each_possible_cpu'
|
||||
- 'for_each_possible_cpu_wrap'
|
||||
- 'for_each_present_blessed_reg'
|
||||
- 'for_each_present_cpu'
|
||||
- 'for_each_present_section_nr'
|
||||
- 'for_each_prime_number'
|
||||
- 'for_each_prime_number_from'
|
||||
- 'for_each_probe_cache_entry'
|
||||
@@ -396,6 +416,7 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'for_each_prop_dlc_cpus'
|
||||
- 'for_each_prop_dlc_platforms'
|
||||
- 'for_each_property_of_node'
|
||||
- 'for_each_rdt_resource'
|
||||
- 'for_each_reg'
|
||||
- 'for_each_reg_filtered'
|
||||
- 'for_each_reloc'
|
||||
@@ -434,10 +455,10 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'for_each_subelement_id'
|
||||
- 'for_each_sublist'
|
||||
- 'for_each_subsystem'
|
||||
- 'for_each_suite'
|
||||
- 'for_each_supported_activate_fn'
|
||||
- 'for_each_supported_inject_fn'
|
||||
- 'for_each_sym'
|
||||
- 'for_each_test'
|
||||
- 'for_each_thread'
|
||||
- 'for_each_token'
|
||||
- 'for_each_unicast_dest_pgid'
|
||||
@@ -499,8 +520,10 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'idr_for_each_entry_continue'
|
||||
- 'idr_for_each_entry_continue_ul'
|
||||
- 'idr_for_each_entry_ul'
|
||||
- 'iio_for_each_active_channel'
|
||||
- 'in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu'
|
||||
- 'in_dev_for_each_ifa_rtnl'
|
||||
- 'in_dev_for_each_ifa_rtnl_net'
|
||||
- 'inet_bind_bucket_for_each'
|
||||
- 'interval_tree_for_each_span'
|
||||
- 'intlist__for_each_entry'
|
||||
@@ -542,7 +565,6 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'list_for_each_prev'
|
||||
- 'list_for_each_prev_safe'
|
||||
- 'list_for_each_rcu'
|
||||
- 'list_for_each_reverse'
|
||||
- 'list_for_each_safe'
|
||||
- 'llist_for_each'
|
||||
- 'llist_for_each_entry'
|
||||
@@ -552,6 +574,7 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'map__for_each_symbol'
|
||||
- 'map__for_each_symbol_by_name'
|
||||
- 'mas_for_each'
|
||||
- 'mas_for_each_rev'
|
||||
- 'mci_for_each_dimm'
|
||||
- 'media_device_for_each_entity'
|
||||
- 'media_device_for_each_intf'
|
||||
@@ -561,10 +584,15 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'media_pipeline_for_each_entity'
|
||||
- 'media_pipeline_for_each_pad'
|
||||
- 'mlx5_lag_for_each_peer_mdev'
|
||||
- 'mptcp_for_each_subflow'
|
||||
- 'msi_domain_for_each_desc'
|
||||
- 'msi_for_each_desc'
|
||||
- 'mt_for_each'
|
||||
- 'nanddev_io_for_each_block'
|
||||
- 'nanddev_io_for_each_page'
|
||||
- 'neigh_for_each_in_bucket'
|
||||
- 'neigh_for_each_in_bucket_rcu'
|
||||
- 'neigh_for_each_in_bucket_safe'
|
||||
- 'netdev_for_each_lower_dev'
|
||||
- 'netdev_for_each_lower_private'
|
||||
- 'netdev_for_each_lower_private_rcu'
|
||||
@@ -604,11 +632,11 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'perf_evlist__for_each_entry_safe'
|
||||
- 'perf_evlist__for_each_evsel'
|
||||
- 'perf_evlist__for_each_mmap'
|
||||
- 'perf_evsel_for_each_per_thread_period_safe'
|
||||
- 'perf_hpp_list__for_each_format'
|
||||
- 'perf_hpp_list__for_each_format_safe'
|
||||
- 'perf_hpp_list__for_each_sort_list'
|
||||
- 'perf_hpp_list__for_each_sort_list_safe'
|
||||
- 'perf_tool_event__for_each_event'
|
||||
- 'plist_for_each'
|
||||
- 'plist_for_each_continue'
|
||||
- 'plist_for_each_entry'
|
||||
@@ -627,7 +655,6 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'rdma_for_each_block'
|
||||
- 'rdma_for_each_port'
|
||||
- 'rdma_umem_for_each_dma_block'
|
||||
- 'resort_rb__for_each_entry'
|
||||
- 'resource_list_for_each_entry'
|
||||
- 'resource_list_for_each_entry_safe'
|
||||
- 'rhl_for_each_entry_rcu'
|
||||
@@ -658,6 +685,7 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'shost_for_each_device'
|
||||
- 'sk_for_each'
|
||||
- 'sk_for_each_bound'
|
||||
- 'sk_for_each_bound_safe'
|
||||
- 'sk_for_each_entry_offset_rcu'
|
||||
- 'sk_for_each_from'
|
||||
- 'sk_for_each_rcu'
|
||||
@@ -680,7 +708,11 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'tb_property_for_each'
|
||||
- 'tcf_act_for_each_action'
|
||||
- 'tcf_exts_for_each_action'
|
||||
- 'test_suite__for_each_test_case'
|
||||
- 'tool_pmu__for_each_event'
|
||||
- 'ttm_bo_lru_for_each_reserved_guarded'
|
||||
- 'ttm_resource_manager_for_each_res'
|
||||
- 'udp_lrpa_for_each_entry_rcu'
|
||||
- 'udp_portaddr_for_each_entry'
|
||||
- 'udp_portaddr_for_each_entry_rcu'
|
||||
- 'usb_hub_for_each_child'
|
||||
@@ -691,6 +723,7 @@ ForEachMacros:
|
||||
- 'v4l2_m2m_for_each_src_buf_safe'
|
||||
- 'virtio_device_for_each_vq'
|
||||
- 'while_for_each_ftrace_op'
|
||||
- 'workloads__for_each'
|
||||
- 'xa_for_each'
|
||||
- 'xa_for_each_marked'
|
||||
- 'xa_for_each_range'
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -7,5 +7,5 @@ check-private-items = true
|
||||
disallowed-macros = [
|
||||
# The `clippy::dbg_macro` lint only works with `std::dbg!`, thus we simulate
|
||||
# it here, see: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11303.
|
||||
{ path = "kernel::dbg", reason = "the `dbg!` macro is intended as a debugging tool" },
|
||||
{ path = "kernel::dbg", reason = "the `dbg!` macro is intended as a debugging tool", allow-invalid = true },
|
||||
]
|
||||
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
|
||||
Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org>
|
||||
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
||||
Arun Kumar Neelakantam <quic_aneela@quicinc.com> <aneela@codeaurora.org>
|
||||
Asahi Lina <lina+kernel@asahilina.net> <lina@asahilina.net>
|
||||
Ashok Raj Nagarajan <quic_arnagara@quicinc.com> <arnagara@codeaurora.org>
|
||||
Ashwin Chaugule <quic_ashwinc@quicinc.com> <ashwinc@codeaurora.org>
|
||||
Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com> <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
|
||||
@@ -312,6 +313,7 @@ Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@gmail.com> <jglauber@cavium.com>
|
||||
Jan Kuliga <jtkuliga.kdev@gmail.com> <jankul@alatek.krakow.pl>
|
||||
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
|
||||
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> <jarkko@profian.com>
|
||||
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> <jarkko.sakkinen@opinsys.com>
|
||||
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> <jgg@mellanox.com>
|
||||
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> <jgg@nvidia.com>
|
||||
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
|
||||
@@ -322,6 +324,7 @@ Jayachandran C <c.jayachandran@gmail.com> <jchandra@broadcom.com>
|
||||
Jayachandran C <c.jayachandran@gmail.com> <jchandra@digeo.com>
|
||||
Jayachandran C <c.jayachandran@gmail.com> <jnair@caviumnetworks.com>
|
||||
<jean-philippe@linaro.org> <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
|
||||
Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@yoseli.org> <jeanmichel.hautbois@ideasonboard.com>
|
||||
Jean Tourrilhes <jt@hpl.hp.com>
|
||||
Jeevan Shriram <quic_jshriram@quicinc.com> <jshriram@codeaurora.org>
|
||||
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pretzel.yyz.us>
|
||||
@@ -438,12 +441,16 @@ Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@c0d3.blue> <ll@simonwunderlich.de>
|
||||
Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com> <leoli@freescale.com>
|
||||
Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com> <leo@zh-kernel.org>
|
||||
Lior David <quic_liord@quicinc.com> <liord@codeaurora.org>
|
||||
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com> <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
|
||||
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com> <loic.poulain@intel.com>
|
||||
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org> <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
|
||||
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> <lstoakes@gmail.com>
|
||||
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com> <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
|
||||
Luca Weiss <luca@lucaweiss.eu> <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
|
||||
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> <l.luba@partner.samsung.com>
|
||||
Luo Jie <quic_luoj@quicinc.com> <luoj@codeaurora.org>
|
||||
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev> <ioworker0@gmail.com>
|
||||
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev> <mingzhe.yang@ly.com>
|
||||
Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@mips.com> <macro@imgtec.com>
|
||||
Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@orcam.me.uk> <macro@linux-mips.org>
|
||||
Maharaja Kennadyrajan <quic_mkenna@quicinc.com> <mkenna@codeaurora.org>
|
||||
@@ -480,6 +487,7 @@ Matthias Fuchs <socketcan@esd.eu> <matthias.fuchs@esd.eu>
|
||||
Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org> <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
|
||||
Matthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@free.fr>
|
||||
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
|
||||
Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@kernel.org> <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
|
||||
Matt Ranostay <matt@ranostay.sg> <matt.ranostay@konsulko.com>
|
||||
Matt Ranostay <matt@ranostay.sg> <matt@ranostay.consulting>
|
||||
Matt Ranostay <matt@ranostay.sg> Matthew Ranostay <mranostay@embeddedalley.com>
|
||||
@@ -685,6 +693,8 @@ Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de> <simon.wunderlich@saxnet.de>
|
||||
Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de> <simon@open-mesh.com>
|
||||
Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de> <siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
|
||||
Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@quicinc.com> <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
|
||||
Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@kernel.org> <srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
|
||||
Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@kernel.org> <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
|
||||
Srinivas Ramana <quic_sramana@quicinc.com> <sramana@codeaurora.org>
|
||||
Sriram R <quic_srirrama@quicinc.com> <srirrama@codeaurora.org>
|
||||
Sriram Yagnaraman <sriram.yagnaraman@ericsson.com> <sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech>
|
||||
@@ -744,6 +754,7 @@ Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net> <tvrtko@ursulin.net>
|
||||
Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza> <tycho@tycho.ws>
|
||||
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> <tzungbi@google.com>
|
||||
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
|
||||
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> <ukleinek@baylibre.com>
|
||||
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
|
||||
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@strlen.de>
|
||||
Uwe Kleine-König <ukl@pengutronix.de>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2071,6 +2071,10 @@ S: 660 Harvard Ave. #7
|
||||
S: Santa Clara, CA 95051
|
||||
S: USA
|
||||
|
||||
N: Joonsoo Kim
|
||||
E: iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com
|
||||
D: Slab allocators
|
||||
|
||||
N: Kukjin Kim
|
||||
E: kgene@kernel.org
|
||||
D: Samsung S3C, S5P and Exynos ARM architectures
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ Description:
|
||||
|
||||
What: /sys/block/<disk>/diskseq
|
||||
Date: February 2021
|
||||
Contact: Matteo Croce <mcroce@microsoft.com>
|
||||
Contact: Matteo Croce <teknoraver@meta.com>
|
||||
Description:
|
||||
The /sys/block/<disk>/diskseq files reports the disk
|
||||
sequence number, which is a monotonically increasing
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -511,6 +511,7 @@ Description: information about CPUs heterogeneity.
|
||||
|
||||
What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities
|
||||
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/gather_data_sampling
|
||||
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/indirect_target_selection
|
||||
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/itlb_multihit
|
||||
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/l1tf
|
||||
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/mds
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
What: /sys/bus/hid/drivers/hid-appletb-kbd/<dev>/mode
|
||||
Date: September, 2023
|
||||
KernelVersion: 6.5
|
||||
Date: March, 2025
|
||||
KernelVersion: 6.15
|
||||
Contact: linux-input@vger.kernel.org
|
||||
Description:
|
||||
The set of keys displayed on the Touch Bar.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ Description: RO. Package current voltage in millivolt.
|
||||
|
||||
What: /sys/bus/pci/drivers/xe/.../hwmon/hwmon<i>/temp2_input
|
||||
Date: March 2025
|
||||
KernelVersion: 6.14
|
||||
KernelVersion: 6.15
|
||||
Contact: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
|
||||
Description: RO. Package temperature in millidegree Celsius.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ Description: RO. Package temperature in millidegree Celsius.
|
||||
|
||||
What: /sys/bus/pci/drivers/xe/.../hwmon/hwmon<i>/temp3_input
|
||||
Date: March 2025
|
||||
KernelVersion: 6.14
|
||||
KernelVersion: 6.15
|
||||
Contact: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
|
||||
Description: RO. VRAM temperature in millidegree Celsius.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1604,3 +1604,35 @@ Description:
|
||||
prevent the UFS from frequently performing clock gating/ungating.
|
||||
|
||||
The attribute is read/write.
|
||||
|
||||
What: /sys/bus/platform/drivers/ufshcd/*/device_lvl_exception_count
|
||||
What: /sys/bus/platform/devices/*.ufs/device_lvl_exception_count
|
||||
Date: March 2025
|
||||
Contact: Bao D. Nguyen <quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com>
|
||||
Description:
|
||||
This attribute is applicable to ufs devices compliant to the
|
||||
JEDEC specifications version 4.1 or later. The
|
||||
device_lvl_exception_count is a counter indicating the number of
|
||||
times the device level exceptions have occurred since the last
|
||||
time this variable is reset. Writing a 0 value to this
|
||||
attribute will reset the device_lvl_exception_count. If the
|
||||
device_lvl_exception_count reads a positive value, the user
|
||||
application should read the device_lvl_exception_id attribute to
|
||||
know more information about the exception.
|
||||
|
||||
The attribute is read/write.
|
||||
|
||||
What: /sys/bus/platform/drivers/ufshcd/*/device_lvl_exception_id
|
||||
What: /sys/bus/platform/devices/*.ufs/device_lvl_exception_id
|
||||
Date: March 2025
|
||||
Contact: Bao D. Nguyen <quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com>
|
||||
Description:
|
||||
Reading the device_lvl_exception_id returns the
|
||||
qDeviceLevelExceptionID attribute of the ufs device JEDEC
|
||||
specification version 4.1. The definition of the
|
||||
qDeviceLevelExceptionID is the ufs device vendor specific
|
||||
implementation. Refer to the device manufacturer datasheet for
|
||||
more information on the meaning of the qDeviceLevelExceptionID
|
||||
attribute value.
|
||||
|
||||
The attribute is read only.
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
What: /sys/kernel/reboot
|
||||
Date: November 2020
|
||||
KernelVersion: 5.11
|
||||
Contact: Matteo Croce <mcroce@microsoft.com>
|
||||
Contact: Matteo Croce <teknoraver@meta.com>
|
||||
Description: Interface to set the kernel reboot behavior, similarly to
|
||||
what can be done via the reboot= cmdline option.
|
||||
(see Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt)
|
||||
@@ -9,25 +9,25 @@ Description: Interface to set the kernel reboot behavior, similarly to
|
||||
What: /sys/kernel/reboot/mode
|
||||
Date: November 2020
|
||||
KernelVersion: 5.11
|
||||
Contact: Matteo Croce <mcroce@microsoft.com>
|
||||
Contact: Matteo Croce <teknoraver@meta.com>
|
||||
Description: Reboot mode. Valid values are: cold warm hard soft gpio
|
||||
|
||||
What: /sys/kernel/reboot/type
|
||||
Date: November 2020
|
||||
KernelVersion: 5.11
|
||||
Contact: Matteo Croce <mcroce@microsoft.com>
|
||||
Contact: Matteo Croce <teknoraver@meta.com>
|
||||
Description: Reboot type. Valid values are: bios acpi kbd triple efi pci
|
||||
|
||||
What: /sys/kernel/reboot/cpu
|
||||
Date: November 2020
|
||||
KernelVersion: 5.11
|
||||
Contact: Matteo Croce <mcroce@microsoft.com>
|
||||
Contact: Matteo Croce <teknoraver@meta.com>
|
||||
Description: CPU number to use to reboot.
|
||||
|
||||
What: /sys/kernel/reboot/force
|
||||
Date: November 2020
|
||||
KernelVersion: 5.11
|
||||
Contact: Matteo Croce <mcroce@microsoft.com>
|
||||
Contact: Matteo Croce <teknoraver@meta.com>
|
||||
Description: Don't wait for any other CPUs on reboot and
|
||||
avoid anything that could hang.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -22,3 +22,5 @@ are configurable at compile, boot or run time.
|
||||
srso
|
||||
gather_data_sampling
|
||||
reg-file-data-sampling
|
||||
rsb
|
||||
indirect-target-selection
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
|
||||
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
||||
|
||||
Indirect Target Selection (ITS)
|
||||
===============================
|
||||
|
||||
ITS is a vulnerability in some Intel CPUs that support Enhanced IBRS and were
|
||||
released before Alder Lake. ITS may allow an attacker to control the prediction
|
||||
of indirect branches and RETs located in the lower half of a cacheline.
|
||||
|
||||
ITS is assigned CVE-2024-28956 with a CVSS score of 4.7 (Medium).
|
||||
|
||||
Scope of Impact
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
- **eIBRS Guest/Host Isolation**: Indirect branches in KVM/kernel may still be
|
||||
predicted with unintended target corresponding to a branch in the guest.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Intra-Mode BTI**: In-kernel training such as through cBPF or other native
|
||||
gadgets.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier (IBPB)**: After an IBPB, indirect
|
||||
branches may still be predicted with targets corresponding to direct branches
|
||||
executed prior to the IBPB. This is fixed by the IPU 2025.1 microcode, which
|
||||
should be available via distro updates. Alternatively microcode can be
|
||||
obtained from Intel's github repository [#f1]_.
|
||||
|
||||
Affected CPUs
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
Below is the list of ITS affected CPUs [#f2]_ [#f3]_:
|
||||
|
||||
======================== ============ ==================== ===============
|
||||
Common name Family_Model eIBRS Intra-mode BTI
|
||||
Guest/Host Isolation
|
||||
======================== ============ ==================== ===============
|
||||
SKYLAKE_X (step >= 6) 06_55H Affected Affected
|
||||
ICELAKE_X 06_6AH Not affected Affected
|
||||
ICELAKE_D 06_6CH Not affected Affected
|
||||
ICELAKE_L 06_7EH Not affected Affected
|
||||
TIGERLAKE_L 06_8CH Not affected Affected
|
||||
TIGERLAKE 06_8DH Not affected Affected
|
||||
KABYLAKE_L (step >= 12) 06_8EH Affected Affected
|
||||
KABYLAKE (step >= 13) 06_9EH Affected Affected
|
||||
COMETLAKE 06_A5H Affected Affected
|
||||
COMETLAKE_L 06_A6H Affected Affected
|
||||
ROCKETLAKE 06_A7H Not affected Affected
|
||||
======================== ============ ==================== ===============
|
||||
|
||||
- All affected CPUs enumerate Enhanced IBRS feature.
|
||||
- IBPB isolation is affected on all ITS affected CPUs, and need a microcode
|
||||
update for mitigation.
|
||||
- None of the affected CPUs enumerate BHI_CTRL which was introduced in Golden
|
||||
Cove (Alder Lake and Sapphire Rapids). This can help guests to determine the
|
||||
host's affected status.
|
||||
- Intel Atom CPUs are not affected by ITS.
|
||||
|
||||
Mitigation
|
||||
----------
|
||||
As only the indirect branches and RETs that have their last byte of instruction
|
||||
in the lower half of the cacheline are vulnerable to ITS, the basic idea behind
|
||||
the mitigation is to not allow indirect branches in the lower half.
|
||||
|
||||
This is achieved by relying on existing retpoline support in the kernel, and in
|
||||
compilers. ITS-vulnerable retpoline sites are runtime patched to point to newly
|
||||
added ITS-safe thunks. These safe thunks consists of indirect branch in the
|
||||
second half of the cacheline. Not all retpoline sites are patched to thunks, if
|
||||
a retpoline site is evaluated to be ITS-safe, it is replaced with an inline
|
||||
indirect branch.
|
||||
|
||||
Dynamic thunks
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
From a dynamically allocated pool of safe-thunks, each vulnerable site is
|
||||
replaced with a new thunk, such that they get a unique address. This could
|
||||
improve the branch prediction accuracy. Also, it is a defense-in-depth measure
|
||||
against aliasing.
|
||||
|
||||
Note, for simplicity, indirect branches in eBPF programs are always replaced
|
||||
with a jump to a static thunk in __x86_indirect_its_thunk_array. If required,
|
||||
in future this can be changed to use dynamic thunks.
|
||||
|
||||
All vulnerable RETs are replaced with a static thunk, they do not use dynamic
|
||||
thunks. This is because RETs get their prediction from RSB mostly that does not
|
||||
depend on source address. RETs that underflow RSB may benefit from dynamic
|
||||
thunks. But, RETs significantly outnumber indirect branches, and any benefit
|
||||
from a unique source address could be outweighed by the increased icache
|
||||
footprint and iTLB pressure.
|
||||
|
||||
Retpoline
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
Retpoline sequence also mitigates ITS-unsafe indirect branches. For this
|
||||
reason, when retpoline is enabled, ITS mitigation only relocates the RETs to
|
||||
safe thunks. Unless user requested the RSB-stuffing mitigation.
|
||||
|
||||
RSB Stuffing
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
RSB-stuffing via Call Depth Tracking is a mitigation for Retbleed RSB-underflow
|
||||
attacks. And it also mitigates RETs that are vulnerable to ITS.
|
||||
|
||||
Mitigation in guests
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
All guests deploy ITS mitigation by default, irrespective of eIBRS enumeration
|
||||
and Family/Model of the guest. This is because eIBRS feature could be hidden
|
||||
from a guest. One exception to this is when a guest enumerates BHI_DIS_S, which
|
||||
indicates that the guest is running on an unaffected host.
|
||||
|
||||
To prevent guests from unnecessarily deploying the mitigation on unaffected
|
||||
platforms, Intel has defined ITS_NO bit(62) in MSR IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES. When
|
||||
a guest sees this bit set, it should not enumerate the ITS bug. Note, this bit
|
||||
is not set by any hardware, but is **intended for VMMs to synthesize** it for
|
||||
guests as per the host's affected status.
|
||||
|
||||
Mitigation options
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
The ITS mitigation can be controlled using the "indirect_target_selection"
|
||||
kernel parameter. The available options are:
|
||||
|
||||
======== ===================================================================
|
||||
on (default) Deploy the "Aligned branch/return thunks" mitigation.
|
||||
If spectre_v2 mitigation enables retpoline, aligned-thunks are only
|
||||
deployed for the affected RET instructions. Retpoline mitigates
|
||||
indirect branches.
|
||||
|
||||
off Disable ITS mitigation.
|
||||
|
||||
vmexit Equivalent to "=on" if the CPU is affected by guest/host isolation
|
||||
part of ITS. Otherwise, mitigation is not deployed. This option is
|
||||
useful when host userspace is not in the threat model, and only
|
||||
attacks from guest to host are considered.
|
||||
|
||||
stuff Deploy RSB-fill mitigation when retpoline is also deployed.
|
||||
Otherwise, deploy the default mitigation. When retpoline mitigation
|
||||
is enabled, RSB-stuffing via Call-Depth-Tracking also mitigates
|
||||
ITS.
|
||||
|
||||
force Force the ITS bug and deploy the default mitigation.
|
||||
======== ===================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
Sysfs reporting
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
|
||||
The sysfs file showing ITS mitigation status is:
|
||||
|
||||
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/indirect_target_selection
|
||||
|
||||
Note, microcode mitigation status is not reported in this file.
|
||||
|
||||
The possible values in this file are:
|
||||
|
||||
.. list-table::
|
||||
|
||||
* - Not affected
|
||||
- The processor is not vulnerable.
|
||||
* - Vulnerable
|
||||
- System is vulnerable and no mitigation has been applied.
|
||||
* - Vulnerable, KVM: Not affected
|
||||
- System is vulnerable to intra-mode BTI, but not affected by eIBRS
|
||||
guest/host isolation.
|
||||
* - Mitigation: Aligned branch/return thunks
|
||||
- The mitigation is enabled, affected indirect branches and RETs are
|
||||
relocated to safe thunks.
|
||||
* - Mitigation: Retpolines, Stuffing RSB
|
||||
- The mitigation is enabled using retpoline and RSB stuffing.
|
||||
|
||||
References
|
||||
----------
|
||||
.. [#f1] Microcode repository - https://github.com/intel/Intel-Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-Files
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#f2] Affected Processors list - https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/topic-technology/software-security-guidance/processors-affected-consolidated-product-cpu-model.html
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#f3] Affected Processors list (machine readable) - https://github.com/intel/Intel-affected-processor-list
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
|
||||
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
||||
|
||||
=======================
|
||||
RSB-related mitigations
|
||||
=======================
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning::
|
||||
Please keep this document up-to-date, otherwise you will be
|
||||
volunteered to update it and convert it to a very long comment in
|
||||
bugs.c!
|
||||
|
||||
Since 2018 there have been many Spectre CVEs related to the Return Stack
|
||||
Buffer (RSB) (sometimes referred to as the Return Address Stack (RAS) or
|
||||
Return Address Predictor (RAP) on AMD).
|
||||
|
||||
Information about these CVEs and how to mitigate them is scattered
|
||||
amongst a myriad of microarchitecture-specific documents.
|
||||
|
||||
This document attempts to consolidate all the relevant information in
|
||||
once place and clarify the reasoning behind the current RSB-related
|
||||
mitigations. It's meant to be as concise as possible, focused only on
|
||||
the current kernel mitigations: what are the RSB-related attack vectors
|
||||
and how are they currently being mitigated?
|
||||
|
||||
It's *not* meant to describe how the RSB mechanism operates or how the
|
||||
exploits work. More details about those can be found in the references
|
||||
below.
|
||||
|
||||
Rather, this is basically a glorified comment, but too long to actually
|
||||
be one. So when the next CVE comes along, a kernel developer can
|
||||
quickly refer to this as a refresher to see what we're actually doing
|
||||
and why.
|
||||
|
||||
At a high level, there are two classes of RSB attacks: RSB poisoning
|
||||
(Intel and AMD) and RSB underflow (Intel only). They must each be
|
||||
considered individually for each attack vector (and microarchitecture
|
||||
where applicable).
|
||||
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
RSB poisoning (Intel and AMD)
|
||||
=============================
|
||||
|
||||
SpectreRSB
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
RSB poisoning is a technique used by SpectreRSB [#spectre-rsb]_ where
|
||||
an attacker poisons an RSB entry to cause a victim's return instruction
|
||||
to speculate to an attacker-controlled address. This can happen when
|
||||
there are unbalanced CALLs/RETs after a context switch or VMEXIT.
|
||||
|
||||
* All attack vectors can potentially be mitigated by flushing out any
|
||||
poisoned RSB entries using an RSB filling sequence
|
||||
[#intel-rsb-filling]_ [#amd-rsb-filling]_ when transitioning between
|
||||
untrusted and trusted domains. But this has a performance impact and
|
||||
should be avoided whenever possible.
|
||||
|
||||
.. DANGER::
|
||||
**FIXME**: Currently we're flushing 32 entries. However, some CPU
|
||||
models have more than 32 entries. The loop count needs to be
|
||||
increased for those. More detailed information is needed about RSB
|
||||
sizes.
|
||||
|
||||
* On context switch, the user->user mitigation requires ensuring the
|
||||
RSB gets filled or cleared whenever IBPB gets written [#cond-ibpb]_
|
||||
during a context switch:
|
||||
|
||||
* AMD:
|
||||
On Zen 4+, IBPB (or SBPB [#amd-sbpb]_ if used) clears the RSB.
|
||||
This is indicated by IBPB_RET in CPUID [#amd-ibpb-rsb]_.
|
||||
|
||||
On Zen < 4, the RSB filling sequence [#amd-rsb-filling]_ must be
|
||||
always be done in addition to IBPB [#amd-ibpb-no-rsb]_. This is
|
||||
indicated by X86_BUG_IBPB_NO_RET.
|
||||
|
||||
* Intel:
|
||||
IBPB always clears the RSB:
|
||||
|
||||
"Software that executed before the IBPB command cannot control
|
||||
the predicted targets of indirect branches executed after the
|
||||
command on the same logical processor. The term indirect branch
|
||||
in this context includes near return instructions, so these
|
||||
predicted targets may come from the RSB." [#intel-ibpb-rsb]_
|
||||
|
||||
* On context switch, user->kernel attacks are prevented by SMEP. User
|
||||
space can only insert user space addresses into the RSB. Even
|
||||
non-canonical addresses can't be inserted due to the page gap at the
|
||||
end of the user canonical address space reserved by TASK_SIZE_MAX.
|
||||
A SMEP #PF at instruction fetch prevents the kernel from speculatively
|
||||
executing user space.
|
||||
|
||||
* AMD:
|
||||
"Finally, branches that are predicted as 'ret' instructions get
|
||||
their predicted targets from the Return Address Predictor (RAP).
|
||||
AMD recommends software use a RAP stuffing sequence (mitigation
|
||||
V2-3 in [2]) and/or Supervisor Mode Execution Protection (SMEP)
|
||||
to ensure that the addresses in the RAP are safe for
|
||||
speculation. Collectively, we refer to these mitigations as "RAP
|
||||
Protection"." [#amd-smep-rsb]_
|
||||
|
||||
* Intel:
|
||||
"On processors with enhanced IBRS, an RSB overwrite sequence may
|
||||
not suffice to prevent the predicted target of a near return
|
||||
from using an RSB entry created in a less privileged predictor
|
||||
mode. Software can prevent this by enabling SMEP (for
|
||||
transitions from user mode to supervisor mode) and by having
|
||||
IA32_SPEC_CTRL.IBRS set during VM exits." [#intel-smep-rsb]_
|
||||
|
||||
* On VMEXIT, guest->host attacks are mitigated by eIBRS (and PBRSB
|
||||
mitigation if needed):
|
||||
|
||||
* AMD:
|
||||
"When Automatic IBRS is enabled, the internal return address
|
||||
stack used for return address predictions is cleared on VMEXIT."
|
||||
[#amd-eibrs-vmexit]_
|
||||
|
||||
* Intel:
|
||||
"On processors with enhanced IBRS, an RSB overwrite sequence may
|
||||
not suffice to prevent the predicted target of a near return
|
||||
from using an RSB entry created in a less privileged predictor
|
||||
mode. Software can prevent this by enabling SMEP (for
|
||||
transitions from user mode to supervisor mode) and by having
|
||||
IA32_SPEC_CTRL.IBRS set during VM exits. Processors with
|
||||
enhanced IBRS still support the usage model where IBRS is set
|
||||
only in the OS/VMM for OSes that enable SMEP. To do this, such
|
||||
processors will ensure that guest behavior cannot control the
|
||||
RSB after a VM exit once IBRS is set, even if IBRS was not set
|
||||
at the time of the VM exit." [#intel-eibrs-vmexit]_
|
||||
|
||||
Note that some Intel CPUs are susceptible to Post-barrier Return
|
||||
Stack Buffer Predictions (PBRSB) [#intel-pbrsb]_, where the last
|
||||
CALL from the guest can be used to predict the first unbalanced RET.
|
||||
In this case the PBRSB mitigation is needed in addition to eIBRS.
|
||||
|
||||
AMD RETBleed / SRSO / Branch Type Confusion
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
On AMD, poisoned RSB entries can also be created by the AMD RETBleed
|
||||
variant [#retbleed-paper]_ [#amd-btc]_ or by Speculative Return Stack
|
||||
Overflow [#amd-srso]_ (Inception [#inception-paper]_). The kernel
|
||||
protects itself by replacing every RET in the kernel with a branch to a
|
||||
single safe RET.
|
||||
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
RSB underflow (Intel only)
|
||||
==========================
|
||||
|
||||
RSB Alternate (RSBA) ("Intel Retbleed")
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Some Intel Skylake-generation CPUs are susceptible to the Intel variant
|
||||
of RETBleed [#retbleed-paper]_ (Return Stack Buffer Underflow
|
||||
[#intel-rsbu]_). If a RET is executed when the RSB buffer is empty due
|
||||
to mismatched CALLs/RETs or returning from a deep call stack, the branch
|
||||
predictor can fall back to using the Branch Target Buffer (BTB). If a
|
||||
user forces a BTB collision then the RET can speculatively branch to a
|
||||
user-controlled address.
|
||||
|
||||
* Note that RSB filling doesn't fully mitigate this issue. If there
|
||||
are enough unbalanced RETs, the RSB may still underflow and fall back
|
||||
to using a poisoned BTB entry.
|
||||
|
||||
* On context switch, user->user underflow attacks are mitigated by the
|
||||
conditional IBPB [#cond-ibpb]_ on context switch which effectively
|
||||
clears the BTB:
|
||||
|
||||
* "The indirect branch predictor barrier (IBPB) is an indirect branch
|
||||
control mechanism that establishes a barrier, preventing software
|
||||
that executed before the barrier from controlling the predicted
|
||||
targets of indirect branches executed after the barrier on the same
|
||||
logical processor." [#intel-ibpb-btb]_
|
||||
|
||||
* On context switch and VMEXIT, user->kernel and guest->host RSB
|
||||
underflows are mitigated by IBRS or eIBRS:
|
||||
|
||||
* "Enabling IBRS (including enhanced IBRS) will mitigate the "RSBU"
|
||||
attack demonstrated by the researchers. As previously documented,
|
||||
Intel recommends the use of enhanced IBRS, where supported. This
|
||||
includes any processor that enumerates RRSBA but not RRSBA_DIS_S."
|
||||
[#intel-rsbu]_
|
||||
|
||||
However, note that eIBRS and IBRS do not mitigate intra-mode attacks.
|
||||
Like RRSBA below, this is mitigated by clearing the BHB on kernel
|
||||
entry.
|
||||
|
||||
As an alternative to classic IBRS, call depth tracking (combined with
|
||||
retpolines) can be used to track kernel returns and fill the RSB when
|
||||
it gets close to being empty.
|
||||
|
||||
Restricted RSB Alternate (RRSBA)
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Some newer Intel CPUs have Restricted RSB Alternate (RRSBA) behavior,
|
||||
which, similar to RSBA described above, also falls back to using the BTB
|
||||
on RSB underflow. The only difference is that the predicted targets are
|
||||
restricted to the current domain when eIBRS is enabled:
|
||||
|
||||
* "Restricted RSB Alternate (RRSBA) behavior allows alternate branch
|
||||
predictors to be used by near RET instructions when the RSB is
|
||||
empty. When eIBRS is enabled, the predicted targets of these
|
||||
alternate predictors are restricted to those belonging to the
|
||||
indirect branch predictor entries of the current prediction domain.
|
||||
[#intel-eibrs-rrsba]_
|
||||
|
||||
When a CPU with RRSBA is vulnerable to Branch History Injection
|
||||
[#bhi-paper]_ [#intel-bhi]_, an RSB underflow could be used for an
|
||||
intra-mode BTI attack. This is mitigated by clearing the BHB on
|
||||
kernel entry.
|
||||
|
||||
However if the kernel uses retpolines instead of eIBRS, it needs to
|
||||
disable RRSBA:
|
||||
|
||||
* "Where software is using retpoline as a mitigation for BHI or
|
||||
intra-mode BTI, and the processor both enumerates RRSBA and
|
||||
enumerates RRSBA_DIS controls, it should disable this behavior."
|
||||
[#intel-retpoline-rrsba]_
|
||||
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
References
|
||||
==========
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#spectre-rsb] `Spectre Returns! Speculation Attacks using the Return Stack Buffer <https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.07940.pdf>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#intel-rsb-filling] "Empty RSB Mitigation on Skylake-generation" in `Retpoline: A Branch Target Injection Mitigation <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/retpoline-branch-target-injection-mitigation.html#inpage-nav-5-1>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#amd-rsb-filling] "Mitigation V2-3" in `Software Techniques for Managing Speculation <https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/processor-tech-docs/programmer-references/software-techniques-for-managing-speculation.pdf>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#cond-ibpb] Whether IBPB is written depends on whether the prev and/or next task is protected from Spectre attacks. It typically requires opting in per task or system-wide. For more details see the documentation for the ``spectre_v2_user`` cmdline option in Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt.
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#amd-sbpb] IBPB without flushing of branch type predictions. Only exists for AMD.
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#amd-ibpb-rsb] "Function 8000_0008h -- Processor Capacity Parameters and Extended Feature Identification" in `AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 3: General-Purpose and System Instructions <https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/processor-tech-docs/programmer-references/24594.pdf>`_. SBPB behaves the same way according to `this email <https://lore.kernel.org/5175b163a3736ca5fd01cedf406735636c99a>`_.
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#amd-ibpb-no-rsb] `Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution <https://comsec.ethz.ch/wp-content/files/ibpb_sp25.pdf>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#intel-ibpb-rsb] "Introduction" in `Post-barrier Return Stack Buffer Predictions / CVE-2022-26373 / INTEL-SA-00706 <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/advisory-guidance/post-barrier-return-stack-buffer-predictions.html>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#amd-smep-rsb] "Existing Mitigations" in `Technical Guidance for Mitigating Branch Type Confusion <https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/resources/technical-guidance-for-mitigating-branch-type-confusion.pdf>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#intel-smep-rsb] "Enhanced IBRS" in `Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/indirect-branch-restricted-speculation.html>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#amd-eibrs-vmexit] "Extended Feature Enable Register (EFER)" in `AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System Programming <https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/processor-tech-docs/programmer-references/24593.pdf>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#intel-eibrs-vmexit] "Enhanced IBRS" in `Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/indirect-branch-restricted-speculation.html>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#intel-pbrsb] `Post-barrier Return Stack Buffer Predictions / CVE-2022-26373 / INTEL-SA-00706 <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/advisory-guidance/post-barrier-return-stack-buffer-predictions.html>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#retbleed-paper] `RETBleed: Arbitrary Speculative Code Execution with Return Instruction <https://comsec.ethz.ch/wp-content/files/retbleed_sec22.pdf>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#amd-btc] `Technical Guidance for Mitigating Branch Type Confusion <https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/resources/technical-guidance-for-mitigating-branch-type-confusion.pdf>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#amd-srso] `Technical Update Regarding Speculative Return Stack Overflow <https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/corporate/cr/speculative-return-stack-overflow-whitepaper.pdf>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#inception-paper] `Inception: Exposing New Attack Surfaces with Training in Transient Execution <https://comsec.ethz.ch/wp-content/files/inception_sec23.pdf>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#intel-rsbu] `Return Stack Buffer Underflow / Return Stack Buffer Underflow / CVE-2022-29901, CVE-2022-28693 / INTEL-SA-00702 <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/advisory-guidance/return-stack-buffer-underflow.html>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#intel-ibpb-btb] `Indirect Branch Predictor Barrier' <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/indirect-branch-predictor-barrier.html>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#intel-eibrs-rrsba] "Guidance for RSBU" in `Return Stack Buffer Underflow / Return Stack Buffer Underflow / CVE-2022-29901, CVE-2022-28693 / INTEL-SA-00702 <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/advisory-guidance/return-stack-buffer-underflow.html>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#bhi-paper] `Branch History Injection: On the Effectiveness of Hardware Mitigations Against Cross-Privilege Spectre-v2 Attacks <http://download.vusec.net/papers/bhi-spectre-bhb_sec22.pdf>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#intel-bhi] `Branch History Injection and Intra-mode Branch Target Injection / CVE-2022-0001, CVE-2022-0002 / INTEL-SA-00598 <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/branch-history-injection.html>`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#intel-retpoline-rrsba] "Retpoline" in `Branch History Injection and Intra-mode Branch Target Injection / CVE-2022-0001, CVE-2022-0002 / INTEL-SA-00598 <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/branch-history-injection.html>`_
|
||||
@@ -1407,18 +1407,15 @@
|
||||
earlyprintk=serial[,0x...[,baudrate]]
|
||||
earlyprintk=ttySn[,baudrate]
|
||||
earlyprintk=dbgp[debugController#]
|
||||
earlyprintk=mmio32,membase[,{nocfg|baudrate}]
|
||||
earlyprintk=pciserial[,force],bus:device.function[,{nocfg|baudrate}]
|
||||
earlyprintk=xdbc[xhciController#]
|
||||
earlyprintk=bios
|
||||
earlyprintk=mmio,membase[,{nocfg|baudrate}]
|
||||
|
||||
earlyprintk is useful when the kernel crashes before
|
||||
the normal console is initialized. It is not enabled by
|
||||
default because it has some cosmetic problems.
|
||||
|
||||
Only 32-bit memory addresses are supported for "mmio"
|
||||
and "pciserial" devices.
|
||||
|
||||
Use "nocfg" to skip UART configuration, assume
|
||||
BIOS/firmware has configured UART correctly.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2205,6 +2202,23 @@
|
||||
different crypto accelerators. This option can be used
|
||||
to achieve best performance for particular HW.
|
||||
|
||||
indirect_target_selection= [X86,Intel] Mitigation control for Indirect
|
||||
Target Selection(ITS) bug in Intel CPUs. Updated
|
||||
microcode is also required for a fix in IBPB.
|
||||
|
||||
on: Enable mitigation (default).
|
||||
off: Disable mitigation.
|
||||
force: Force the ITS bug and deploy default
|
||||
mitigation.
|
||||
vmexit: Only deploy mitigation if CPU is affected by
|
||||
guest/host isolation part of ITS.
|
||||
stuff: Deploy RSB-fill mitigation when retpoline is
|
||||
also deployed. Otherwise, deploy the default
|
||||
mitigation.
|
||||
|
||||
For details see:
|
||||
Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/indirect-target-selection.rst
|
||||
|
||||
init= [KNL]
|
||||
Format: <full_path>
|
||||
Run specified binary instead of /sbin/init as init
|
||||
@@ -3696,6 +3710,7 @@
|
||||
expose users to several CPU vulnerabilities.
|
||||
Equivalent to: if nokaslr then kpti=0 [ARM64]
|
||||
gather_data_sampling=off [X86]
|
||||
indirect_target_selection=off [X86]
|
||||
kvm.nx_huge_pages=off [X86]
|
||||
l1tf=off [X86]
|
||||
mds=off [X86]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -124,6 +124,14 @@ When mounting an XFS filesystem, the following options are accepted.
|
||||
controls the size of each buffer and so is also relevant to
|
||||
this case.
|
||||
|
||||
lifetime (default) or nolifetime
|
||||
Enable data placement based on write life time hints provided
|
||||
by the user. This turns on co-allocation of data of similar
|
||||
life times when statistically favorable to reduce garbage
|
||||
collection cost.
|
||||
|
||||
These options are only available for zoned rt file systems.
|
||||
|
||||
logbsize=value
|
||||
Set the size of each in-memory log buffer. The size may be
|
||||
specified in bytes, or in kilobytes with a "k" suffix.
|
||||
@@ -143,6 +151,14 @@ When mounting an XFS filesystem, the following options are accepted.
|
||||
optional, and the log section can be separate from the data
|
||||
section or contained within it.
|
||||
|
||||
max_open_zones=value
|
||||
Specify the max number of zones to keep open for writing on a
|
||||
zoned rt device. Many open zones aids file data separation
|
||||
but may impact performance on HDDs.
|
||||
|
||||
If ``max_open_zones`` is not specified, the value is determined
|
||||
by the capabilities and the size of the zoned rt device.
|
||||
|
||||
noalign
|
||||
Data allocations will not be aligned at stripe unit
|
||||
boundaries. This is only relevant to filesystems created
|
||||
@@ -542,3 +558,24 @@ The interesting knobs for XFS workqueues are as follows:
|
||||
nice Relative priority of scheduling the threads. These are the
|
||||
same nice levels that can be applied to userspace processes.
|
||||
============ ===========
|
||||
|
||||
Zoned Filesystems
|
||||
=================
|
||||
|
||||
For zoned file systems, the following attributes are exposed in:
|
||||
|
||||
/sys/fs/xfs/<dev>/zoned/
|
||||
|
||||
max_open_zones (Min: 1 Default: Varies Max: UINTMAX)
|
||||
This read-only attribute exposes the maximum number of open zones
|
||||
available for data placement. The value is determined at mount time and
|
||||
is limited by the capabilities of the backing zoned device, file system
|
||||
size and the max_open_zones mount option.
|
||||
|
||||
zonegc_low_space (Min: 0 Default: 0 Max: 100)
|
||||
Define a percentage for how much of the unused space that GC should keep
|
||||
available for writing. A high value will reclaim more of the space
|
||||
occupied by unused blocks, creating a larger buffer against write
|
||||
bursts at the cost of increased write amplification. Regardless
|
||||
of this value, garbage collection will always aim to free a minimum
|
||||
amount of blocks to keep max_open_zones open for data placement purposes.
|
||||
@@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ target architecture, specifically, is the 32-bit OpenRISC 1000 family (or1k).
|
||||
|
||||
For information about OpenRISC processors and ongoing development:
|
||||
|
||||
======= =============================
|
||||
======= ==============================
|
||||
website https://openrisc.io
|
||||
email openrisc@lists.librecores.org
|
||||
======= =============================
|
||||
email linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org
|
||||
======= ==============================
|
||||
|
||||
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -27,11 +27,11 @@ Toolchain binaries can be obtained from openrisc.io or our github releases page.
|
||||
Instructions for building the different toolchains can be found on openrisc.io
|
||||
or Stafford's toolchain build and release scripts.
|
||||
|
||||
========== =================================================
|
||||
binaries https://github.com/openrisc/or1k-gcc/releases
|
||||
========== ==========================================================
|
||||
binaries https://github.com/stffrdhrn/or1k-toolchain-build/releases
|
||||
toolchains https://openrisc.io/software
|
||||
building https://github.com/stffrdhrn/or1k-toolchain-build
|
||||
========== =================================================
|
||||
========== ==========================================================
|
||||
|
||||
2) Building
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ The following keys are defined:
|
||||
* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MARCHID`: Contains the value of ``marchid``, as
|
||||
defined by the RISC-V privileged architecture specification.
|
||||
|
||||
* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MIMPLID`: Contains the value of ``mimplid``, as
|
||||
* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MIMPID`: Contains the value of ``mimpid``, as
|
||||
defined by the RISC-V privileged architecture specification.
|
||||
|
||||
* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR`: A bitmask containing the base
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -79,8 +79,9 @@ feature flags.
|
||||
How are feature flags created?
|
||||
==============================
|
||||
|
||||
a: Feature flags can be derived from the contents of CPUID leaves.
|
||||
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Feature flags can be derived from the contents of CPUID leaves
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
These feature definitions are organized mirroring the layout of CPUID
|
||||
leaves and grouped in words with offsets as mapped in enum cpuid_leafs
|
||||
in cpufeatures.h (see arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h for details).
|
||||
@@ -89,8 +90,9 @@ cpufeatures.h, and if it is detected at run time, the flags will be
|
||||
displayed accordingly in /proc/cpuinfo. For example, the flag "avx2"
|
||||
comes from X86_FEATURE_AVX2 in cpufeatures.h.
|
||||
|
||||
b: Flags can be from scattered CPUID-based features.
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Flags can be from scattered CPUID-based features
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Hardware features enumerated in sparsely populated CPUID leaves get
|
||||
software-defined values. Still, CPUID needs to be queried to determine
|
||||
if a given feature is present. This is done in init_scattered_cpuid_features().
|
||||
@@ -104,8 +106,9 @@ has only one feature and would waste 31 bits of space in the x86_capability[]
|
||||
array. Since there is a struct cpuinfo_x86 for each possible CPU, the wasted
|
||||
memory is not trivial.
|
||||
|
||||
c: Flags can be created synthetically under certain conditions for hardware features.
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Flags can be created synthetically under certain conditions for hardware features
|
||||
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Examples of conditions include whether certain features are present in
|
||||
MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS or specific CPU models are identified. If the needed
|
||||
conditions are met, the features are enabled by the set_cpu_cap or
|
||||
@@ -114,8 +117,8 @@ the feature X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT will be enabled and
|
||||
"split_lock_detect" will be displayed. The flag "ring3mwait" will be
|
||||
displayed only when running on INTEL_XEON_PHI_[KNL|KNM] processors.
|
||||
|
||||
d: Flags can represent purely software features.
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Flags can represent purely software features
|
||||
--------------------------------------------
|
||||
These flags do not represent hardware features. Instead, they represent a
|
||||
software feature implemented in the kernel. For example, Kernel Page Table
|
||||
Isolation is purely software feature and its feature flag X86_FEATURE_PTI is
|
||||
@@ -130,14 +133,18 @@ x86_cap/bug_flags[] arrays in kernel/cpu/capflags.c. The names in the
|
||||
resulting x86_cap/bug_flags[] are used to populate /proc/cpuinfo. The naming
|
||||
of flags in the x86_cap/bug_flags[] are as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
a: The name of the flag is from the string in X86_FEATURE_<name> by default.
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
By default, the flag <name> in /proc/cpuinfo is extracted from the respective
|
||||
X86_FEATURE_<name> in cpufeatures.h. For example, the flag "avx2" is from
|
||||
X86_FEATURE_AVX2.
|
||||
Flags do not appear by default in /proc/cpuinfo
|
||||
-----------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Feature flags are omitted by default from /proc/cpuinfo as it does not make
|
||||
sense for the feature to be exposed to userspace in most cases. For example,
|
||||
X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS is defined in cpufeatures.h but that flag is an internal
|
||||
kernel feature used in the alternative runtime patching functionality. So the
|
||||
flag does not appear in /proc/cpuinfo.
|
||||
|
||||
Specify a flag name if absolutely needed
|
||||
----------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
b: The naming can be overridden.
|
||||
--------------------------------
|
||||
If the comment on the line for the #define X86_FEATURE_* starts with a
|
||||
double-quote character (""), the string inside the double-quote characters
|
||||
will be the name of the flags. For example, the flag "sse4_1" comes from
|
||||
@@ -148,36 +155,31 @@ needed. For instance, /proc/cpuinfo is a userspace interface and must remain
|
||||
constant. If, for some reason, the naming of X86_FEATURE_<name> changes, one
|
||||
shall override the new naming with the name already used in /proc/cpuinfo.
|
||||
|
||||
c: The naming override can be "", which means it will not appear in /proc/cpuinfo.
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
The feature shall be omitted from /proc/cpuinfo if it does not make sense for
|
||||
the feature to be exposed to userspace. For example, X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS is
|
||||
defined in cpufeatures.h but that flag is an internal kernel feature used
|
||||
in the alternative runtime patching functionality. So, its name is overridden
|
||||
with "". Its flag will not appear in /proc/cpuinfo.
|
||||
|
||||
Flags are missing when one or more of these happen
|
||||
==================================================
|
||||
|
||||
a: The hardware does not enumerate support for it.
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------
|
||||
The hardware does not enumerate support for it
|
||||
----------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
For example, when a new kernel is running on old hardware or the feature is
|
||||
not enabled by boot firmware. Even if the hardware is new, there might be a
|
||||
problem enabling the feature at run time, the flag will not be displayed.
|
||||
|
||||
b: The kernel does not know about the flag.
|
||||
-------------------------------------------
|
||||
The kernel does not know about the flag
|
||||
---------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
For example, when an old kernel is running on new hardware.
|
||||
|
||||
c: The kernel disabled support for it at compile-time.
|
||||
------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
The kernel disabled support for it at compile-time
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
For example, if 5-level-paging is not enabled when building (i.e.,
|
||||
CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL is not selected) the flag "la57" will not show up [#f1]_.
|
||||
Even though the feature will still be detected via CPUID, the kernel disables
|
||||
it by clearing via setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_LA57).
|
||||
|
||||
d: The feature is disabled at boot-time.
|
||||
----------------------------------------
|
||||
The feature is disabled at boot-time
|
||||
------------------------------------
|
||||
A feature can be disabled either using a command-line parameter or because
|
||||
it failed to be enabled. The command-line parameter clearcpuid= can be used
|
||||
to disable features using the feature number as defined in
|
||||
@@ -190,8 +192,9 @@ disable specific features. The list of parameters includes, but is not limited
|
||||
to, nofsgsbase, nosgx, noxsave, etc. 5-level paging can also be disabled using
|
||||
"no5lvl".
|
||||
|
||||
e: The feature was known to be non-functional.
|
||||
----------------------------------------------
|
||||
The feature was known to be non-functional
|
||||
------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The feature was known to be non-functional because a dependency was
|
||||
missing at runtime. For example, AVX flags will not show up if XSAVE feature
|
||||
is disabled since they depend on XSAVE feature. Another example would be broken
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -382,6 +382,14 @@ In case of new BPF instructions, once the changes have been accepted
|
||||
into the Linux kernel, please implement support into LLVM's BPF back
|
||||
end. See LLVM_ section below for further information.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: What "BPF_INTERNAL" symbol namespace is for?
|
||||
-----------------------------------------------
|
||||
A: Symbols exported as BPF_INTERNAL can only be used by BPF infrastructure
|
||||
like preload kernel modules with light skeleton. Most symbols outside
|
||||
of BPF_INTERNAL are not expected to be used by code outside of BPF either.
|
||||
Symbols may lack the designation because they predate the namespaces,
|
||||
or due to an oversight.
|
||||
|
||||
Stable submission
|
||||
=================
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
|
||||
title: Ceva AHCI SATA Controller
|
||||
|
||||
maintainers:
|
||||
- Mubin Sayyed <mubin.sayyed@amd.com>
|
||||
- Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com>
|
||||
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
|
||||
Loaded 20 of 1920 files, more files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff.
Show more
Reference in new issue
Block a user