Add new firmware feature flags for the recently added confidential
computing operating modes by amd and intel.
While being at it also fix the path to the amd sev documentation.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220930133220.1771336-1-kraxel@redhat.com>
Let's use a more appropriate wording for this command line and config
file option. The old ones are still accepted for compatibility reasons,
but marked as deprecated now so that it could be removed in a future
version of QEMU.
This change is based on earlier patches from Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
with the idea for the new option name suggested by BALATON Zoltan.
And while we're at it, replace the "?" in the help text with "help"
since that does not have the problem of conflicting with the wildcard
character of the shells.
Message-Id: <20220727092135.302915-2-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Kostiuk <kkostiuk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
We have about 30 instances of the typo/variant spelling 'writeable',
and over 500 of the more common 'writable'. Standardize on the
latter.
Change produced with:
sed -i -e 's/\([Ww][Rr][Ii][Tt]\)[Ee]\([Aa][Bb][Ll][Ee]\)/\1\2/g' $(git grep -il writeable)
and then hand-undoing the instance in linux-headers/linux/kvm.h.
Most of these changes are in comments or documentation; the
exceptions are:
* a local variable in accel/hvf/hvf-accel-ops.c
* a local variable in accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
* the PMCR_WRITABLE_MASK macro in target/arm/internals.h
* the EPT_VIOLATION_GPA_WRITABLE macro in target/i386/hvf/vmcs.h
(which is never used anywhere)
* the AR_TYPE_WRITABLE_MASK macro in target/i386/hvf/vmx.h
(which is never used anywhere)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Message-id: 20220505095015.2714666-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The specification for VHOST_USER_ADD/REM_MEM_REG messages is unclear
in several points, which has led to clients having incompatible
implementations. This changes the specification to be more explicit
about them:
* VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG is not specified as receiving a file
descriptor, though it obviously does need to do so. All
implementations agree on this one, fix the specification.
* VHOST_USER_REM_MEM_REG is not specified as receiving a file
descriptor either, and it also has no reason to do so. rust-vmm does
not send file descriptors for removing a memory region (in agreement
with the specification), libvhost-user and QEMU do (which is a bug),
though libvhost-user doesn't actually make any use of it.
Change the specification so that for compatibility QEMU's behaviour
becomes legal, even if discouraged, but rust-vmm's behaviour becomes
the explicitly recommended mode of operation.
* VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG doesn't have a documented return value, which
is the desired behaviour in the non-postcopy case. It also implemented
like this in QEMU and rust-vmm, though libvhost-user is buggy and
sometimes sends an unexpected reply. This will be fixed in a separate
patch.
However, in postcopy mode it does reply like VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE.
This behaviour is shared between libvhost-user and QEMU; rust-vmm
doesn't implement postcopy mode yet. Mention it explicitly in the
spec.
* The specification doesn't mention how VHOST_USER_REM_MEM_REG
identifies the memory region to be removed. Change it to describe the
existing behaviour of libvhost-user (guest address, user address and
size must match).
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220407133657.155281-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
It is not necessary to mention which side is sending/receiving
each payload; it is more interesting to say which is the request
and which is the reply. This also matches what vhost-user-gpu.rst
already does.
While at it, ensure that all messages list both the request and
the reply payload.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210226143413.188046-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220321153037.3622127-5-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
According to the NBD spec, a server that advertises
NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN promises that multiple client connections will
not see any cache inconsistencies: when properly separated by a single
flush, actions performed by one client will be visible to another
client, regardless of which client did the flush.
We always satisfy these conditions in qemu - even when we support
multiple clients, ALL clients go through a single point of reference
into the block layer, with no local caching. The effect of one client
is instantly visible to the next client. Even if our backend were a
network device, we argue that any multi-path caching effects that
would cause inconsistencies in back-to-back actions not seeing the
effect of previous actions would be a bug in that backend, and not the
fault of caching in qemu. As such, it is safe to unconditionally
advertise CAN_MULTI_CONN for any qemu NBD server situation that
supports parallel clients.
Note, however, that we don't want to advertise CAN_MULTI_CONN when we
know that a second client cannot connect (for historical reasons,
qemu-nbd defaults to a single connection while nbd-server-add and QMP
commands default to unlimited connections; but we already have
existing means to let either style of NBD server creation alter those
defaults). This is visible by no longer advertising MULTI_CONN for
'qemu-nbd -r' without -e, as in the iotest nbd-qemu-allocation.
The harder part of this patch is setting up an iotest to demonstrate
behavior of multiple NBD clients to a single server. It might be
possible with parallel qemu-io processes, but I found it easier to do
in python with the help of libnbd, and help from Nir and Vladimir in
writing the test.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <v.sementsov-og@mail.ru>
Message-Id: <20220512004924.417153-3-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
The specification for VHOST_USER_ADD/REM_MEM_REG messages is unclear
in several points, which has led to clients having incompatible
implementations. This changes the specification to be more explicit
about them:
* VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG is not specified as receiving a file
descriptor, though it obviously does need to do so. All
implementations agree on this one, fix the specification.
* VHOST_USER_REM_MEM_REG is not specified as receiving a file
descriptor either, and it also has no reason to do so. rust-vmm does
not send file descriptors for removing a memory region (in agreement
with the specification), libvhost-user and QEMU do (which is a bug),
though libvhost-user doesn't actually make any use of it.
Change the specification so that for compatibility QEMU's behaviour
becomes legal, even if discouraged, but rust-vmm's behaviour becomes
the explicitly recommended mode of operation.
* VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG doesn't have a documented return value, which
is the desired behaviour in the non-postcopy case. It also implemented
like this in QEMU and rust-vmm, though libvhost-user is buggy and
sometimes sends an unexpected reply. This will be fixed in a separate
patch.
However, in postcopy mode it does reply like VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE.
This behaviour is shared between libvhost-user and QEMU; rust-vmm
doesn't implement postcopy mode yet. Mention it explicitly in the
spec.
* The specification doesn't mention how VHOST_USER_REM_MEM_REG
identifies the memory region to be removed. Change it to describe the
existing behaviour of libvhost-user (guest address, user address and
size must match).
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220407133657.155281-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
The current firmware descriptor schema for flash requires that both the
executable to NVRAM template paths be provided. This is fine for the
most common usage of EDK2 builds in virtualization where the separate
_CODE and _VARS files are provided.
With confidential computing technology like AMD SEV, persistent storage
of variables may be completely disabled because the firmware requires a
known clean state on every cold boot. There is no way to express this
in the firmware descriptor today.
Even with regular EDK2 builds it is possible to create a firmware that
has both executable code and variable persistence in a single file. This
hasn't been commonly used, since it would mean every guest bootup would
need to clone the full firmware file, leading to redundant duplicate
storage of the code portion. In some scenarios this may not matter and
might even be beneficial. For example if a public cloud allows users to
bring their own firmware, such that the user can pre-enroll their own
secure boot keys, you're going to have this copied on disk for each
tenant already. At this point the it can be simpler to just deal with
a single file rather than split builds. The firmware descriptor ought
to be able to express this combined firmware model too.
This all points towards expanding the schema for flash with a 'mode'
concept:
- "split" - the current implicit behaviour with separate files
for code and variables.
- "combined" - the alternate behaviour where a single file contains
both code and variables.
- "stateless" - the confidential computing use case where storage
of variables is completely disable, leaving only the code.
Reviewed-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
The virtio-balloon-stats documentation might be useful for people that
are implementing software that talks to QEMU via QMP, so this should
reside in the docs/interop/ directory. While we're at it, also convert
the file to restructured text and mention it in the MAINTAINERS file.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220105115245.420945-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Wire up the dbus-display documentation. The interface and feature is
implemented next.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Use the source XML document as single reference, importing its
documentation via the dbus-doc directive.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Modern way is using blockdev-add + blockdev-backup, which provides a
lot more control on how target is opened.
As example of drive-backup problems consider the following:
User of drive-backup expects that target will be opened in the same
cache and aio mode as source. Corresponding logic is in
drive_backup_prepare(), where we take bs->open_flags of source.
It works rather bad if source was added by blockdev-add. Assume source
is qcow2 image. On blockdev-add we should specify aio and cache options
for file child of qcow2 node. What happens next:
drive_backup_prepare() looks at bs->open_flags of qcow2 source node.
But there no BDRV_O_NOCAHE neither BDRV_O_NATIVE_AIO: BDRV_O_NOCAHE is
places in bs->file->bs->open_flags, and BDRV_O_NATIVE_AIO is nowhere,
as file-posix parse options and simply set s->use_linux_aio.
The documentation is updated in a minimal way, so that drive-backup is
noted only as a deprecated command, and blockdev-backup used in most of
places.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
We are going to deprecate drive-backup, so use modern interface here.
In examples where target image creation is shown, show blockdev-add as
well. If target creation omitted, omit blockdev-add as well.
Reviewed-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
The single backtick markup in ReST is the "default role". Currently,
Sphinx's default role is called "content". Sphinx suggests you can use
the "Any" role instead to turn any single-backtick enclosed item into a
cross-reference.
This is useful for things like autodoc for Python docstrings, where it's
often nicer to reference other types with `foo` instead of the more
laborious :py:meth:`foo`. It's also useful in multi-domain cases to
easily reference definitions from other Sphinx domains, such as
referencing C code definitions from outside of kerneldoc comments.
Before we do that, though, we'll need to turn all existing usages of the
"content" role to inline verbatim markup wherever it does not correctly
resolve into a cross-refernece by using double backticks instead.
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
Message-Id: <20211004215238.1523082-2-jsnow@redhat.com>
Use a standard heading format for the index.rst file in a directory.
Using overlines makes it clear that individual documents can use e.g.
=== for chapter titles and --- for section titles, as suggested in the
Linux kernel guidelines[1]. They could do it anyway, because documents
included in a toctree are parsed separately and therefore are not tied
to the same conventions for headings. However, keeping some consistency is
useful since sometimes files are included from multiple places.
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/doc-guide/sphinx.html
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
In rST markup, single backticks `like this` represent "interpreted
text", which can be handled as a bunch of different things if tagged
with a specific "role":
https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#interpreted-text
(the most common one for us is "reference to a URL, which gets
hyperlinked").
The default "role" if none is specified is "title_reference",
intended for references to book or article titles, and it renders
into the HTML as <cite>...</cite> (usually comes out as italics).
This commit fixes various places in the manual which were
using single backticks when double backticks (for literal text)
were intended, and covers those files where only one or two
instances of these errors were made.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
