Currently single-stepping SVC executes two instructions. The reason is
that EXCP_DEBUG for the SVC instruction itself is masked by EXCP_SVC.
Fix by re-raising EXCP_DEBUG.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20230510230213.330134-2-iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Hexagon update
# -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
#
# iQEzBAABCgAdFiEENjXHiM5iuR/UxZq0ewJE+xLeRCIFAmRmgQgACgkQewJE+xLe
# RCJLtAf8C/0kQRa4mjnbsztXuFyca53UxAv3BSBEDla4ZcMfFBoVJsGB3OP7IPXd
# KBQpkLyJAVye9idex5xqdp9nIfoGKDTsc6YtCfGujZ17cDpzLRDpHdUTex8PcZYK
# wpfM3hoVJsYRBMsojZ4OaxatjFQ+FWzrIH6FcgH086Q8TH4w9dZLNEJzHC4lOj0s
# 7qOuw2tgm+vOVlzsk/fv6/YD/BTeZTON3jgTPvAnvdRLb/482UpM9JkJ8E4rbte3
# Ss5PUK8QTQHU0yamspGy/PfsYxiptM+jIWGd836fAGzwF12Ug27mSc1enndRtQVW
# pQTdnOnWuuRzOwEpd7x3xh9upACm4g==
# =1CyJ
# -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
# gpg: Signature made Thu 18 May 2023 12:48:24 PM PDT
# gpg: using RSA key 3635C788CE62B91FD4C59AB47B0244FB12DE4422
# gpg: Good signature from "Taylor Simpson (Rock on) <tsimpson@quicinc.com>" [unknown]
# gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
# gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
# Primary key fingerprint: 3635 C788 CE62 B91F D4C5 9AB4 7B02 44FB 12DE 4422
* tag 'pull-hex-20230518-1' of https://github.com/quic/qemu: (44 commits)
Hexagon (linux-user/hexagon): handle breakpoints
Hexagon (gdbstub): add HVX support
Hexagon (gdbstub): fix p3:0 read and write via stub
Hexagon: add core gdbstub xml data for LLDB
gdbstub: add test for untimely stop-reply packets
gdbstub: only send stop-reply packets when allowed to
Remove test_vshuff from hvx_misc tests
Hexagon (decode): look for pkts with multiple insns at the same slot
Hexagon (iclass): update J4_hintjumpr slot constraints
Hexagon: append eflags to unknown cpu model string
Hexagon: list available CPUs with `-cpu help`
Hexagon (target/hexagon/*.py): raise exception on reg parsing error
target/hexagon: fix = vs. == mishap
Hexagon (target/hexagon) Additional instructions handled by idef-parser
Hexagon (target/hexagon) Move items to DisasContext
Hexagon (target/hexagon) Move pkt_has_store_s1 to DisasContext
Hexagon (target/hexagon) Move pred_written to DisasContext
Hexagon (target/hexagon) Move new_pred_value to DisasContext
Hexagon (target/hexagon) Move new_value to DisasContext
Hexagon (target/hexagon) Make special new_value for USR
...
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Add support for the ELF flags
Move target/hexagon/cpu.[ch] to be v73
Change the compiler flag used by "make check-tcg"
The decbin instruction is removed in Hexagon v73, so check the
version before trying to compile the instruction.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Simpson <tsimpson@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anton Johansson <anjo@rev.ng>
Message-Id: <20230427224057.3766963-2-tsimpson@quicinc.com>
linux-user getgroups(), setgroups(), getgroups32() and setgroups32()
used alloca() to allocate grouplist arrays, with unchecked gidsetsize
coming from the "guest". With NGROUPS_MAX being 65536 (linux, and it
is common for an application to allocate NGROUPS_MAX for getgroups()),
this means a typical allocation is half the megabyte on the stack.
Which just overflows stack, which leads to immediate SIGSEGV in actual
system getgroups() implementation.
An example of such issue is aptitude, eg
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811087#72
Cap gidsetsize to NGROUPS_MAX (return EINVAL if it is larger than that),
and use heap allocation for grouplist instead of alloca(). While at it,
fix coding style and make all 4 implementations identical.
Try to not impose random limits - for example, allow gidsetsize to be
negative for getgroups() - just do not allocate negative-sized grouplist
in this case but still do actual getgroups() call. But do not allow
negative gidsetsize for setgroups() since its argument is unsigned.
Capping by NGROUPS_MAX seems a bit arbitrary, - we can do more, it is
not an error if set size will be NGROUPS_MAX+1. But we should not allow
integer overflow for the array being allocated. Maybe it is enough to
just call g_try_new() and return ENOMEM if it fails.
Maybe there's also no need to convert setgroups() since this one is
usually smaller and known beforehand (KERN_NGROUPS_MAX is actually 63, -
this is apparently a kernel-imposed limit for runtime group set).
The patch fixes aptitude segfault mentioned above.
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Message-Id: <20230409105327.1273372-1-mjt@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
The kernel does not require PROT_READ for addresses passed to mincore.
For example the fincore(1) tool from util-linux uses PROT_NONE and
currently does not work under qemu-user.
Example (with fincore(1) from util-linux 2.38):
$ fincore /proc/self/exe
RES PAGES SIZE FILE
24K 6 22.1K /proc/self/exe
$ qemu-x86_64 /usr/bin/fincore /proc/self/exe
fincore: failed to do mincore: /proc/self/exe: Cannot allocate memory
With this patch:
$ ./build/qemu-x86_64 /usr/bin/fincore /proc/self/exe
RES PAGES SIZE FILE
24K 6 22.1K /proc/self/exe
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@t-8ch.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Message-Id: <20230422100314.1650-3-thomas@t-8ch.de>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
This can be used to validate that an address range is mapped but without
being readable or writable.
It will be used by an updated implementation of mincore().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@t-8ch.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Message-Id: <20230422100314.1650-2-thomas@t-8ch.de>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
The correct error number for unknown ioctls is ENOTTY.
ENOSYS would mean that the ioctl() syscall itself is not implemented,
which is very improbable and unexpected for userspace.
ENOTTY means "Inappropriate ioctl for device". This is what the kernel
returns on unknown ioctls, what qemu is trying to express and what
userspace is prepared to handle.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@t-8ch.de>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230426070659.80649-1-thomas@t-8ch.de>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
The bits in cr reg are grouped into eight 4-bit fields represented
by env->crf[8] and the related calculations should be abstracted to
keep the calling routines simpler to read. This is a step towards
cleaning up the related/calling code for better readability.
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230503093619.2530487-2-harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
[danielhb: add 'const' modifier to fix linux-user build]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The '-singlestep' option is confusing, because it doesn't actually
have anything to do with single-stepping the CPU. What it does do
is force TCG emulation to put one guest instruction in each TB,
which can be useful in some situations.
Create a new command line argument -one-insn-per-tb, so we can
document that -singlestep is just a deprecated synonym for it,
and eventually perhaps drop it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20230417164041.684562-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The only place left that looks at the old 'singlestep' global
variable is the TCG curr_cflags() function. Replace the old global
with a new 'one_insn_per_tb' which is defined in tcg-all.c and
declared in accel/tcg/internal.h. This keeps it restricted to the
TCG code, unlike 'singlestep' which was available to every file in
the system and defined in multiple different places for softmmu vs
linux-user vs bsd-user.
While we're making this change, use qatomic_read() and qatomic_set()
on the accesses to the new global, because TCG will read it without
holding a lock.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20230417164041.684562-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
