Commit Graph

319 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Zolotukhin f05cb4374d Remove redundant includes from lib/IR.
llvm-svn: 320622
2017-12-13 21:30:52 +00:00
Vedant Kumar 2b881f567f [DebugInfo] Unify logic to merge DILocations. NFC.
This makes DILocation::getMergedLocation() do what its comment says it
does when merging locations for an Instruction: set the common inlineAt
scope. This simplifies Instruction::applyMergedLocation() a bit.

Testing: check-llvm, check-clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39628

llvm-svn: 317524
2017-11-06 23:15:21 +00:00
whitequark 789164d426 [LLVM-C] Expose functions to create debug locations via DIBuilder.
These include:
  * Several functions for creating an LLVMDIBuilder,
  * LLVMDIBuilderCreateCompileUnit,
  * LLVMDIBuilderCreateFile,
  * LLVMDIBuilderCreateDebugLocation.

Patch by Harlan Haskins.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32368

llvm-svn: 317135
2017-11-01 22:18:52 +00:00
Adrian Prantl a8b2ddbde4 Move the stripping of invalid debug info from the Verifier to AutoUpgrade.
This came out of a recent discussion on llvm-dev
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D38042). Currently the Verifier will strip
the debug info metadata from a module if it finds the dbeug info to be
malformed. This feature is very valuable since it allows us to improve
the Verifier by making it stricter without breaking bcompatibility,
but arguable the Verifier pass should not be modifying the IR. This
patch moves the stripping of broken debug info into AutoUpgrade
(UpgradeDebugInfo to be precise), which is a much better location for
this since the stripping of malformed (i.e., produced by older, buggy
versions of Clang) is a (harsh) form of AutoUpgrade.

This change is mostly NFC in nature, the one big difference is the
behavior when LLVM module passes are introducing malformed debug
info. Prior to this patch, a NoAsserts build would have printed a
warning and stripped the debug info, after this patch the Verifier
will report a fatal error. I believe this behavior is actually more
desirable anyway.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38184

llvm-svn: 314699
2017-10-02 18:31:29 +00:00
Dehao Chen f464627f28 Update getMergedLocation to check the instruction type and merge properly.
Summary: If the merged instruction is call instruction, we need to set the scope to the closes common scope between 2 locations, otherwise it will cause trouble when the call is getting inlined.

Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl

Reviewed By: dblaikie, aprantl

Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37877

llvm-svn: 314694
2017-10-02 18:13:14 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne b52e23669c IR: Represent -ggnu-pubnames with a flag on the DICompileUnit.
This allows the flag to be persisted through to LTO.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37655

llvm-svn: 313078
2017-09-12 21:50:41 +00:00
Justin Bogner b29bebe47b IR: Make stripDebugInfo robust against (invalid) empty basic blocks
Since stripDebugInfo runs before the verifier when reading IR, we can
end up in a situation where we read some invalid IR but don't know its
invalid yet. Before this patch we would crash in stripDebugInfo when
given IR with a completely empty basic block, and after we get a nice
error from the verifier instead.

llvm-svn: 311202
2017-08-18 21:38:03 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 6bda14b313 Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.

I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.

This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.

Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).

llvm-svn: 304787
2017-06-06 11:49:48 +00:00
Eugene Zelenko f53a7b45d8 [IR] Fix some Clang-tidy modernize-use-using warnings; other minor fixes (NFC).
llvm-svn: 302310
2017-05-05 22:30:37 +00:00
Keno Fischer 30779772cf [StripDeadDebug/DIFinder] Track inlined SPs
Summary:
In rL299692 I improved strip-dead-debug-info's ability to drop CUs that are not
referenced from the current module. However, in doing so I neglected to realize
that some SPs could be referenced entirely from inlined functions. It appears
I was not the only one to make this mistake, because DebugInfoFinder, doesn't
find those SPs either. Fix this in DebugInfoFinder and then use that to make
sure not to drop those CUs in strip-dead-debug-info.

Reviewers: aprantl

Reviewed By: aprantl

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31904

llvm-svn: 299936
2017-04-11 13:32:11 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 346dcaf1fa Teach stripNonLineTableDebugInfo() to remap DILocations in !llvm.loop nodes.
llvm-svn: 299107
2017-03-30 20:10:56 +00:00
Teresa Johnson 9b4b8c8d7b Enable stripping of multiple DILocation on !llvm.loop metadata
Summary:
I found that stripDebugInfo was still leaving significant amounts of
debug info due to !llvm.loop that contained DILocation after stripping.
The support for stripping debug info on !llvm.loop added in r293377 only
removes a single DILocation. Enhance that to remove all DILocation from
!llvm.loop.

Reviewers: hfinkel, aprantl, dsanders

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31117

llvm-svn: 298213
2017-03-19 13:54:57 +00:00
Dehao Chen 0944a8c2ec Change debug-info-for-profiling from a TargetOption to a function attribute.
Summary: LTO requires the debug-info-for-profiling to be a function attribute.

Reviewers: echristo, mehdi_amini, dblaikie, probinson, aprantl

Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, dblaikie, aprantl

Subscribers: aprantl, probinson, ahatanak, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29203

llvm-svn: 293833
2017-02-01 22:45:09 +00:00
Daniel Sanders b96a945bf5 stripDebugInfo() should remove DILocation's found in !llvm.loop metadata
Summary:
Patch by Michele Scandale
(with a small tweak to 'CHECK-NOT' the last DILocation in the test)

Subscribers: bogner, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27980

llvm-svn: 293377
2017-01-28 11:22:05 +00:00
Adrian Prantl bceaaa9643 [IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
    not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
    replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
    more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
    DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s).  We also moved away from attaching the
    DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades and a change
to the Bitcode record for DIGlobalVariable, that makes upgrading the
old format unambiguous also for variables without DIExpressions.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 290153
2016-12-20 02:09:43 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 73ec065604 Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."
This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpression. Unfortunately it is not possible to safely upgrade
these variables without adding a flag to the bitcode record indicating which
version they are.
My plan of record is to roll the planned follow-up patch that adds a
unit: field to DIGlobalVariable into this patch before recomitting.
This way we only need one Bitcode upgrade for both changes (with a
version flag in the bitcode record to safely distinguish the record
formats).

Sorry for the churn!

llvm-svn: 289982
2016-12-16 19:39:01 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 74a835cda0 [IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
    not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
    replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
    more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
    DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s).  We also moved away from attaching the
    DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 289920
2016-12-16 04:25:54 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 03c6d31a3b Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."
This reverts commit 289902 while investigating bot berakage.

llvm-svn: 289906
2016-12-16 01:00:30 +00:00
Adrian Prantl ce13935776 [IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
    not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
    replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
    more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
    DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s).  We also moved away from attaching the
    DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 289902
2016-12-16 00:36:43 +00:00
Michael Ilseman e542804343 Add -strip-nonlinetable-debuginfo capability
This adds a new function to DebugInfo.cpp that takes an llvm::Module
as input and removes all debug info metadata that is not directly
needed for line tables, thus effectively stripping all type and
variable information from the module.

The primary motivation for this feature was the bitcode work flow
(cf. http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-June/100643.html
for more background). This is not wired up yet, but will be in
subsequent patches.  For testing, the new functionality is exposed to
opt with a -strip-nonlinetable-debuginfo option.

The secondary use-case (and one that works right now!) is as a
reduction pass in bugpoint. I added two new bugpoint options
(-disable-strip-debuginfo and -disable-strip-debug-types) to control
the new features. By default it will first attempt to remove all debug
information, then only the type info, and then proceed to hack at any
remaining MDNodes.

Thanks to Adrian Prantl for stewarding this patch!

llvm-svn: 285094
2016-10-25 18:44:13 +00:00
Davide Italiano 84bd58e915 [opt] Strip coverage if debug info is not present.
If -coverage is passed, but -g is not, clang populates the PassManager
pipeline with StripSymbols(debugOnly = true).
The stripSymbol pass therefore scans the list of named metadata,
drops !llvm.dbg.cu, but leaves !llvm.gcov and !0 (the compileUnit MD)
around. The verifier runs, and finds out that there's a CU not listed
in !llvm.dbg.cu (as it was previously dropped) -> crash.
When we strip debug info, so, check if there's coverage data,
and strip it as well, in order to avoid pending metadata left around.

Differential Revision:  https://reviews.llvm.org/D25689

llvm-svn: 284418
2016-10-17 20:05:35 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 3bfe1093df Teach llvm::StripDebugInfo() about global variable !dbg attachments.
This is a regression introduced by the global variable ownership
reversal performed in r281284.

rdar://problem/28448075

llvm-svn: 283784
2016-10-10 17:53:33 +00:00
Michael Ilseman 6d6b4d87a3 Revert "Add -strip-nonlinetable-debuginfo capability"
This reverts commit r283473.

Reverted until review is completed.

llvm-svn: 283478
2016-10-06 18:30:26 +00:00
Michael Ilseman d0a4db7632 Add -strip-nonlinetable-debuginfo capability
This adds a new function to DebugInfo.cpp that takes an llvm::Module
as input and removes all debug info metadata that is not directly
needed for line tables, thus effectively stripping all type and
variable information from the module.

The primary motivation for this feature was the bitcode work flow
(cf. http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-June/100643.html
for more background). This is not wired up yet, but will be in
subsequent patches.  For testing, the new functionality is exposed to
opt with a -strip-nonlinetable-debuginfo option.

The secondary use-case (and one that works right now!) is as a
reduction pass in bugpoint. I added two new bugpoint options
(-disable-strip-debuginfo and -disable-strip-debug-types) to control
the new features. By default it will first attempt to remove all debug
information, then only the type info, and then proceed to hack at any
remaining MDNodes.

llvm-svn: 283473
2016-10-06 17:58:38 +00:00
Mehdi Amini db8dd5515d StripDebugInfo: uses isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic> instead of matching against llvm.dbg.* (NFC)
Suggested by Adrian. This is NFC right now but is more clean and
robust against future potential new debug info intrinsics.

From: mehdi_amini <mehdi_amini@91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8>
llvm-svn: 269540
2016-05-14 04:58:35 +00:00