In the motivating case from PR35681 and represented by the macro-fuse-cmp test:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35681
...there's a 37 -> 31 byte size win for the loop because we eliminate the big base
address offsets.
SPEC2017 on Ryzen shows no significant perf difference.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42607
llvm-svn: 324289
candidates with coldcc attribute.
This recommits r322721 reverted due to sanitizer memory leak build bot failures.
Original commit message:
This patch adds support for the coldcc calling convention for Power.
This changes the set of non-volatile registers. It includes a pass to stress
test the implementation by marking all static directly called functions with
the coldcc attribute through the option -enable-coldcc-stress-test. It also
includes an option, -ppc-enable-coldcc, to add the coldcc attribute to
functions which are cold at all call sites based on BlockFrequencyInfo when
the containing function does not call any non cold functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38413
llvm-svn: 323778
candidates with coldcc attribute.
This patch adds support for the coldcc calling convention for Power.
This changes the set of non-volatile registers. It includes a pass to stress
test the implementation by marking all static directly called functions with
the coldcc attribute through the option -enable-coldcc-stress-test. It also
includes an option, -ppc-enable-coldcc, to add the coldcc attribute to
functions which are cold at all call sites based on BlockFrequencyInfo when
the containing function does not call any non cold functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38413
llvm-svn: 322721
If after if-conversion, most of the instructions in this new BB construct a long and slow dependence chain, it may be slower than cmp/branch, even if the branch has a high miss rate, because the control dependence is transformed into data dependence, and control dependence can be speculated, and thus, the second part can execute in parallel with the first part on modern OOO processor.
This patch checks for the long dependence chain, and give up if-conversion if find one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39352
llvm-svn: 321377
- Targets that want to support memcmp expansions now return the list of
supported load sizes.
- Expansion codegen does not assume that all power-of-two load sizes
smaller than the max load size are valid. For examples, this is not the
case for x86(32bit)+sse2.
Fixes PR34887.
llvm-svn: 316905
If particular target supports volatile memory access operations, we can
avoid AS casting to generic AS. Currently it's only enabled in NVPTX for
loads and stores that access global & shared AS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39026
llvm-svn: 316495
Significantly reduces performancei (~30%) of gipfeli
(https://github.com/google/gipfeli)
I have not yet managed to reproduce this regression with the open-source
version of the benchmark on github, but will work with others to get a
reproducer to you later today.
llvm-svn: 315680
Recommitting r314517 with the fix for handling ConstantExpr.
Original commit message:
Currently, getGEPCost() returns TCC_FREE whenever a GEP is a legal addressing
mode in the target. However, since it doesn't check its actual users, it will
return FREE even in cases where the GEP cannot be folded away as a part of
actual addressing mode. For example, if an user of the GEP is a call
instruction taking the GEP as a parameter, then the GEP may not be folded in
isel.
llvm-svn: 314923
Summary:
Currently, getGEPCost() returns TCC_FREE whenever a GEP is a legal addressing mode in the target.
However, since it doesn't check its actual users, it will return FREE even in cases
where the GEP cannot be folded away as a part of actual addressing mode.
For example, if an user of the GEP is a call instruction taking the GEP as a parameter,
then the GEP may not be folded in isel.
Reviewers: hfinkel, efriedma, mcrosier, jingyue, haicheng
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38085
llvm-svn: 314517
Summary:
Right now there are two functions with the same name, one does the work
and the other one returns true if expansion is needed. Rename
TargetTransformInfo::expandMemCmp to make it more consistent with other
members of TargetTransformInfo.
Remove the unused Instruction* parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38165
llvm-svn: 314096
This is intended to be a superset of the functionality from D31037 (EarlyCSE) but implemented
as an independent pass, so there's no stretching of scope and feature creep for an existing pass.
I also proposed a weaker version of this for SimplifyCFG in D30910. And I initially had almost
this same functionality as an addition to CGP in the motivating example of PR31028:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31028
The advantage of positioning this ahead of SimplifyCFG in the pass pipeline is that it can allow
more flattening. But it needs to be after passes (InstCombine) that could sink a div/rem and
undo the hoisting that is done here.
Decomposing remainder may allow removing some code from the backend (PPC and possibly others).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37121
llvm-svn: 312862
Current TargetTransformInfo can support throughput cost model and code size model, but sometimes we also need instruction latency cost model in different optimizations. Hal suggested we need a single public interface to query the different cost of an instruction. So I proposed following interface:
enum TargetCostKind {
TCK_RecipThroughput, ///< Reciprocal throughput.
TCK_Latency, ///< The latency of instruction.
TCK_CodeSize ///< Instruction code size.
};
int getInstructionCost(const Instruction *I, enum TargetCostKind kind) const;
All clients should mainly use this function to query the cost of an instruction, parameter <kind> specifies the desired cost model.
This patch also provides a simple default implementation of getInstructionLatency.
The default getInstructionLatency provides latency numbers for only small number of instruction classes, those latency numbers are only reasonable for modern OOO processors. It can be extended in following ways:
Add more detail into this function.
Add getXXXLatency function and call it from here.
Implement target specific getInstructionLatency function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37170
llvm-svn: 312832
SLP vectorizer supports horizontal reductions for Add/FAdd binary
operations. Patch adds support for horizontal min/max reductions.
Function getReductionCost() is split to getArithmeticReductionCost() for
binary operation reductions and getMinMaxReductionCost() for min/max
reductions.
Patch fixes PR26956.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27846
llvm-svn: 312791
Summary:
We add the precise cache sizes and associativity for the following Intel
architectures:
- Penry
- Nehalem
- Westmere
- Sandy Bridge
- Ivy Bridge
- Haswell
- Broadwell
- Skylake
- Kabylake
Polly uses since several months a performance model for BLAS computations that
derives optimal cache and register tile sizes from cache and latency
information (based on ideas from "Analytical Modeling Is Enough for High-Performance BLIS", by Tze Meng Low published at TOMS 2016).
While bootstrapping this model, these target values have been kept in Polly.
However, as our implementation is now rather mature, it seems time to teach
LLVM itself about cache sizes.
Interestingly, L1 and L2 cache sizes are pretty constant across
micro-architectures, hence a set of architecture specific default values
seems like a good start. They can be expanded to more target specific values,
in case certain newer architectures require different values. For now a set
of Intel architectures are provided.
Just as a little teaser, for a simple gemm kernel this model allows us to
improve performance from 1.2s to 0.27s. For gemm kernels with less optimal
memory layouts even larger speedups can be reported.
Reviewers: Meinersbur, bollu, singam-sanjay, hfinkel, gareevroman, fhahn, sebpop, efriedma, asb
Reviewed By: fhahn, asb
Subscribers: lsaba, asb, pollydev, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37051
llvm-svn: 311647
isLegalAddressingMode() has recently gained the extra optional Instruction*
parameter, and therefore it can now do the job that previously only
isFoldableMemAccess() could do.
The SystemZ implementation of isLegalAddressingMode() has gained the
functionality of checking for offsets, which used to be done with
isFoldableMemAccess().
The isFoldableMemAccess() hook has been removed everywhere.
Review: Quentin Colombet, Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35933
llvm-svn: 310463
This patch makes LSR generate better code for SystemZ in the cases of memory
intrinsics, Load->Store pairs or comparison of immediate with memory.
In order to achieve this, the following common code changes were made:
* New TTI hook: LSRWithInstrQueries(), which defaults to false. Controls if
LSR should do instruction-based addressing evaluations by calling
isLegalAddressingMode() with the Instruction pointers.
* In LoopStrengthReduce: handle address operands of memset, memmove and memcpy
as address uses, and call isFoldableMemAccessOffset() for any LSRUse::Address,
not just loads or stores.
SystemZ changes:
* isLSRCostLess() implemented with Insns first, and without ImmCost.
* New function supportedAddressingMode() that is a helper for TTI methods
looking at Instructions passed via pointers.
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Quentin Colombet
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35262https://reviews.llvm.org/D35049
llvm-svn: 308729
Now, getUserCost() only checks the src and dst types of EXT to decide it is free
or not. This change first checks the types, then calls isExtFreeImpl(), and
check if EXT can form ExtLoad at last. Currently, only AArch64 has customized
implementation of isExtFreeImpl() to check if EXT can be folded into its use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34458
llvm-svn: 308076
Adds loop expansions for known-size and unknown-sized memcpy calls, allowing the
target to provide the operand types through TTI callbacks. The default values
for the TTI callbacks use int8 operand types and matches the existing behaviour
if they aren't overridden by the target.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32536
llvm-svn: 307346
Sanjay Patel
Zaara Syeda
Guozhi Wei
Sean Fertile
Clement Courbet
Artem Belevich
Daniel Jasper
Jun Bum Lim
Alex Shlyapnikov
Alexey Bataev
Tobias Grosser
Jonas Paulsson
Mohammed Agabaria
Haicheng Wu