Summary:
These are general purpose "utility" classes, whose functionality is not
debugger-specific in any way. As such, I believe they belong in the
Utility module.
This doesn't break any particular dependency (yet), but it reduces the
number of Core dependencies across the board.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, teemperor, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55361
llvm-svn: 349157
When debugging read-only memory we cannot use software breakpoint. We
already have support for hardware breakpoints and users can specify them
with `-H`. However, there's no option to force LLDB to use hardware
breakpoints internally, for example while stepping.
This patch adds a setting target.require-hardware-breakpoint that forces
LLDB to always use hardware breakpoints. Because hardware breakpoints
are a limited resource and can fail to resolve, this patch also extends
error handling in thread plans, where breakpoints are used for stepping.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54221
llvm-svn: 346920
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
This patch removes the logic for resolving paths out of FileSpec and
updates call sites to rely on the FileSystem class instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53915
llvm-svn: 345890
This patch removes the Exists method from FileSpec and updates its uses
with calls to the FileSystem.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53845
llvm-svn: 345854
This is an NFC commit to refactor the "load dependent files" parameter
from a boolean to an enum value. We want to be able to specify a
default, in which case we decide whether or not to load the dependent
files based on whether the target is an executable or not (i.e. a
dylib).
This is a dependency for D51934.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51859
llvm-svn: 342633
Summary:
D48465 is currently blocked by the fact that tab-completing the first expression is deadlocking LLDB.
The reason for this deadlock is that when we push the ProcessIO handler for reading the Objective-C runtime
information from the executable (which is triggered when we parse the an expression for the first time),
the IOHandler can't be pushed as the Editline::Cancel method is deadlocking.
The deadlock in Editline is coming from the m_output_mutex, which is locked before we go into tab completion.
Even without this lock, calling Cancel on Editline will mean that Editline cleans up behind itself and deletes the
current user-input, which is screws up the console when we are tab-completing at the same time.
I think for now the most reasonable way of fixing this is to just not call Cancel on the current IOHandler when we push
the IOHandler for running an internal utility function.
As we can't really write unit tests for IOHandler itself (due to the hard dependency on an initialized Debugger including
all its global state) and Editline completion is currently also not really testable in an automatic fashion, the test for this has
to be that the expression command completion in D48465 doesn't fail when requesting completion the first time.
A more precise test plan for this is:
1. Apply D48465.
2. Start lldb and break in some function.
3. Type `expr foo` and press tab to request completion.
4. Without this patch, we deadlock and LLDB stops responding.
I'll provide an actual unit test for this once I got around and made the IOHandler code testable,
but for now unblocking D48465 is more critical.
Thanks to Jim for helping me debugging this.
Reviewers: jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: emaste, clayborg, abidh, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50912
llvm-svn: 340988
This change improves the logging for the lldb.module category to note a few interesting cases:
1. Local object file found, but specs not matching
2. Local object file not found, using a placeholder module
The handling and logging for the cases wehre we fail to load compressed dwarf
symbols is also improved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50274
llvm-svn: 339161
These three classes have no external dependencies, but they are used
from various low-level APIs. Moving them down to Utility improves
overall code layering (although it still does not break any particular
dependency completely).
The XCode project will need to be updated after this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49740
llvm-svn: 339127
Summary:
Occasionally, when launching a process in lldb (especially on windows, but not limited to), lldb will hang before the process is launched and it will never recover. This happens because the timing of the processing of the state changes can be slightly different. The state changes that are issued are:
1) SetPublicState(eStateLaunching)
2) SetPrivateState(eStateLaunching)
3) SetPublicState(eStateStopped)
4) SetPrivateState(eStateStopped)
What we expect to see is:
public state: launching -> launching -> stopped
private state: launching -> stopped
What we see is:
public state: launching -> stopped -> launching
private state: launching -> stopped
The second launching change to the public state is issued when WaitForProcessStopPrivate calls HandlePrivateEvent on the event which was created when the private state was set to launching. HandlePrivateEvent has logic to determine whether to broadcase the event and a launching event is *always* broadcast. At the same time, when the stopped event is processed by WaitForProcessStopPrivate next, the function exists and that event is never broadcast, so the public state remains as launching.
HandlePrivateEvent does two things: determine whether there's a next action as well as determine whether to broadcast the event that was processed. There's only ever a next action set if we are trying to attach to a process, but WaitForProcessStopPrivate is only ever called when we are launching a process or connecting remotely, so the first part of HandlePrivateEvent (handling the next action) is irrelevant for WaitForProcessStopPrivate. As far as broadcasting the event is concerned, since we are handling state changes that already occurred to the public state (and are now duplicated in the private state), I believe the broadcast step is unnecessary also (and in fact, it causes the hang).
This change removes the call to HandlePrivateEvent from inside WaitForProcessStopPrivate.
Incidentally, there was also a bug filed recently that is the same issue: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37496
Reviewers: asmith, labath, zturner, jingham
Reviewed By: zturner, jingham
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47609
llvm-svn: 333781
This teaches lldb-test how to launch a process, set up an IRMemoryMap,
and issue memory allocations in the target process through the map. This
makes it possible to test IRMemoryMap in a targeted way.
This has uncovered two bugs so far. The first bug is that Malloc
performs an adjustment on the pointer returned from AllocateMemory (for
alignment purposes) which ultimately allows overlapping memory regions
to be created. The second bug is that after most of the address space on
the host side is exhausted, Malloc may return the same address multiple
times. These bugs (and hopefully more!) can be uncovered and tested for
with targeted lldb-test commands.
At an even higher level, the motivation for addressing these bugs is
that they can lead to strange user-visible failures (e.g, variables
assume the wrong value during expression evaluation, or the debugger
crashes). See my third comment on this swift-lldb PR for an example:
https://github.com/apple/swift-lldb/pull/652
I hope lldb-test is the right place to add this testing harness. Setting
up a gtest-style unit test proved too cumbersome (you need to recreate
or mock way too much debugger state), as did writing end-to-end tests
(it's hard to write a test that actually hits a buggy path).
With lldb-test, it's easy to read/generate the test input and parse the
test output. I'll attach a simple "fuzz" tester which generates failing
test cases to the Phab review. Here's an example:
```
Command: malloc(size=1024, alignment=32)
Malloc: address = 0xca000
Command: malloc(size=64, alignment=16)
Malloc: address = 0xca400
Command: malloc(size=1024, alignment=16)
Malloc: address = 0xca440
Command: malloc(size=16, alignment=8)
Malloc: address = 0xca840
Command: malloc(size=2048, alignment=16)
Malloc: address = 0xcb000
Command: malloc(size=64, alignment=32)
Malloc: address = 0xca860
Command: malloc(size=1024, alignment=16)
Malloc: address = 0xca890
Malloc error: overlapping allocation detected, previous allocation at [0xca860, 0xca8a0)
```
{F6288839}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47508
llvm-svn: 333583
Summary:
Multiple threads could be calling into DoLoadImage concurrently,
only one should be allowed to create the UtilityFunction.
Reviewers: jingham
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46733
llvm-svn: 332115
Summary:
The comments on this class were out of date with the implementation, and
the implementation itself was inconsistent with our usage of the Timeout
class (I started converting everything to use this class back in D27136,
but I missed this one). I avoid duplicating the waiting logic by
introducing a templated WaitFor function, and make other functions
delegate to that. This function can be also used as a replacement for
the unused WaitForBitToBeSet functions I removed, if it turns out to be
necessary.
As this changes the meaning of a "zero" timeout, I tracked down all the
callers of these functions and updated them accordingly. Propagating the
changes to all the callers of RunShellCommand was a bit too much for
this patch, so I stopped there and will continue that in a follow-up
patch.
I also add some basic unittests for the functions I modified.
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46580
llvm-svn: 331880
The function can only return in one of two ways: the Predicate value is
successfully set within the allotted time, or it isn't (the wait times
out). These states can be represented in the return value, and the extra
arg adds no value.
llvm-svn: 331458
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
That way we won't have to compile a new expression every time we want
dlopen a library.
<rdar://problem/32626584>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45703
llvm-svn: 330214
Summary:
The idea behind this is to move the functionality which depend on other lldb
classes into a separate class. This way, the Args class can be turned
into a lightweight arc+argv wrapper and moved into the lower lldb
layers.
Reviewers: jingham, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44306
llvm-svn: 329677
The difference between this and the previous patch is that now we use
ELF physical addresses only for loading objects into the target (and the
rest of the module load address logic still uses virtual addresses).
Summary:
When writing an object file over gdb-remote, use the vFlashErase, vFlashWrite, and vFlashDone commands if the write address is in a flash memory region. A bare metal target may have this kind of setup.
- Update ObjectFileELF to set load addresses using physical addresses. A typical case may be a data section with a physical address in ROM and a virtual address in RAM, which should be loaded to the ROM address.
- Add support for querying the target's qXfer:memory-map, which contains information about flash memory regions, leveraging MemoryRegionInfo data structures with minor modifications
- Update ProcessGDBRemote to use vFlash commands in DoWriteMemory when the target address is in a flash region
Original discussion at http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2018-January/013093.html
Reviewers: clayborg, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: llvm-commits, arichardson, emaste, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42145
Patch by Owen Shaw <llvm@owenpshaw.net>.
llvm-svn: 327970
The OS plugins might have updated the thread list after a core file has
been loaded. The physical thread in the core file may no longer be the
one that should be selected. Hence we should run the thread selection
logic after loading the core.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44139
llvm-svn: 327501
Jason Molenda
Pavel Labath
Jonas Devlieghere
Tatyana Krasnukha
Raphael Isemann
Leonard Mosescu
Jim Ingham
Adrian Prantl
Stella Stamenova
Vedant Kumar
Frederic Riss
Pavel Labath