On Hexagon, breakpoints need to be on the first instruction of a packet.
When the LLVM disassembler for Hexagon returned 32 bit instructions, we
needed code to find the start of the current packet. Now that the LLVM
disassembler for Hexagon returns packets instead of instructions, we always
have the first instruction of the packet. Remove the packet traversal code
because it can cause problems when the next packet has more than one
instruction.
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84966
When a process is notified that modules got loaded, currently only
existing language runtimes are given a chance to deal with that. This
means that if the runtime for a given language wasn't needed before it
won't be informed of the module chance.
This is wrong because the module change might be what triggers the need
for a certain runtime. Instead, we should give the language runtime for
every supported language a chance to deal with the modified modules.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84475
Encountered the following situation: Let we started thread T1 and it hit
breakpoint on B1 location. We suspended T1 and continued the process.
Then we started thread T2 which hit for example the same location B1.
This time in a breakpoint callback we decided not to stop returning
false.
Expected result: process continues (as if T2 did not hit breakpoint) its
workflow with T1 still suspended. Actual result: process do stops (as if
T2 callback returned true).
Solution: We need invalidate StopInfo for threads that was previously
suspended just because something that is already inactive can not be the
reason of stop. Thread::GetPrivateStopInfo() may be appropriate place to
do it, because it gets called (through Thread::GetStopInfo()) every time
before process reports stop and user gets chance to change
m_resume_state again i.e if we see m_resume_state == eStateSuspended
it definitely means it was set during previous stop and it also means
this thread can not be stopped again (cos' it was frozen during
previous stop).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80112
This patchs adds an optional warning that is printed when stopped at a
frame that was compiled in a source language that LLDB has no plugin
for.
The motivational use-case is debugging Swift code on Linux. When the
user accidentally invokes the system LLDB that was built without the
Swift plugin, it is very much non-obvious why debugging doesnt
work. This warning makes it easy to figure out what went wrong.
<rdar://problem/56986569>
Calling Disconnect while the read thread is running is racy because the
thread can also call Disconnect. This is a follow-up to b424b0bf, which
reorders other occurences of Disconnect/StopReadThread I can find, and also
adds an assertion to guard against new occurences being introduced.
Avoid a race between the Disconnect call in `Communication::ReadThread`
and the one in `Process::ShouldBroadcastEvent` by reordering the calls
to Disconnect and StopReadThread in `Process::ShouldBroadcastEvent`.
In D77295 Pavel suggested that that might explain the broken pipe I was
seeing. Indeed, changing the order resolved the issue.
We would return `LLDB_INVALID_IMAGE_TOKEN` for the address rather than
the correct value of `LLDB_IMAGE_ADDRESS`. This would result in the
check for the return value to silently pass on x64 as the invalid
address and invalid token are of different sizes (`size_t` vs
`uintprr_t`). This corrects the return value to `LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS`
and addresses the rest to reset the mapped address to the invalid value.
This was found by inspection when trying to implement module support for
Windows.
that were not reported by the OS plugin. To facilitate this, move
adding/updating the ThreadPlans for a Thread to the ThreadPlanStackMap.
Also move dumping thread plans there as well.
Added some tests for "thread plan list" and "thread plan discard" since
I didn't seem to have written any originally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76814
Some functions in this file only use the "target" component of an
execution context. Adjust the argument lists to reflect that.
This avoids some defensive null checks and simplifies most of the
callers.
When a thread stops, this checks depending on the platform if the top frame is
an abort stack frame. If so, it looks for an assert stack frame in the upper
frames and set it as the most relavant frame when found.
To do so, the StackFrameRecognizer class holds a "Most Relevant Frame" and a
"cooked" stop reason description. When the thread is about to stop, it checks
if the current frame is recognized, and if so, it fetches the recognized frame's
attributes and applies them.
rdar://58528686
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73303
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
When a thread stops, this checks depending on the platform if the top frame is
an abort stack frame. If so, it looks for an assert stack frame in the upper
frames and set it as the most relavant frame when found.
To do so, the StackFrameRecognizer class holds a "Most Relevant Frame" and a
"cooked" stop reason description. When the thread is about to stop, it checks
if the current frame is recognized, and if so, it fetches the recognized frame's
attributes and applies them.
rdar://58528686
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73303
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
I previously removed the code in ValueObject::GetExpressionPath that
took advantage of the parameter `qualify_cxx_base_classes`. As a result,
this is now unused and can be removed.
When a thread stops, this checks depending on the platform if the top frame is
an abort stack frame. If so, it looks for an assert stack frame in the upper
frames and set it as the most relavant frame when found.
To do so, the StackFrameRecognizer class holds a "Most Relevant Frame" and a
"cooked" stop reason description. When the thread is about to stop, it checks
if the current frame is recognized, and if so, it fetches the recognized frame's
attributes and applies them.
rdar://58528686
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73303
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>