Commit Graph

59975 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Lennart Poettering
df4bed3f92 Merge pull request #24753 from DaanDeMeyer/repart-squashfs
repart: Add squashfs support
2022-09-21 19:49:10 +02:00
Edson Juliano Drosdeck
e65b02f831 Fix inverted rotation in the Positivo DUO #24769 (#24770)
hwdb: Fix  inverted rotation in the Positivo DUO 

Fixes: #24769
2022-09-21 19:46:42 +02:00
Lennart Poettering
64650de778 stub: fix conditionalization of initrd assembly
We forgot to conditionalize this on pcrsig/pcrpkey too. So if you have
ne creds or sysext configured we actually wouldn't pass pcrsig/pcrpkey
along. Let's fix that.
2022-09-21 19:43:48 +02:00
Daan De Meyer
95bfd3cd50 repart: Add squashfs support
To make this work, we have to set up everything in a temporary
directory tree that we can pass to mksquashfs as a single directory.

To make the most common scenario more efficient, we skip the temporary
setup directory if we only get a single source tree destined to root
in the squashfs filesystem.
2022-09-21 14:16:13 +02:00
Daan De Meyer
92f95ae707 Merge pull request #24751 from medhefgo/stub-x86
stub: Several fixes
2022-09-21 11:12:59 +02:00
Daan De Meyer
7f55ad775d shared: Add squashfs support to make_filesystem()
The caveat is that the caller has to provide a source directory
to initialize the squashfs filesystem from.
2022-09-21 10:50:16 +02:00
Daan De Meyer
0178ee6779 Merge pull request #24522 from yuwata/core-device-drop-nonexistent-devlink-unit
core/device: drop nonexistent devlink units
2022-09-21 10:30:51 +02:00
наб
2084cbdc2f kernel-install.8: fix -h/-v ordering in SYNOPSIS 2022-09-21 16:40:46 +09:00
наб
3a79a037da kernel-install/90-loaderentry: fix chown 2022-09-21 16:40:17 +09:00
Yu Watanabe
fb227a3de1 test-17-udev: test that device units for nonexistent devlink are removed
For issue #24518.
2022-09-21 05:58:40 +09:00
Yu Watanabe
ede0fe0271 test-64-storage: add test for renaming lvm volume 2022-09-21 05:58:40 +09:00
Yu Watanabe
9c126b2c92 test-64-udev-storage: check device units 2022-09-21 05:58:40 +09:00
Yu Watanabe
a4cb8afb8f core/device: check that no unit is ready and not simultaneously
This should not happen, just for safety.
2022-09-21 05:58:40 +09:00
Yu Watanabe
c352110adc core/device: refuse alias with ".." 2022-09-21 05:58:40 +09:00
Yu Watanabe
4228306b9d core/device: always update existing devlink or alias units on uevent
Previously, existing device units for devlinks or aliases were not
removed unless the main device unit is removed. This makes all existing
device units for devlinks and aliases are checked if they are still
required, and remove if not necessary anymore.

Fixes #24518.
2022-09-21 05:58:37 +09:00
Frantisek Sumsal
761b1d8314 test: don't overwrite existing $QEMU_OPTIONS 2022-09-20 22:40:02 +02:00
Daan De Meyer
06d6ea1b16 mkosi: Set ExtraSearchPaths=build/ by default
When hacking on systemd, let's have mkosi prefer executables from
the build directory over the system ones.
2022-09-20 21:59:00 +02:00
Lennart Poettering
0026791f2e Merge pull request #24521 from poettering/boot-loader-spec-dollar-boot-fix
boot loader spec fixes
2022-09-20 21:51:22 +02:00
Lennart Poettering
0b81e47e80 boot-loader-spec: undo redefinition of $BOOT
In 53c26db4da the meaning of $BOOT was
redefined. I think that's quite problematic, since the concept is
implemented in code and interface of bootctl. Thus, I think we should
stick to the original definition, which is: "where to *place* boot menu
entries" (as opposed to "where to *read* boot menu entries from").

The aforementioned change was done to address two things afaiu:

1. it focussed on a $BOOT as the single place to put boot entries in,
   instead of mentioning that both ESP and $BOOT are expected to be
   the source

2. it mentioned the /loader/ dir (as location for boot loader resources)
   itself as part of the spec, which however only really makes sense in
   the ESP. /loader/entries/ otoh makes sense in either the ESP or
   $BOOT.

With this rework I try to address these two issues differently:

1. I intend to make clear the $BOOT is the "primary" place to put stuff
   in, and is what should be mounted to /boot/.

2. The ESP (if different from $BOOT) is listed as "secondary" source to
   read from, and is what should be mounted to /efi/. NB we now make the
   distinction between "where to put" (which is single partition) and
   "where to read from".

3. This drops any reference of the /loader/ dir witout the /entries/
   suffix. Only the full /loader/entries/ dir (and its companion file
   /loader/entries.srel) are now mentioned. Thus isolated /loader/
   directory hence becomes irrelevant in the spec, and the fact that
   sd-boot maintains some files there (and only in the ESP) is kept out
   of the spec, because it is irrelevant to other boot loaders.

4. It puts back the suggestion to mount $BOOT to /boot/ and the ESP to
   /efi/ (and suggests adding a symlink or bind mount if both are the
   same partition). Why? Because the dirs are semantically unrelated:
   it's OK and common to have and ESP but no $BOOT, hence putting ESP
   inside of a useless, non-existing "ghost" dir /boot/ makes little
   sense. More importantly though, because these partitions are
   typically backed by VFAT we want to maintain them as an autofs, with
   a short idle delay, so that the file systems are unmounted (and thus
   fully clean) at almost all times. This doesn't work if they are
   nested within each other, as the establishment of the inner autofs
   would pin the outer one, making the excercise useless. Now I don't
   think the spec should mention autofs (since that is an implementation
   detail), but it should arrange things so that this specific, very
   efficient, safe and robust implementation can be implemented.

The net result should be easy from an OS perspective:

1. *Put* boot loader entries in /boot/, always.

2. *Read* boot loader entries from both /boot/ and /efi/ -- if these are distinct.

3. The only things we define in the spec are /loader/entries/*.conf and
   /EFI/Linux/*.efi in these two partitions (well, and the companion
   file /loader/entries.srel

4. /efi/ and /boot/ because not nested can be autofs.

5. bootctl code and interface (in particular --esp-path= and
   --boot-path=) match the spec again. `bootctl -x` and `bootctl -p`
   will now print the path to $BOOT and ESP again, matching the concepts
   in the spec again.

From the sd-boot perspective things are equally easy:

1. Read boot enrties from ESP and XBOOTLDR.

2. Maintain boot loader config/other resources in ESP only.

And that's it.

Fixes: #24247
2022-09-20 21:49:58 +02:00
Lennart Poettering
e04ef18e48 boot-loader-spec: fix typo 2022-09-20 21:35:58 +02:00
Lennart Poettering
cae6a289db boot-loader-spec: add comment about case sensitivity of file names 2022-09-20 21:35:58 +02:00
Luca Boccassi
3d4cbc3f8e TODO: drop support for unmerged-usr in H2 2023 2022-09-20 20:08:18 +01:00
Yu Watanabe
9616f550b8 core/device: introduce device_propagate_reload() 2022-09-21 03:12:12 +09:00
Yu Watanabe
c072b84c7e core/device: introduce device_by_path() helper function 2022-09-21 03:12:12 +09:00
Yu Watanabe
1cb89339bc core/device: removed devices are not ready 2022-09-21 03:12:12 +09:00