The newly introduced Energy Model framework manages power cost tables in
a generic way. Moreover, it supports several types of models since the
tables can come from DT or firmware (through SCMI) for example. On the
other hand, the cpu_cooling subsystem manages its own power cost tables
using only DT data.
In order to avoid the duplication of data in the kernel, and in order to
enable IPA with EMs coming from more than just DT, remove the private
tables from cpu_cooling.c and migrate it to using the centralized EM
framework. Doing so should have no visible functional impact for
existing users of IPA since:
- recent extenstions to the the PM_OPP infrastructure enable the
registration of EMs in PM_EM using the DT property used by IPA;
- the existing upstream cpufreq drivers marked with the
'CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV' flag all use the aforementioned PM_OPP
infrastructure, which means they all support PM_EM. The only two
exceptions are qoriq-cpufreq which doesn't in fact use an EM and
scmi-cpufreq which doesn't use DT for power costs.
For existing users of cpu_cooling, PM_EM tables will contain the exact
same power values that IPA used to compute on its own until now. The
only new dependency for them is to compile in CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL.
The case where the thermal subsystem is used without an Energy Model
(cpufreq_cooling_ops) is handled by looking directly at CPUFreq's
frequency table which is already a dependency for cpu_cooling.c anyway.
Since the thermal framework expects the cooling states in a particular
order, bail out whenever the CPUFreq table is unsorted, since that is
fairly uncommon in general, and there are currently no users of
cpu_cooling for this use-case.
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191030151451.7961-5-qperret@google.com
The structs representing capacity states and performance domains of an
Energy Model are currently only defined for CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL=y. That
makes it hard for code outside PM_EM to manipulate those structures
without a lot of ifdefery or stubbed accessors.
So, move the declaration of the two structs outside of the
CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL ifdef. The client code (e.g. EAS or thermal) always
checks the return of em_cpu_get() before using it, so the exising code
is still safe to use as-is.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191030151451.7961-3-qperret@google.com
The recently introduced Energy Model (EM) framework manages power cost
tables for the CPUs of the system. Its only user right now is the
scheduler, in the context of Energy Aware Scheduling (EAS).
However, the EM framework also offers a generic infrastructure that
could replace subsystem-specific implementations of the same concepts,
as this is the case in the thermal framework.
So, in order to prepare the migration of the thermal subsystem to use
the EM framework, enable it in the default arm64 defconfig, which is the
most commonly used architecture for IPA. This will also compile-in all
of the EAS code, although it won't be enabled by default -- EAS requires
to use the 'schedutil' CPUFreq governor while arm64 defaults to
'performance'.
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191030151451.7961-2-qperret@google.com
Currently a multiply operation is being performed on two int values
and the result is being assigned to a u64, presumably because the
end result is expected to be probably larger than an int. However,
because the multiply is an int multiply one can get overflow. Avoid
the overflow by casting degc to a u64 to force a u64 multiply.
Also use div_u64 for the divide as suggested by Daniel Lezcano.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Fixes: fbfe1a042cfd ("drivers: thermal: tsens: Add interrupt support")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191101100035.25502-1-colin.king@canonical.com
Amlogic G12A and G12B SoCs integrate two thermal sensors
with the same design. One is located close to the DDR controller
and the other one is located close to the PLLs (between the CPU and GPU).
The calibration data for each of the thermal sensors instance is stored
in a different location within the AO region.
Implement reading the temperature from each thermal sensor.
The IP block has more functionality, which may be added to this driver
in the future:
- chip reset when the temperature exceeds a configurable threshold
- up to four interrupts when the temperature has risen above a
configurable threshold
- up to four interrupts when the temperature has fallen below a
configurable threshold
Tested-by: Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume La Roque <glaroque@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191004090114.30694-3-glaroque@baylibre.com
Depending on the IP version, TSENS supports upper, lower and critical
threshold interrupts. We only add support for upper and lower threshold
interrupts for now.
TSENSv2 has an irq [status|clear|mask] bit tuple for each sensor while
earlier versions only have a single bit per sensor to denote status and
clear. These differences are handled transparently by the interrupt
handler. At each interrupt, we reprogram the new upper and lower threshold
in the .set_trip callback.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7508ba143f144407e5dd546107ddae65c380a76f.1572526427.git.amit.kucheria@linaro.org
