The doc.coreboot.org container is several years out of date, using the
three year old Alpine 3.8 as the base image along with Sphinx related
pip packages which are even older. Accordingly, update the documentation
related pip packages in the coreboot-jenkins-node container as well.
- Update doc.coreboot.org to Alpine 3.18.3
- Update documentation related pip packages on coreboot-jenkins-node
and doc.coreboot.org to the latest versions on PyPI
- Update Sphinx to 6.2.1 as the latest version of sphinx_rtd_theme does
not yet support sphinx >= 7
The updates also noticeably improve performance, dropping documentation
build times from ~75 s down to ~42 s on my system from the Alpine+Python
updates alone, and further down to ~35 s with the rest of the updates.
TEST: The documentation builds and renders properly when built using the
updated container.
Change-Id: I38dfd22ee71c3779ab5fd3b3060e4675e9e3fe54
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/73159
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin L Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
If IASL isn't installed, the genbuild script throws a confusing warning.
This can and should be ignored because toolchain.inc will find this and
provide a much better error message.
The trailing >/dev/null was probably intended to do this, but didn't
actually affect anything.
Adding quotes around the IASL command will make "" be the command that
tries to get run instead of `-v` when IASL isn't present. This will
always be a failure, whereas `-v` could theoretically be a valid
command.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Ibff93db670766c4de21faa7553f2003450465407
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/76857
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
PchPcieClockGating and PchPciePowerGating UPDs are not yet available
in RPL-S IOT FSP. It also looks like those UPDs are not generally
available in all public RaptorLake FSP headers yet, so guard it
against SOC_INTEL_RAPTORLAKE to avoid build errors.
Change-Id: Iedac21bafa3428957e054fc8fefa38f9f776772d
Signed-off-by: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/77337
Reviewed-by: Jan Samek <jan.samek@siemens.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan@9elements.com>
This adds a Kconfig option to select memtest86+ version 6 as a secondary
payload and sets that as the default. The coreboot version 5 code may
still be selected and used if desired.
Compiling for 32 bit requires glibc from multilib installed, if the host
system is running on 64 bit, as header files, e.g. gnu/stubs-32.h, are
required from there. So introduce a new choice menu which allows to
choose between 32 and 64 bit.
By default, the stable 6.20 version is selected instead of the top of
the main branch.
TEST=Build both V5 and V6, boot them in QEMU
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Change-Id: Ie0eedc25fcf37b925b072ca809c019a599a20392
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/69277
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
This binutils patch was pushed by the original author using the word
"loosing", which means "to release" instead of "losing", meaning to drop
or misplace.
I did not change the spelling of the commit message inside the patch so
that the patch can still be tracked easily, but wanted to fix the
mistaken spelling which appears when the patch is applied when building
the crossgcc toolchain.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I66fd596a79c9eb331f473d175180cf7bb5a38529
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/77327
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
We've had issues in the past where building with a sufficient number of
processors would expose a previously hidden timing issue in the build.
Those have frequently been in the path of a single chip or architecture,
so this adds a few different builds.
I'd like to have a representative sampling without increasing the build
time too much so maybe in the future, we can modify the clang build
targets to be different than the GCC targets.
These can be updated to different targets over time.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I51e39bc1ce6b9b7c257d0170ce3d2b5ab99d35df
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/77329
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>