The cifs.ko SecurityFlags interface wins my award for worst-designed
interface ever, but we're sort of stuck with it since it's documented
and people do use it (even if it doesn't work correctly).
Case in point -- you can specify multiple sets of "MUST" flags. It makes
absolutely no sense, but you can do it.
What should the effect be in such a case? No one knows or seems to have
considered this so far, so let's define it now. If you try to specify
multiple MUST flags, clear any other MAY or MUST bits except for the
ones that involve signing.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
According to MS-SMB2 section 2.2.4: if no blob, client picks default which
for us will be
ses->sectype = RawNTLMSSP;
but for time being this is also our only auth choice so doesn't matter
as long as we include this fix (which does not treat the empty
SecurityBuffer as an error as the code had been doing).
We just found a server which sets blob length to zero expecting raw so
this fixes negotiation with that server.
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
This is RH bug 970891
Uppercasing of username during calculation of ntlmv2 hash fails
because UniStrupr function does not handle big endian wchars.
Also fix a comment in the same code to reflect its correct usage.
[To make it easier for stable (rather than require 2nd patch) fixed
this patch of Shirish's to remove endian warning generated
by sparse -- steve f.]
Reported-by: steve <sanpatr1@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
We've had a long-standing problem with DFS referral points. CIFS servers
generally try to make them look like directories in FIND_FIRST/NEXT
responses. When you go to try to do a FIND_FIRST on them though, the
server will then (correctly) return STATUS_PATH_NOT_COVERED. Mostly this
manifests as spurious EREMOTE errors back to userland.
This patch attempts to fix this by marking directories that are
discovered via FIND_FIRST/NEXT for revaldiation. When the lookup code
runs across them again, we'll reissue a QPathInfo against them and that
will make it chase the referral properly.
There is some performance penalty involved here and no I haven't
measured it -- it'll be highly dependent upon the workload and contents
of the mounted share. To try and mitigate that though, the code only
marks the inode for revalidation when it's possible to run across a DFS
referral. i.e.: when the kernel has DFS support built in and the share
is "in DFS"
[At the Microsoft plugfest we noted that usually the DFS links had
the REPARSE attribute tag enabled - DFS junctions are reparse points
after all - so I just added a check for that flag too so the
performance impact should be smaller - Steve]
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
This worker function is needed to send SMB2 fsctl
(and ioctl) requests including:
validating negotiation info (secure negotiate)
querying the servers network interfaces
copy offload (refcopy)
Followon patches for the above three will use this.
This patch also does general validation of the response.
In the future, as David Disseldorp notes, for the copychunk ioctl
case, we will want to enhance the response processing to allow
returning the chunk request limits to the caller (even
though the server returns an error, in that case we would
return data that the caller could use - see 2.2.32.1).
See MS-SMB2 Section 2.2.31 for more details on format of fsctl.
Acked-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
In SMB2.1 and later the server will usually set the large MTU flag, and
we need to charge at least one credit, if server says that since
it supports multicredit. Windows seems to let us get away with putting
a zero there, but they confirmed that it is wrong and the spec says
to put one there (if the request is under 64K and the CAP_LARGE_MTU
was returned during protocol negotiation by the server.
CC: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Cut and paste likely introduced accidentally inserted spurious #define
in d60622eb5a causes no harm but looks weird
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
MS-SMB2 Section 2.2.31 lists fsctls. Update our list of valid
cifs/smb2/smb3 fsctls and some related structs
based on more recent version of docs. Additional detail on
less common ones can be found in MS-FSCC section 2.3.
CopyChunk (server side copy, ie refcopy) will depend on a few
of these
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
More than 160 fixes since we last bumped the version number of cifs.ko.
Update to version 2.01 so it is easier in modinfo to tell
that fixes are in.
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
SMB3 protocol adds various optional per-share capabilities (and
SMB3.02 adds one more beyond that). Add ability to dump
(/proc/fs/cifs/DebugData) the share capabilities and share flags to
improve debugging.
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
A few missing flags from SMB3.0 dialect, one missing from 2.1, and the
new #define flags for SMB3.02
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
The new Windows update supports SMB3.02 dialect, a minor update to SMB3.
This patch adds support for mounting with vers=3.02
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
The SecurityFlags handler uses an obsolete simple_strtoul() call, and
doesn't really handle the bounds checking well. Fix it to use
kstrtouint() instead. Clean up the error messages as well and fix a
bogus check for an unsigned int to be less than 0.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Before this patchset, the global_secflags could only offer up a single
sectype. With the new set though we have the ability to allow different
sectypes since we sort out the one to use after talking to the server.
Change the global_secflags to allow NTLMSSP or NTLMv2 by default. If the
server sets the extended security bit in the Negotiate response, then
we'll use NTLMSSP. If it doesn't then we'll use raw NTLMv2. Mounting a
LANMAN server will still require a sec= option by default.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Now that we track what sort of NEGOTIATE response was received, stop
mandating that every session on a socket use the same type of auth.
Push that decision out into the session setup code, and make the sectype
a per-session property. This should allow us to mix multiple sectypes on
a socket as long as they are compatible with the NEGOTIATE response.
With this too, we can now eliminate the ses->secFlg field since that
info is redundant and harder to work with than a securityEnum.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Currently, we determine this according to flags in the sec_mode, flags
in the global_secflags and via other methods. That makes the semantics
very hard to follow and there are corner cases where we don't handle
this correctly.
Add a new bool to the TCP_Server_Info that acts as a simple flag to tell
us whether signing is enabled on this connection or not, and fix up the
places that need to determine this to use that flag.
This is a bit weird for the SMB2 case, where signing is per-session.
SMB2 needs work in this area already though. The existing SMB2 code has
similar logic to what we're using here, so there should be no real
change in behavior. These changes should make it easier to implement
per-session signing in the future though.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
We have this to some degree already in secFlgs, but those get "or'ed" so
there's no way to know what the last option requested was. Add new fields
that will eventually supercede the secFlgs field in the cifs_ses.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Currently we have the overrideSecFlg field, but it's quite cumbersome
to work with. Add some new fields that will eventually supercede it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Track what sort of NEGOTIATE response we get from the server, as that
will govern what sort of authentication types this socket will support.
There are three possibilities:
LANMAN: server sent legacy LANMAN-type response
UNENCAP: server sent a newer-style response, but extended security bit
wasn't set. This socket will only support unencapsulated auth types.
EXTENDED: server sent a newer-style response with the extended security
bit set. This is necessary to support krb5 and ntlmssp auth types.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Add a new securityEnum value to cover the case where a sec= option
was not explicitly set.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Move the sanity checks for signed connections into a separate function.
SMB2's was a cut-and-paste job from CIFS code, so we can make them use
the same function.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
