Commit Graph

1425 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rafael J. Wysocki
ad3399c378 ACPI: Fix acpi_pm_device_sleep_state()
Fix acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() to return the value returned
by _SxD if the device is supposed to wake up the system from
given sleep state and the evaluation of _SxW fails (e.g. _SxW
is not present).

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-01-11 23:21:52 -05:00
Len Brown
8df042e85c Pull bugzilla-9683 into release branch 2008-01-11 12:28:38 -05:00
Len Brown
456212017b Pull bugzilla-9627 into release branch 2008-01-11 12:28:22 -05:00
Len Brown
4e1b83ad61 Pull bugzilla-9494 into release branch 2008-01-11 12:27:32 -05:00
Len Brown
02d5bccf8e Pull bugzilla-9194 into release branch 2008-01-11 12:27:13 -05:00
Len Brown
9f9adecd2d PM: ACPI and APM must not be enabled at the same time
ACPI and APM used "pm_active" to guarantee that
they would not be simultaneously active.

But pm_active was recently moved under CONFIG_PM_LEGACY,
so that without CONFIG_PM_LEGACY, pm_active became a NOP --
allowing ACPI and APM to both be simultaneously enabled.
This caused unpredictable results, including boot hangs.

Further, the code under CONFIG_PM_LEGACY is scheduled
for removal.

So replace pm_active with pm_flags.
pm_flags depends only on CONFIG_PM,
which is present for both CONFIG_APM and CONFIG_ACPI.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9194

Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2008-01-11 12:26:47 -05:00
Len Brown
aa7f00741d Pull bugzilla-8171 into release branch 2008-01-11 12:22:57 -05:00
Bob Moore
014d433f35 ACPICA: fix acpi_serialize hang regression
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8171

Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-01-10 23:04:10 -05:00
Alan Cox
96c2a8766b ACPI : Not register gsi for PCI IDE controller in legacy mode
When PCI IDE controller works in legacy mode and no PRT entry is found
in ACPI PRT table, OSPM will neither read the irq number from the IDE
PCI configuration space nor call the function of acpi_register_gsi to
register gsi.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5637

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-01-10 22:49:58 -05:00
Alexey Starikovskiy
b3b233c7d9 ACPI: EC: Some hardware requires burst mode to operate properly
Burst mode temporary (50 ms) locks EC to do only transactions with
driver, without it some hardware returns abstract garbage.

Reference: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9341

Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-01-10 20:50:12 -05:00
Alexey Starikovskiy
3e71a87d03 ACPI: EC: Do the byte access with a fast path
Specification allows only byte access for EC region, so
make it separate from bug-compatible multi-byte access.
Also do not allow return of garbage in supplied *value.

Reference: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9341

Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-01-10 20:49:14 -05:00
Zhang Rui
cfaf3747ff ACPI: ACPI Exception (): AE_NOT_FOUND, Processor Device is not present
ACPI Exception (acpi_processor-0677): AE_NOT_FOUND, Processor Device is not
present [20060707]

According to the ACPI spec 6.3.7,
"If a device object (including the processor object) does not have an
_STA object, then OSPM assumes that all of the above bits are set,
(in other words, the device is present, enabled, shown in the UI
and funtioning)".

is_processor_present shoud return 1 if the processor device object exists
while it doesn't have an _STA object.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8570

Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-01-09 02:17:47 -05:00
Venki Pallipadi
5b3f0e6c1c ACPI: Reintroduce run time configurable max_cstate for !CPU_IDLE case
This was writeable in 2.6.23 but the cpuidle merge made it read-only.  But
some people's scripts (ie: Mark's) were writing to it.

As an unhappy compromise, make max_cstate writeable again if the kernel was
configured without CONFIG_CPU_IDLE.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9683

Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-01-07 17:50:10 -05:00
Alexey Starikovskiy
97749cd9ad ACPI: Make sysfs interface in ACPI power optional.
Reference: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9494

Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-01-01 14:27:24 -05:00
Alexey Starikovskiy
c04209a794 ACPI: EC: Enable boot EC before bus_scan
Some _STA methods called during bus_scan() might require EC region handler,
which might be enabled later in the scan.
Enable it explicitly before scan to avoid errors.

Reference: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9627

Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-01-01 14:12:55 -05:00
Thomas Renninger
623b78c39c ACPI: add "processor.ignore_ppc" hook to workaround BIOS _PPC weirdness
There have been fixes using _PPC, which seem to unhide a problem
on HP nx6125 (double cpufreq switch freezes the machine for
several seconds).

This one should provide a workaround for the nx6125 and for
possible other machines that show any weird _PPC behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-01-01 13:24:38 -05:00
Signed-off by Yi Yang
975c30257e ACPI: detect invalid argument written to /proc/acpi/alarm
/proc/acpi/alarm can't be set correctly, here is a sample:

[root@localhost /]# echo "2006 09" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
2007-12-09 09:09:09
[root@localhost /]# echo "2006 04" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
2007-12-04 04:04:04
[root@localhost /]#

Obviously, it is wrong, it should consider it as an invalid input.

after this patch:

[root@localhost /]# echo "2008 09" > /proc/acpi/alarm
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost /]#

Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-12-27 22:19:27 -05:00
Yi Yang
0879802950 ACPI: /proc/acpi/alarm parsing: handle large numbers properly
In function acpi_system_write_alarm in file drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c,
big sec, min, hr, mo, day and yr are counted twice to get reasonable
values, that is very superfluous, we can do that only once.

In additon, /proc/acpi/alarm can set a related value which can be
specified as YYYY years MM months DD days HH hours MM minutes SS
senconds, it isn't a date, so you can specify as +0000-00-00 96:00:00
, that means 3 days later, current code can't handle such a case.

This patch removes unnecessary code and does with the aforementioned
situation.

Before applying this patch:

[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
2007-12-00 00:00:00
[root@localhost /]# echo "0000-00-00 96:180:180" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
0007-12-02 **:**:**
[root@localhost /]#

After applying this patch:

[root@localhost ~]# echo "2007-12-00 00:00:00" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
2007-12-00 00:00:00
[root@localhost ~]# echo "0000-00-00 96:180:180" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
0007-12-04 03:03:00
[root@localhost ~]#

Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-12-27 22:04:26 -05:00
Len Brown
6e3013932e Pull bugzilla-9362 into release branch 2007-12-14 15:14:52 -05:00
Alexey Starikovskiy
5a21e4fe58 ACPI: SBS: Return rate in mW if capacity in mWh
klaptopd assumes rate to be in same units as capacity.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9362

Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-12-14 15:14:23 -05:00
Alexey Starikovskiy
c2d00f2d1b ACPI: SBS: Ignore alarms coming from unknown devices
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9362

Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-12-14 15:14:06 -05:00
Alexey Starikovskiy
09f1fb41ad ACPI: SBS: Reset alarm bit
Alarm bit should be cleared in order for other alarms to be sent.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9362

Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-12-14 15:13:51 -05:00
Len Brown
5889ba0a6a Pull hotplug into release branch 2007-12-14 14:54:09 -05:00
Len Brown
239665a3bb ACPI: tables: complete searching upon RSDP w/ bad checksum.
ACPI tables follow a tree structure in memory.
The root of the tree is the RSDP (Root System Description Pointer).

To find the RSDP, the OS searches for the signature "RSD PTR "
in well known physical memory locations.  Then the OS computes
a table checksum to verify that the signature is really part
of a valid table header.

Some systems have a proper signature but an invalid checksum;
followed elsewhere by a proper signature with valid checksum.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9444

The Linux RSDP scanning code bailed out on those systems
and as a result they booted with ACPI disabled.

Fix this by deleting the Linux RSDP scanning code and
plugging in the ACPICA RSDP scanning code.

Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-12-14 02:36:24 -05:00
Len Brown
25de571835 cpuidle: default processor.latency_factor=2
More aggressively request deep C-states.

Note that the job of the OS is to minimize latency
impact to expected break events such as interrupts.

It is not the job of the OS to try to calculate if
the C-state will reach energy break-even.
The platform doesn't give the OS enough information
for it to make that calculation.  Thus, it is up
to the platform to decide if it is worth it to
go as deep as the OS requested it to, or if it
should internally demote to a more shallow C-state.

But the converse is not true.  The platform can not
promote into a deeper C-state than the OS requested
else it may violate latency constraints.  So it is
important that the OS be aggressive in giving the
platform permission to enter deep C-states.

Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-12-14 00:24:15 -05:00