dmi_check_system() does sub-string matching using strstr(),
rather than exact string compares with !strcmp().
So delete the longer of the Acer blacklist entries, as its
function is just a redundant console message.
Spotted-by: Carlos Corbacho <carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
According to ACPI spec, the _TSD object provides T-state control cross
logical processor dependency information to OSPM. So the t-state
coordination should be considered when T-state for one cpu is changed.
According to ACPI spec, three types of coordination are defined.
SW_ALL, SW_ANY and HW_ALL.
SW_ALL: it means that OSPM needs to initiate T-state transition on
all processors in the domain. It is necessary to call throttling set function
for all affected cpus.
SW_ANY: it means that OSPM may initiate T-state transition on any processor in
the domain.
HW_ALL: Spec only says that hardware will perform the coordination and doesn't
recommend how OSPM coordinate T-state among the affected cpus. So it is treated
as the type of SW_ALL. It means that OSPM needs to initiate t-state transition
on all the processors in the domain.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The t-state coordination should be considered when T-state for one cpu
is changed.It means that OSPM should select one proper target T-state for
the all affected cpus before updating T-state.
So the function of acpi_processor_throttling_notifier is added.
Before updating T-state it can be called for all the affected cpus to get
the proper target T-state, which can meet the requirement of thermal, user and
_TPC. After updating T-state, it can be called to update T-state flag.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Accordint to ACPI spec, the _TSD object provides T-state control cross
logical processor dependency information to OSPM.
After the _TSD data for all cpus are obtained, OSPM will set up
the T-state coordination between CPUs.
Of course if the _TSD doesn't exist or _TSD data is incorrect , it is
assumed that there is no T-state coordination and T-state is changed
independently.
Now there is no proper solution to update T-state coordination after
one cpu is hotplugged. So this patch won't support hotplugged cpu very well.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Vendors often ship machines with a choice of integrated or discrete
graphics, and use the same DSDT for both. As a result, the ACPI video
module will locate devices that may not exist on this specific platform.
Attempt to determine whether the device exists or not, and abort the
device creation if it doesn't.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9614
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The alias name may be used in _PSL, _ALx and _TZD,
so we bind the cooling device only if the acpi_device node matches.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sujith <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Intel menlow driver needs to get the pointer of themal_zone_device
structure of an ACPI thermal zone.
Attach this to each ACPI thermal zone device object.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sujith <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Register ACPI video device as thermal cooling devices as they may be listed
in _TZD method and the backlight control can be used for throttling.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sujith <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Register ACPI processor as thermal cooling devices.
A combination of processor T-state and P-state are used for thermal throttling.
the processor will reduce the frequency first and then set the T-state.
we use cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg to calculate the cpufreq limit,
and call cpufreq_verify_with_limit to set the cpufreq limit.
if cpufreq driver is loaded, then we have four cooling state for cpufreq control.
cooling state 0: cpufreq limit == max_freq
cooling state 1: cpufreq limit == max_freq * 80%
cooling state 2: cpufreq limit == max_freq * 60%
cooling state 3: cpufreq limit == max_freq * 40%
after the cpufreq limit is set to 40 percentage of the max_freq,
we use T-state for cooling.
eg. a processor has P-state support, and it has 8 T-state (T0-T7),
the max_state of the proceesor is 10:
state cpufreq-limit T-state
0: max_freq T0
1: max_freq * 80% T0
2: max_freq * 60% T0
3: max_freq * 40% T0
4: max_freq * 40% T1
5: max_freq * 40% T2
6: max_freq * 40% T3
7: max_freq * 40% T4
8: max_freq * 40% T5
9: max_freq * 40% T6
10: max_freq * 40% T7
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sujith <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Change the ACPI thermal action upon notification 0x81 and 0x82.
According to the ACPI spec, we should:
re-evaluate _PSV and _ACx methods upon notification 0x81
re-evaluate _PSL and _ALx and _TZD upon notificaiton 0x82.
But the current code re-evaluates all the trip points for 0x81 while
only re-evaluates _TZD for 0x82.
Fix this violation of ACPI spec.
TODO: devices in _PSL, _ALx and _TZD may change after a notification 0x82.
At this time, we need to re-bind the cooling devices with the thermal zone.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sujith <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Register ACPI thermal zone as thermal zone device.
the new sys I/F for ACPI thermal zone will be like this:
/sys/class/thermal:
|thermal_zone1:
|-----type: "ACPI thermal zone". RO
|-----temp: the current temperature. RO
|-----mode: the current working mode. RW.
the default value is "kernel" which means thermal
management is done by ACPI thermal driver.
"echo user > mode" prevents all the ACPI thermal driver
actions upon any trip points.
|-----trip_point_0_temp: the threshold of trip point 0. RO.
|-----trip_point_0_type: "critical". RO.
the type of trip point 0
This may be one of critical/hot/passive/active[x]
for an ACPI thermal zone.
...
|-----trip_point_3_temp:
|-----trip_point_3_type: "active[1]"
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sujith <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The sysfs backlight class provides no mechanism for querying the
acceptable brightness for a backlight. The ACPI spec states that values
are only valid if they are reported as available by the firmware. Since
we can't provide that information to userspace, instead collapse the
range to the number of actual values that can be set.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9277
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Make acpi_sleep_prepare() static and cause it to print a message
specifying the ACPI system sleep state to be entered (helpful for
debugging the suspend/hibernation code).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The ACPI 1.0 specification wants us to put devices into low power
states after executing the _PTS global control method, while ACPI
2.0 and later want us to do that in the reverse order. The current
hibernation code follows ACPI 2.0 in that respect which may cause some
ACPI 1.0x systems to hang during hibernation (ref.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528).
Make the hibernation code execute _PTS before putting devices into
low power states (ie. in accordance with ACPI 1.0x) with the
possibility to override that using the 'acpi_new_pts_ordering' kernel
command line option.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Introduce global hibernation callback .end() and rename global
hibernation callback .start() to .begin(), in analogy with the
recent modifications of the global suspend callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The ACPI 1.0 specification wants us to put devices into low power
states after executing the _PTS global control method, while ACPI
2.0 and later want us to do that in the reverse order. The current
suspend code follows ACPI 2.0 in that respect which causes some
ACPI 1.0x systems to hang during suspend (ref.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528).
Make the suspend code execute _PTS before putting devices into low
power states (ie. in accordance with ACPI 1.0x) and provide a command
line option to override the default if need be.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The preparation to enter an ACPI system sleep state is now tied to
the disabling of GPEs, but the GPEs should not be disabled before
suspending devices. Since on ACPI 1.0x systems the _PTS global
control method should be executed before suspending devices, we
need to disable GPEs separately.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The execution of ACPI global control methods _GTS and _BFS is
currently tied to the preparation to enter a sleep state and to the
leaving of the sleep state, respectively. However, these functions
are called before disabling the nonboot CPUs and after enabling
them, respectively (in fact, on ACPI 1.0x systems the first of them
ought to be called before suspending devices), while according to the
ACPI specification, _GTS is to be executed right prior to entering
the system sleep state and _BFS is to be executed right after the
platfor firmware has returned control to the OS on wake up.
Move the execution of _GTS and _BFS to the right places.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
On ACPI systems the target state set by acpi_pm_set_target() is
reset by acpi_pm_finish(), but that need not be called if the
suspend fails. All platforms that use the .set_target() global
suspend callback are affected by analogous issues.
For this reason, we need an additional global suspend callback that
will reset the target state regardless of whether or not the suspend
is successful. Also, it is reasonable to rename the .set_target()
callback, since it will be used for a different purpose on ACPI
systems (due to ACPI 1.0x code ordering requirements).
Introduce the global suspend callback .end() to be executed at the
end of the suspend sequence and rename the .set_target() global
suspend callback to .begin().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
