armbian/linux
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/armbian/linux.git synced 2026-01-06 10:13:00 -08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

mempolicy: fix a race in shared_policy_replace()

Browse Source 
commit b22d127a39 upstream.

shared_policy_replace() use of sp_alloc() is unsafe.  1) sp_node cannot
be dereferenced if sp->lock is not held and 2) another thread can modify
sp_node between spin_unlock for allocating a new sp node and next
spin_lock.  The bug was introduced before 2.6.12-rc2.

Kosaki's original patch for this problem was to allocate an sp node and
policy within shared_policy_replace and initialise it when the lock is
reacquired.  I was not keen on this approach because it partially
duplicates sp_alloc().  As the paths were sp->lock is taken are not that
performance critical this patch converts sp->lock to sp->mutex so it can
sleep when calling sp_alloc().

[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: Original patch]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Mel Gorman
2012-10-08 16:29:17 -07:00
committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent e12681ffb1
commit cedd186e31
2 changed files with 17 additions and 22 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
include/linux/mempolicy.h
View File

@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ struct sp_node {
struct shared_policy {
struct rb_root root;
spinlock_t lock;
struct mutex mutex;
};
void mpol_shared_policy_init(struct shared_policy *sp, struct mempolicy *mpol);

37
mm/mempolicy.c
View File

@@ -2021,7 +2021,7 @@ int __mpol_equal(struct mempolicy *a, struct mempolicy *b)
*/
/* lookup first element intersecting start-end */
/* Caller holds sp->lock */
/* Caller holds sp->mutex */
static struct sp_node *
sp_lookup(struct shared_policy *sp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
@@ -2085,13 +2085,13 @@ mpol_shared_policy_lookup(struct shared_policy *sp, unsigned long idx)
if (!sp->root.rb_node)
return NULL;
spin_lock(&sp->lock);
mutex_lock(&sp->mutex);
sn = sp_lookup(sp, idx, idx+1);
if (sn) {
mpol_get(sn->policy);
pol = sn->policy;
}
spin_unlock(&sp->lock);
mutex_unlock(&sp->mutex);
return pol;
}
@@ -2131,10 +2131,10 @@ static struct sp_node *sp_alloc(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
static int shared_policy_replace(struct shared_policy *sp, unsigned long start,
unsigned long end, struct sp_node *new)
{
struct sp_node *n, *new2 = NULL;
struct sp_node *n;
int ret = 0;
restart:
spin_lock(&sp->lock);
mutex_lock(&sp->mutex);
n = sp_lookup(sp, start, end);
/* Take care of old policies in the same range. */
while (n && n->start < end) {
@@ -2147,16 +2147,14 @@ restart:
} else {
/* Old policy spanning whole new range. */
if (n->end > end) {
struct sp_node *new2;
new2 = sp_alloc(end, n->end, n->policy);
if (!new2) {
spin_unlock(&sp->lock);
new2 = sp_alloc(end, n->end, n->policy);
if (!new2)
return -ENOMEM;
goto restart;
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
n->end = start;
sp_insert(sp, new2);
new2 = NULL;
break;
} else
n->end = start;
@@ -2167,12 +2165,9 @@ restart:
}
if (new)
sp_insert(sp, new);
spin_unlock(&sp->lock);
if (new2) {
mpol_put(new2->policy);
kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, new2);
}
return 0;
out:
mutex_unlock(&sp->mutex);
return ret;
}
/**
@@ -2190,7 +2185,7 @@ void mpol_shared_policy_init(struct shared_policy *sp, struct mempolicy *mpol)
int ret;
sp->root = RB_ROOT; /* empty tree == default mempolicy */
spin_lock_init(&sp->lock);
mutex_init(&sp->mutex);
if (mpol) {
struct vm_area_struct pvma;
@@ -2256,7 +2251,7 @@ void mpol_free_shared_policy(struct shared_policy *p)
if (!p->root.rb_node)
return;
spin_lock(&p->lock);
mutex_lock(&p->mutex);
next = rb_first(&p->root);
while (next) {
n = rb_entry(next, struct sp_node, nd);
@@ -2265,7 +2260,7 @@ void mpol_free_shared_policy(struct shared_policy *p)
mpol_put(n->policy);
kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, n);
}
spin_unlock(&p->lock);
mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
}
/* assumes fs == KERNEL_DS */