Use the helper function time_is_{before,after}_jiffies() to improve
code readability.
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Use the helper function time_is_{before,after}_jiffies() to improve
code readability.
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Use the helper function time_is_{before,after}_jiffies() to improve
code readability.
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Use the helper function time_is_{before,after}_jiffies() to improve
code readability.
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Use the helper function time_is_{before,after}_jiffies() to improve
code readability.
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Use the helper function time_is_{before,after}_jiffies() to improve
code readability.
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
As all users of phylink_set_pcs() have now been updated to use the
mac_select_pcs() method, it can be removed from the phylink kernel
API and its functionality moved into phylink_major_config().
Removing phylink_set_pcs() gives us a single approach for attaching
a PCS within phylink.
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Make sure we don't try to transition the fw_status_ready
while we're still in the FW_STOPPING state, else we can
get stuck in limbo waiting on a transition that already
happened.
While we're here we can remove a superfluous check on
the lif pointer.
Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Both rps_sock_flow_sysctl() and flow_limit_cpu_sysctl()
are using synchronize_rcu() right before freeing memory
either by vfree() or kfree()
They can switch to kvfree_rcu(ptr) and kfree_rcu(ptr) to benefit
from asynchronous mode, instead of blocking the current thread.
Note that kvfree_rcu(ptr) and kfree_rcu(ptr) eventually can
have to use synchronize_rcu() in some memory pressure cases.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Jianbo Liu says:
====================
flow_offload: add tc police parameters
As a preparation for more advanced police offload in mlx5 (e.g.,
jumping to another chain when bandwidth is not exceeded), extend the
flow offload API with more tc-police parameters. Adjust existing
drivers to reject unsupported configurations.
Changes since v2:
* Rename index to extval in exceed and notexceed acts.
* Add policer validate functions for all drivers.
Changes since v1:
* Add one more strict validation for the control of drop/ok.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
As more police parameters are passed to flow_offload, driver can check
them to make sure hardware handles packets in the way indicated by tc.
The conform-exceed control should be drop/pipe or drop/ok. Besides,
for drop/ok, the police should be the last action. As hardware can't
configure peakrate/avrate/overhead, offload should not be supported if
any of them is configured.
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The current police offload action entry is missing exceed/notexceed
actions and parameters that can be configured by tc police action.
Add the missing parameters as a pre-step for offloading police actions
to hardware.
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Vladimir Oltean says:
====================
DSA FDB isolation
There are use cases which need FDB isolation between standalone ports
and bridged ports, as well as isolation between ports of different
bridges. Most of these use cases are a result of the fact that packets
can now be partially forwarded by the software bridge, so one port might
need to send a packet to the CPU but its FDB lookup will see that it can
forward it directly to a bridge port where that packet was autonomously
learned. So the source port will attempt to shortcircuit the CPU and
forward autonomously, which it can't due to the forwarding isolation we
have in place. So we will have packet drops instead of proper operation.
Additionally, before DSA can implement IFF_UNICAST_FLT for standalone
ports, we must have control over which database we install FDB entries
corresponding to port MAC addresses in. We don't want to hinder the
operation of the bridging layer.
DSA does not have a driver API that encourages FDB isolation, so this
needs to be created. The basis for this is a new struct dsa_db which
annotates each FDB and MDB entry with the database it belongs to.
The sja1105 and felix drivers are modified to observe the dsa_db
argument, and therefore, enforce the FDB isolation.
Compared to the previous RFC patch series from August:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20210818120150.892647-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com/
what is different is that I stopped trying to make SWITCHDEV_FDB_{ADD,DEL}_TO_DEVICE
blocking, instead I'm making use of the fact that DSA waits for switchdev FDB work
items to finish before a port leaves the bridge. This is possible since:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20211024171757.3753288-7-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com/
Additionally, v2 is also rebased over the DSA LAG FDB work.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Currently ocelot uses a pvid of 0 for standalone ports and ports under a
VLAN-unaware bridge, and the pvid of the bridge for ports under a
VLAN-aware bridge. Standalone ports do not perform learning, but packets
received on them are still subject to FDB lookups. So if the MAC DA that
a standalone port receives has been also learned on a VLAN-unaware
bridge port, ocelot will attempt to forward to that port, even though it
can't, so it will drop packets.
So there is a desire to avoid that, and isolate the FDBs of different
bridges from one another, and from standalone ports.
The ocelot switch library has two distinct entry points: the felix DSA
driver and the ocelot switchdev driver.
We need to code up a minimal bridge_num allocation in the ocelot
switchdev driver too, this is copied from DSA with the exception that
ocelot does not care about DSA trees, cross-chip bridging etc. So it
only looks at its own ports that are already in the same bridge.
The ocelot switchdev driver uses the bridge_num it has allocated itself,
while the felix driver uses the bridge_num allocated by DSA. They are
both stored inside ocelot_port->bridge_num by the common function
ocelot_port_bridge_join() which receives the bridge_num passed by value.
Once we have a bridge_num, we can only use it to enforce isolation
between VLAN-unaware bridges. As far as I can see, ocelot does not have
anything like a FID that further makes VLAN 100 from a port be different
to VLAN 100 from another port with regard to FDB lookup. So we simply
deny multiple VLAN-aware bridges.
For VLAN-unaware bridges, we crop the 4000-4095 VLAN region and we
allocate a VLAN for each bridge_num. This will be used as the pvid of
each port that is under that VLAN-unaware bridge, for as long as that
bridge is VLAN-unaware.
VID 0 remains only for standalone ports. It is okay if all standalone
ports use the same VID 0, since they perform no address learning, the
FDB will contain no entry in VLAN 0, so the packets will always be
flooded to the only possible destination, the CPU port.
The CPU port module doesn't need to be member of the VLANs to receive
packets, but if we use the DSA tag_8021q protocol, those packets are
part of the data plane as far as ocelot is concerned, so there it needs
to. Just ensure that the DSA tag_8021q CPU port is a member of all
reserved VLANs when it is created, and is removed when it is deleted.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
For sja1105, to enforce FDB isolation simply means to turn on
Independent VLAN Learning unconditionally, and to remap VLAN-unaware FDB
and MDB entries towards the private VLAN allocated by tag_8021q for each
bridge.
Standalone ports each have their own standalone tag_8021q VLAN. No
learning happens in that VLAN due to:
- learning being disabled on standalone user ports
- learning being disabled on the CPU port (we use
assisted_learning_on_cpu_port which only installs bridge FDBs)
VLAN-aware ports learn FDB entries with the bridge VLANs.
VLAN-unaware bridge ports learn with the tag_8021q VLAN for bridging.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
As FDB isolation cannot be enforced between VLAN-aware bridges in lack
of hardware assistance like extra FID bits, it seems plausible that many
DSA switches cannot do it. Therefore, they need to reject configurations
with multiple VLAN-aware bridges from the two code paths that can
transition towards that state:
- joining a VLAN-aware bridge
- toggling VLAN awareness on an existing bridge
The .port_vlan_filtering method already propagates the netlink extack to
the driver, let's propagate it from .port_bridge_join too, to make sure
that the driver can use the same function for both.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
For DSA, to encourage drivers to perform FDB isolation simply means to
track which bridge does each FDB and MDB entry belong to. It then
becomes the driver responsibility to use something that makes the FDB
entry from one bridge not match the FDB lookup of ports from other
bridges.
The top-level functions where the bridge is determined are:
- dsa_port_fdb_{add,del}
- dsa_port_host_fdb_{add,del}
- dsa_port_mdb_{add,del}
- dsa_port_host_mdb_{add,del}
aka the pre-crosschip-notifier functions.
Changing the API to pass a reference to a bridge is not superfluous, and
looking at the passed bridge argument is not the same as having the
driver look at dsa_to_port(ds, port)->bridge from the ->port_fdb_add()
method.
DSA installs FDB and MDB entries on shared (CPU and DSA) ports as well,
and those do not have any dp->bridge information to retrieve, because
they are not in any bridge - they are merely the pipes that serve the
user ports that are in one or multiple bridges.
The struct dsa_bridge associated with each FDB/MDB entry is encapsulated
in a larger "struct dsa_db" database. Although only databases associated
to bridges are notified for now, this API will be the starting point for
implementing IFF_UNICAST_FLT in DSA. There, the idea is to install FDB
entries on the CPU port which belong to the corresponding user port's
port database. These are supposed to match only when the port is
standalone.
It is better to introduce the API in its expected final form than to
introduce it for bridges first, then to have to change drivers which may
have made one or more assumptions.
Drivers can use the provided bridge.num, but they can also use a
different numbering scheme that is more convenient.
DSA must perform refcounting on the CPU and DSA ports by also taking
into account the bridge number. So if two bridges request the same local
address, DSA must notify the driver twice, once for each bridge.
In fact, if the driver supports FDB isolation, DSA must perform
refcounting per bridge, but if the driver doesn't, DSA must refcount
host addresses across all bridges, otherwise it would be telling the
driver to delete an FDB entry for a bridge and the driver would delete
it for all bridges. So introduce a bool fdb_isolation in drivers which
would make all bridge databases passed to the cross-chip notifier have
the same number (0). This makes dsa_mac_addr_find() -> dsa_db_equal()
say that all bridge databases are the same database - which is
essentially the legacy behavior.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The dsa_8021q_bridge_tx_fwd_offload_vid is no longer used just for
bridge TX forwarding offload, it is the private VLAN reserved for
VLAN-unaware bridging in a way that is compatible with FDB isolation.
So just rename it dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_vid.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In the old Shared VLAN Learning mode of operation that tag_8021q
previously used for forwarding, we needed to have distinct concepts for
an RX and a TX VLAN.
An RX VLAN could be installed on all ports that were members of a given
bridge, so that autonomous forwarding could still work, while a TX VLAN
was dedicated for precise packet steering, so it just contained the CPU
port and one egress port.
Now that tag_8021q uses Independent VLAN Learning and imprecise RX/TX
all over, those lines have been blurred and we no longer have the need
to do precise TX towards a port that is in a bridge. As for standalone
ports, it is fine to use the same VLAN ID for both RX and TX.
This patch changes the tag_8021q format by shifting the VLAN range it
reserves, and halving it. Previously, our DIR bits were encoding the
VLAN direction (RX/TX) and were set to either 1 or 2. This meant that
tag_8021q reserved 2K VLANs, or 50% of the available range.
Change the DIR bits to a hardcoded value of 3 now, which makes tag_8021q
reserve only 1K VLANs, and a different range now (the last 1K). This is
done so that we leave the old format in place in case we need to return
to it.
In terms of code, the vid_is_dsa_8021q_rxvlan and vid_is_dsa_8021q_txvlan
functions go away. Any vid_is_dsa_8021q is both a TX and an RX VLAN, and
they are no longer distinct. For example, felix which did different
things for different VLAN types, now needs to handle the RX and the TX
logic for the same VLAN.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The felix driver, which also has a tagging protocol implementation based
on tag_8021q, does not care about adding the RX VLAN that is pvid on one
port on the other ports that are in the same bridge with it. It simply
doesn't need that, because in its implementation, the RX VLAN that is
pvid of a port is only used to install a TCAM rule that pushes that VLAN
ID towards the CPU port.
Now that tag_8021q no longer performs Shared VLAN Learning based
forwarding, the RX VLANs are actually segregated into two types:
standalone VLANs and VLAN-unaware bridging VLANs. Since you actually
have to call dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_join() to get a bridging VLAN from
tag_8021q, and felix does not do that because it doesn't need it, it
means that it only gets standalone port VLANs from tag_8021q. Which is
perfect because this means it can drop its workarounds that avoid the
VLANs it does not need.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
After change "net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with
VLAN-unaware IVL bridging", tag_8021q enforces two different pvids on a
port, depending on whether it is standalone or in a VLAN-unaware bridge.
Up until now, there was a single pvid, represented by
dsa_tag_8021q_rx_vid(), and that was used as the VLAN for VLAN-unaware
virtual link rules, regardless of whether the port was bridged or
standalone.
To keep VLAN-unaware virtual links working, we need to follow whether
the port is in a bridge or not, and update the VLAN ID from those rules.
In fact we can't fully do that. Depending on whether the switch is
VLAN-aware or not, we can accept Virtual Link rules with just the MAC
DA, or with a MAC DA and a VID. So we already deny changes to the VLAN
awareness of the switch. But the VLAN awareness may also change as a
result of joining or leaving a bridge.
One might say we could just allow the following: a port may leave a
VLAN-unaware bridge while it has VLAN-unaware VL (tc-flower) rules, and
the driver will update those with the new tag_8021q pvid for standalone
mode, but the driver won't accept joining a bridge at all while VL rules
were installed in standalone mode. This is sort of a compromise made
because leaving a bridge is an operation that cannot be vetoed.
But this sort of setup change is not fully supported, either: as
mentioned, VLAN filtering changes can also be triggered by leaving a
bridge, therefore, the existing veto we have in place for turning VLAN
filtering off with VLAN-aware VL rules active still isn't fully
effective.
I really don't know how to deal with this in a way that produces
predictable behavior for user space. Since at the moment, keeping this
feature fully functional on constellation changes (not changing the
tag_8021q port pvid when joining a bridge) is blocking progress for the
DSA FDB isolation, I'd rather document it as a (potentially temporary)
limitation and go on without it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The sja1105 switch can't populate the PORT field of the tag_8021q header
when sending a frame to the CPU with a non-zero VBID.
Similar to dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid() which performs
imprecise RX for VLAN-aware bridges, let's introduce a helper in
tag_8021q for performing imprecise RX based on the VLAN that it has
allocated for a VLAN-unaware bridge.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
