During regulators registration, if .of_match and .regulators_node are
defined as non-null strings in struct regulator_desc the core searches the
DT subtree rooted at .regulators_node trying to match, at first, .of_match
against the 'regulator-compatible' property and, then, falling back to use
the name of the node itself to determine a good match.
Property 'regulator-compatible', though, is now deprecated and falling back
to match against the node name, works fine only as long as the involved
nodes are named in an unique way across the searched subtree; if that's not
the case, like when using <common-name>@<unit> style naming for properties
indexed via 'reg' property (as advised by the standard), the above matching
mechanism based on the simple common name will lead to multiple matches and
the only viable alternative would be to properly define the now deprecated
'regulator-compatible' as the node full name, i.e. <common-name>@<unit>.
In order to address this case without using such deprecated binding, define
a new boolean flag .of_match_full_name in struct regulator_desc to force
the core to match against the node full-name instead of the plain name.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119191051.46363-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Silence documentation build warning by correcting kernel-doc comments.
./include/linux/regulator/machine.h:196: warning: Function parameter or member 'max_uV_step' not described in 'regulation_constraints'
./include/linux/regulator/driver.h:206: warning: Function parameter or member 'resume' not described in 'regulator_ops'
Signed-off-by: Colton Lewis <colton.w.lewis@protonmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200715191438.29312-1-colton.w.lewis@protonmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Some regulators might need to verify that they have indeed been enabled
after the enable() call is made and enable_time delay has passed.
This is implemented by repeatedly checking is_enabled() upto
poll_enabled_time, waiting for the already calculated enable delay in
each iteration.
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200622124110.20971-2-sumit.semwal@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
regulator_suspend_enable(), regulator_suspend_disable() and
regulator_set_suspend_voltage() are all exported members of the
API, but are all missing prototypes.
Fixes the following W=1 warning(s):
drivers/regulator/core.c:3805:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘regulator_suspend_enable’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
3805 | int regulator_suspend_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/regulator/core.c:3812:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘regulator_suspend_disable’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
3812 | int regulator_suspend_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/regulator/core.c:3851:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘regulator_set_suspend_voltage’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
3851 | int regulator_set_suspend_voltage(struct regulator *regulator, int min_uV,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200625163614.4001403-2-lee.jones@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Hi!
This patchset is another attempt to fix the regulator coupling on
Exynos5800/5422 SoCs. Here are links to the previous attempts:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/20191008101709.qVNy8eijBi0LynOteWFMnTg4GUwKG599n6OyYoX1Abs@z/https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191017102758.8104-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/cover.1589528491.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200528131130.17984-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/
The problem is with "vdd_int" regulator coupled with "vdd_arm" on Odroid
XU3/XU4 boards family. "vdd_arm" is handled by CPUfreq. "vdd_int" is
handled by devfreq. CPUfreq initialized quite early during boot and it
starts changing OPPs and "vdd_arm" value. Sometimes CPU activity during
boot goes down and some low-frequency OPPs are selected, what in turn
causes lowering "vdd_arm". This happens before devfreq applies its
requirements on "vdd_int". Regulator balancing code reduces "vdd_arm"
voltage value, what in turn causes lowering "vdd_int" value to the lowest
possible value. This is much below the operation point of the wcore bus,
which still runs at the highest frequency.
The issue was hard to notice because in the most cases the board managed
to boot properly, even when the regulator was set to lowest value allowed
by the regulator constraints. However, it caused some random issues,
which can be observed as "Unhandled prefetch abort" or low USB stability.
Adding more and more special cases to the generic code has been rejected,
so the only way to ensure the desired behavior on Exynos5800-based SoCs
is to make a custom regulator coupler driver.
Best regards,
Marek Szyprowski
Patch summary:
Marek Szyprowski (2):
regulator: extract voltage balancing code to separate function
soc: samsung: Add simple voltage coupler for Exynos5800
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/regulator/core.c | 49 ++++++++-------
drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig | 3 +
drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile | 1 +
.../soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/regulator/coupler.h | 8 +++
6 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c
--
2.17.1
base-commit: 8f3d9f3542
The toolchain produces a warning on this driver when building
the docs:
./include/linux/regulator/driver.h:284: WARNING: Unknown target name: "regulator_regmap_x_voltage".
While fixing it, we notices that there's no function names
with the above pattern. It seems that some previous patch
renamed it to regulator_map_* instead.
So, change the function name, replacing "x" by "*", with is
a more used way to add a wildcard, and escape those with
``literal`` markup, in order to avoid the toolchain to think
that this is a link to some existing document chapter.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b9f5687bcf981a88c9d1fd04d759a540fda53a99.1584456635.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The USB regulator was removed for AB8500 in
commit 41a06aa738 ("regulator: ab8500: Remove USB regulator").
It was then added for AB8505 in
commit 547f384f33 ("regulator: ab8500: add support for ab8505").
However, there was never an entry added for it in
ab8505_regulator_match. This causes all regulators after it
to be initialized with the wrong device tree data, eventually
leading to an out-of-bounds array read.
Given that it is not used anywhere in the kernel, it seems
likely that similar arguments against supporting it exist for
AB8505 (it is controlled by hardware).
Therefore, simply remove it like for AB8500 instead of adding
an entry in ab8505_regulator_match.
Fixes: 547f384f33 ("regulator: ab8500: add support for ab8505")
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191106173125.14496-1-stephan@gerhold.net
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Depends on board design, the gpio controlling regulator may
connects with a big capacitance. When need off, it takes some time
to let the regulator to be truly off. If not add enough delay, the
regulator might have always been on, so introduce off-on-delay to
handle such case.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1572311875-22880-3-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
There are many regulator consumers who - before using the regulator
bulk functions - set the supply names in regulator_bulk_data using
a for loop.
Let's provide a simple helper in the consumer API that allows users
to do the same with a single function call.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190830071740.4267-2-brgl@bgdev.pl
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Some regulators require that the requested voltage be reached gradually
by setting all or some of the intermediate values. Implement a new field
in the regulator description struct that allows users to specify the
number of selectors by which the regulator API should step when ramping
the voltage up/down.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190703161035.31808-2-brgl@bgdev.pl
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
