Commit Graph

1186138 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Douglas Anderson
28168eca32 watchdog/hardlockup: move SMP barriers from common code to buddy code
It's been suggested that since the SMP barriers are only potentially
useful for the buddy hardlockup detector, not the perf hardlockup
detector, that the barriers belong in the buddy code.  Let's move them and
add clearer comments about why they're needed.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230526184139.9.I5ab0a0eeb0bd52fb23f901d298c72fa5c396e22b@changeid
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-19 16:25:28 -07:00
Douglas Anderson
7ece48b7b4 watchdog/buddy: simplify the dependency for HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PREFER_BUDDY
The dependency for HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PREFER_BUDDY was more complicated
than it needed to be.  If the "perf" detector is available and we have SMP
then we have a choice, so enable the config based on just those two config
items.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230526184139.8.I49d5b483336b65b8acb1e5066548a05260caf809@changeid
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-19 16:25:28 -07:00
Douglas Anderson
813efda239 watchdog/buddy: don't copy the cpumask in watchdog_next_cpu()
There's no reason to make a copy of the "watchdog_cpus" locally in
watchdog_next_cpu().  Making a copy wouldn't make things any more race
free and we're just reading the value so there's no need for a copy.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230526184139.7.If466f9a2b50884cbf6a1d8ad05525a2c17069407@changeid
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-19 16:25:28 -07:00
Douglas Anderson
d3b62ace0f watchdog/buddy: cleanup how watchdog_buddy_check_hardlockup() is called
In the patch ("watchdog/hardlockup: detect hard lockups using secondary
(buddy) CPUs"), we added a call from the common watchdog.c file into the
buddy.  That call could be done more cleanly.  Specifically:

1. If we move the call into watchdog_hardlockup_kick() then it keeps
   watchdog_timer_fn() simpler.
2. We don't need to pass an "unsigned long" to the buddy for the timer
   count. In the patch ("watchdog/hardlockup: add a "cpu" param to
   watchdog_hardlockup_check()") the count was changed to "atomic_t"
   which is backed by an int, so we should match types.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230526184139.6.I006c7d958a1ea5c4e1e4dc44a25596d9bb5fd3ba@changeid
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-19 16:25:27 -07:00
Douglas Anderson
05e7b55876 watchdog/hardlockup: remove softlockup comment in touch_nmi_watchdog()
In the patch ("watchdog/hardlockup: add comments to touch_nmi_watchdog()")
we adjusted some comments for touch_nmi_watchdog().  The comment about the
softlockup had a typo and were also felt to be too obvious.  Remove it.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230526184139.5.Ia593afc9eb12082d55ea6681dc2c5a89677f20a8@changeid
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-19 16:25:27 -07:00
Douglas Anderson
7a71d8e650 watchdog/hardlockup: in watchdog_hardlockup_check() use cpumask_copy()
In the patch ("watchdog/hardlockup: add a "cpu" param to
watchdog_hardlockup_check()") we started using a cpumask to keep track of
which CPUs to backtrace.  When setting up this cpumask, it's better to use
cpumask_copy() than to just copy the structure directly.  Fix this.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230526184139.4.Iccee2d1ea19114dafb6553a854ea4d8ab2a3f25b@changeid
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-19 16:25:27 -07:00
Douglas Anderson
2711e4adef watchdog/hardlockup: don't use raw_cpu_ptr() in watchdog_hardlockup_kick()
In the patch ("watchdog/hardlockup: add a "cpu" param to
watchdog_hardlockup_check()") there was no reason to use raw_cpu_ptr(). 
Using this_cpu_ptr() works fine.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230526184139.3.I660e103077dcc23bb29aaf2be09cb234e0495b2d@changeid
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-19 16:25:27 -07:00
Douglas Anderson
6426e8d1f2 watchdog/hardlockup: HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG must implement watchdog_hardlockup_probe()
Right now there is one arch (sparc64) that selects HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG
without selecting HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH.  Because of that one
architecture, we have some special case code in the watchdog core to
handle the fact that watchdog_hardlockup_probe() isn't implemented.

Let's implement watchdog_hardlockup_probe() for sparc64 and get rid of the
special case.

As a side effect of doing this, code inspection tells us that we could fix
a minor bug where the system won't properly realize that NMI watchdogs are
disabled.  Specifically, on powerpc if CONFIG_PPC_WATCHDOG is turned off
the arch might still select CONFIG_HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH which
selects CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG.  Since CONFIG_PPC_WATCHDOG was off then
nothing will override the "weak" watchdog_hardlockup_probe() and we'll
fallback to looking at CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230526184139.2.Ic6ebbf307ca0efe91f08ce2c1eb4a037ba6b0700@changeid
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-19 16:25:26 -07:00
Douglas Anderson
9ec272c586 watchdog/hardlockup: keep kernel.nmi_watchdog sysctl as 0444 if probe fails
Patch series "watchdog: Cleanup / fixes after buddy series v5 reviews".

This patch series attempts to finish resolving the feedback received
from Petr Mladek on the v5 series I posted.

Probably the only thing that wasn't fully as clean as Petr requested was
the Kconfig stuff.  I couldn't find a better way to express it without a
more major overhaul.  In the very least, I renamed "NON_ARCH" to
"PERF_OR_BUDDY" in the hopes that will make it marginally better.

Nothing in this series is terribly critical and even the bugfixes are
small.  However, it does cleanup a few things that were pointed out in
review.


This patch (of 10):

The permissions for the kernel.nmi_watchdog sysctl have always been set at
compile time despite the fact that a watchdog can fail to probe.  Let's
fix this and set the permissions based on whether the hardlockup detector
actually probed.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230527014153.2793931-1-dianders@chromium.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230526184139.1.I0d75971cc52a7283f495aac0bd5c3041aadc734e@changeid
Fixes: a994a3147e ("watchdog/hardlockup/perf: Implement init time detection of perf")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reported-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZHCn4hNxFpY5-9Ki@alley
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-19 16:25:26 -07:00
Arnd Bergmann
a94181ec06 syscalls: add sys_ni_posix_timers prototype
The sys_ni_posix_timers() definition causes a warning when the declaration
is missing, so this needs to be added along with the normal syscalls,
outside of the #ifdef.

kernel/time/posix-stubs.c:26:17: error: no previous prototype for 'sys_ni_posix_timers' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230607142925.3126422-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:25 -07:00
Kees Cook
f26799ffd6 checkpatch: check for 0-length and 1-element arrays
Fake flexible arrays have been deprecated since last millennium.  Proper
C99 flexible arrays must be used throughout the kernel so
CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE and CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS can provide proper array
bounds checking.

[joe@perches.com: various suggestions]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230601160746.up.948-kees@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517204530.never.151-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:24 -07:00
Zhen Lei
16c6006af4 kexec: enable kexec_crash_size to support two crash kernel regions
The crashk_low_res should be considered by /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size
to support two crash kernel regions shrinking if existing.

While doing it, crashk_low_res will only be shrunk when the entire
crashk_res is empty; and if the crashk_res is empty and crahk_low_res
is not, change crashk_low_res to be crashk_res.

[bhe@redhat.com: redo changelog]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230527123439.772-7-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:24 -07:00
Zhen Lei
5b7bfb32cb kexec: add helper __crash_shrink_memory()
No functional change, in preparation for the next patch so that it is
easier to review.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: make  __crash_shrink_memory() static]
  Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202305280717.Pw06aLkz-lkp@intel.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230527123439.772-6-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:24 -07:00
Zhen Lei
8a7db7790a kexec: improve the readability of crash_shrink_memory()
The major adjustments are:
1. end = start + new_size.
   The 'end' here is not an accurate representation, because it is not the
   new end of crashk_res, but the start of ram_res, difference 1. So
   eliminate it and replace it with ram_res->start.
2. Use 'ram_res->start' and 'ram_res->end' as arguments to
   crash_free_reserved_phys_range() to indicate that the memory covered by
   'ram_res' is released from the crashk. And keep it close to
   insert_resource().
3. Replace 'if (start == end)' with 'if (!new_size)', clear indication that
   all crashk memory will be shrunken.

No functional change.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230527123439.772-5-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:24 -07:00
Zhen Lei
f7f567b95b kexec: clear crashk_res if all its memory has been released
If the resource of crashk_res has been released, it is better to clear
crashk_res.start and crashk_res.end.  Because 'end = start - 1' is not
reasonable, and in some places the test is based on crashk_res.end, not
resource_size(&crashk_res).

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230527123439.772-4-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:23 -07:00
Zhen Lei
6f22a744f4 kexec: delete a useless check in crash_shrink_memory()
The check '(crashk_res.parent != NULL)' is added by commit e05bd3367b
("kexec: fix Oops in crash_shrink_memory()"), but it's stale now.  Because
if 'crashk_res' is not reserved, it will be zero in size and will be
intercepted by the above 'if (new_size >= old_size)'.

Ago:
	if (new_size >= end - start + 1)

Now:
	old_size = (end == 0) ? 0 : end - start + 1;
	if (new_size >= old_size)

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230527123439.772-3-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:23 -07:00
Zhen Lei
1cba6c4309 kexec: fix a memory leak in crash_shrink_memory()
Patch series "kexec: enable kexec_crash_size to support two crash kernel
regions".

When crashkernel=X fails to reserve region under 4G, it will fall back to
reserve region above 4G and a region of the default size will also be
reserved under 4G.  Unfortunately, /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size only
supports one crash kernel region now, the user cannot sense the low memory
reserved by reading /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size.  Also, low memory cannot
be freed by writing this file.

For example:
resource_size(crashk_res) = 512M
resource_size(crashk_low_res) = 256M

The result of 'cat /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size' is 512M, but it should be
768M.  When we execute 'echo 0 > /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size', the size
of crashk_res becomes 0 and resource_size(crashk_low_res) is still 256 MB,
which is incorrect.

Since crashk_res manages the memory with high address and crashk_low_res
manages the memory with low address, crashk_low_res is shrunken only when
all crashk_res is shrunken.  And because when there is only one crash
kernel region, crashk_res is always used.  Therefore, if all crashk_res is
shrunken and crashk_low_res still exists, swap them.


This patch (of 6):

If the value of parameter 'new_size' is in the semi-open and semi-closed
interval (crashk_res.end - KEXEC_CRASH_MEM_ALIGN + 1, crashk_res.end], the
calculation result of ram_res is:

	ram_res->start = crashk_res.end + 1
	ram_res->end   = crashk_res.end

The operation of insert_resource() fails, and ram_res is not added to
iomem_resource.  As a result, the memory of the control block ram_res is
leaked.

In fact, on all architectures, the start address and size of crashk_res
are already aligned by KEXEC_CRASH_MEM_ALIGN.  Therefore, we do not need
to round up crashk_res.start again.  Instead, we should round up
'new_size' in advance.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230527123439.772-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230527123439.772-2-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
Fixes: 6480e5a092 ("kdump: add missing RAM resource in crash_shrink_memory()")
Fixes: 06a7f71124 ("kexec: premit reduction of the reserved memory size")
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:23 -07:00
Joseph Qi
69fe5c430c ocfs2: cleanup trace events
After commit 6dc8bc0fb3 ("ocfs2: switch to iter_file_splice_write()"),
ocfs2 has switched from ocfs2_file_splice_write() to
iter_file_splice_write(), so cleanup the corresponding trace event as
well.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230528132033.217664-2-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:23 -07:00
Joseph Qi
d32840ad4a ocfs2: correct return value of ocfs2_local_free_info()
Now in ocfs2_local_free_info(), it returns 0 even if it actually fails. 
Though it doesn't cause any real problem since the only caller
dquot_disable() ignores the return value, we'd better return correct as it
is.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230528132033.217664-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:22 -07:00
Simon Horman
4df3504e2f kexec: avoid calculating array size twice
Avoid calculating array size twice in kexec_purgatory_setup_sechdrs().
Once using array_size(), and once open-coded.

Flagged by Coccinelle:

  .../kexec_file.c:881:8-25: WARNING: array_size is already used (line 877) to compute the same size

No functional change intended.
Compile tested only.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230525-kexec-array_size-v1-1-8b4bf4f7500a@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:22 -07:00
Alexey Dobriyan
048a988326 include/linux/math.h: fix mult_frac() multiple argument evaluation bug
mult_frac() evaluates _all_ arguments multiple times in the body.

Clarify comment while I'm at it.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/f9f9fdbb-ec8e-4f5e-a998-2a58627a1a43@p183
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:22 -07:00
Douglas Anderson
d7a0fe9ef6 arm64: enable perf events based hard lockup detector
With the recent feature added to enable perf events to use pseudo NMIs as
interrupts on platforms which support GICv3 or later, its now been
possible to enable hard lockup detector (or NMI watchdog) on arm64
platforms.  So enable corresponding support.

One thing to note here is that normally lockup detector is initialized
just after the early initcalls but PMU on arm64 comes up much later as
device_initcall().  To cope with that, override
arch_perf_nmi_is_available() to let the watchdog framework know PMU not
ready, and inform the framework to re-initialize lockup detection once PMU
has been initialized.

[dianders@chromium.org: only HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF if the PMU config is enabled]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230523073952.1.I60217a63acc35621e13f10be16c0cd7c363caf8c@changeid
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230519101840.v5.18.Ia44852044cdcb074f387e80df6b45e892965d4a1@changeid
Co-developed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Co-developed-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@chromium.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:22 -07:00
Lecopzer Chen
94946f9eaa arm64: add hw_nmi_get_sample_period for preparation of lockup detector
Set safe maximum CPU frequency to 5 GHz in case a particular platform
doesn't implement cpufreq driver.  Although, architecture doesn't put any
restrictions on maximum frequency but 5 GHz seems to be safe maximum given
the available Arm CPUs in the market which are clocked much less than 5
GHz.

On the other hand, we can't make it much higher as it would lead to a
large hard-lockup detection timeout on parts which are running slower (eg.
1GHz on Developerbox) and doesn't possess a cpufreq driver.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230519101840.v5.17.Ia9d02578e89c3f44d3cb12eec8b0176603c8ab2f@changeid
Co-developed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Co-developed-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@chromium.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:21 -07:00
Lecopzer Chen
930d8f8dba watchdog/perf: adapt the watchdog_perf interface for async model
When lockup_detector_init()->watchdog_hardlockup_probe(), PMU may be not
ready yet.  E.g.  on arm64, PMU is not ready until
device_initcall(armv8_pmu_driver_init).  And it is deeply integrated with
the driver model and cpuhp.  Hence it is hard to push this initialization
before smp_init().

But it is easy to take an opposite approach and try to initialize the
watchdog once again later.  The delayed probe is called using workqueues. 
It need to allocate memory and must be proceed in a normal context.  The
delayed probe is able to use if watchdog_hardlockup_probe() returns
non-zero which means the return code returned when PMU is not ready yet.

Provide an API - lockup_detector_retry_init() for anyone who needs to
delayed init lockup detector if they had ever failed at
lockup_detector_init().

The original assumption is: nobody should use delayed probe after
lockup_detector_check() which has __init attribute.  That is, anyone uses
this API must call between lockup_detector_init() and
lockup_detector_check(), and the caller must have __init attribute

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230519101840.v5.16.If4ad5dd5d09fb1309cebf8bcead4b6a5a7758ca7@changeid
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Co-developed-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Cc: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@chromium.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:21 -07:00
Douglas Anderson
b17aa95933 watchdog/perf: add a weak function for an arch to detect if perf can use NMIs
On arm64, NMI support needs to be detected at runtime.  Add a weak
function to the perf hardlockup detector so that an architecture can
implement it to detect whether NMIs are available.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230519101840.v5.15.Ic55cb6f90ef5967d8aaa2b503a4e67c753f64d3a@changeid
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Cc: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@chromium.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:21 -07:00