Our interrupt handler (in hardirq context) could race with the timer
(in softirq context), hence we need to hold the spinlock around the
call to ->hdp_irq_setup in intel_hpd_irq_handler, too.
But as an optimization (and more so to clarify things) we don't need
to do the irqsave/restore dance in the hardirq context.
Note also that on ilk+ the race isn't just against the hotplug
reenable timer, but also against the fifo underrun reporting. That one
also modifies the SDEIMR register (again protected by the same
dev_priv->irq_lock).
To lock things down again sprinkle a assert_spin_locked. But exclude
the functions touching SDEIMR for now, I want to extract them all into
a new helper function (like we do already for pipestate, display
interrupts and all the various gt interrupts).
v2: Add the missing 't' Egbert spotted in a comment.
v3: Actually fix the right misspelled comment (Paulo).
Cc: Egbert Eich <eich@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Daniel Vetter
b5ea2d5681