Xfstests btrfs/011 complains about a deadlock warning,
[ 1226.649039] =========================================================
[ 1226.649039] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
[ 1226.649039] 4.1.0+ #270 Not tainted
[ 1226.649039] ---------------------------------------------------------
[ 1226.652955] kswapd0/46 just changed the state of lock:
[ 1226.652955] (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
[ 1226.652955] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past:
[ 1226.652955] (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.}
and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
[ 1226.652955]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1226.652955] Chain exists of:
&delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock
[ 1226.652955] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[ 1226.652955] CPU0 CPU1
[ 1226.652955] ---- ----
[ 1226.652955] lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock);
[ 1226.652955] local_irq_disable();
[ 1226.652955] lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
[ 1226.652955] lock(&found->groups_sem);
[ 1226.652955] <Interrupt>
[ 1226.652955] lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
[ 1226.652955]
*** DEADLOCK ***
Commit 084b6e7c76 ("btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest.") tried
to fix a similar one that has the exactly same warning, but with that, we still
run to this.
The above lock chain comes from
btrfs_commit_transaction
->btrfs_run_delayed_items
...
->__btrfs_update_delayed_inode
...
->__btrfs_cow_block
...
->find_free_extent
->cache_block_group
->load_free_space_cache
->btrfs_readpages
->submit_one_bio
...
->__btrfs_map_block
->btrfs_dev_replace_lock
However, with high memory pressure, tasks which hold dev_replace.lock can
be interrupted by kswapd and then kswapd is intended to release memory occupied
by superblock, inodes and dentries, where we may call evict_inode, and it comes
to
[ 1226.652955] [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
[ 1226.652955] [<ffffffff81459e74>] btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x24/0x30
[ 1226.652955] [<ffffffff8140c5fe>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x34e/0x700
delayed_node->mutex may be acquired in __btrfs_release_delayed_node(), and it leads
to a ABBA deadlock.
To fix this, we can use "blocking rwlock" used in the case of extent_buffer, but
things are simpler here since we only needs read's spinlock to blocking lock.
With this, btrfs/011 no more produces warnings in dmesg.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
With CONFIG_SMP and CONFIG_PREEMPT both disabled, gcc decides
to partially inline the get_state_failrec() function but cannot
figure out that means the failrec pointer is always valid
if the function returns success, which causes a harmless
warning:
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: In function 'clean_io_failure':
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2131:4: error: 'failrec' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
This marks get_state_failrec() and set_state_failrec() both
as 'noinline', which avoids the warning in all cases for me,
and seems less ugly than adding a fake initialization.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 47dc196ae7 ("btrfs: use proper type for failrec in extent_state")
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cleanup.
kmem_cache_destroy has support NULL argument checking,
so drop the double null testing before calling it.
Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We were getting build warning about:
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:7021:34: warning: ‘used_bg’ may be used
uninitialized in this function
It is not a valid warning as used_bg is never used uninitilized since
locked is initially false so we can never be in the section where
'used_bg' is used. But gcc is not able to understand that and we can
initialize it while declaring to silence the warning.
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The kernel provides a swap() that does the same thing as this code.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <dsj@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
While running btrfs_mksubvol(), d_really_is_positive() is called twice.
First in btrfs_mksubvol() and second inside btrfs_may_create(). So I
remove the first one.
Signed-off-by: Byongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We will sometimes start background flushing the various enospc related things
(delayed nodes, delalloc, etc) if we are getting close to reserving all of our
available space. We don't want to do this however when we are actually using
this space as it causes unneeded thrashing. We currently try to do this by
checking bytes_used >= thresh, but bytes_used is only part of the equation, we
need to use bytes_reserved as well as this represents space that is very likely
to become bytes_used in the future.
My tracing tool will keep count of the number of times we kick off the async
flusher, the following are counts for the entire run of generic/027
No Patch Patch
avg: 5385 5009
median: 5500 4916
We skewed lower than the average with my patch and higher than the average with
the patch, overall it cuts the flushing from anywhere from 5-10%, which in the
case of actual ENOSPC is quite helpful. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are a few places where we add to trans->bytes_reserved but don't have the
corresponding trace point. With these added my tool no longer sees transaction
leaks.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
truncate_space_check is using btrfs_csum_bytes_to_leaves() but forgetting to
multiply by nodesize so we get an actual byte count. We need a tracepoint here
so that we have the matching reserve for the release that will come later. Also
add a comment to make clear what the intent of truncate_space_check is.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
I'm writing a tool to visualize the enospc system in order to help debug enospc
bugs and I found weird data and ran it down to when we update the global block
rsv. We add all of the remaining free space to the block rsv, do a trace event,
then remove the extra and do another trace event. This makes my visualization
look silly and is unintuitive code as well. Fix this stuff to only add the
amount we are missing, or free the amount we are missing. This is less clean to
read but more explicit in what it is doing, as well as only emitting events for
values that make sense. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For a non-existent device, old code bypasses adding it in dev's reada
queue.
And to solve problem of unfinished waitting in raid5/6,
commit 5fbc7c59fd ("Btrfs: fix unfinished readahead thread for
raid5/6 degraded mounting")
adding an exception for the first stripe, in short, the first
stripe will always be processed whether the device exists or not.
Actually we have a better way for the above request: just bypass
creation of the reada_extent for non-existent device, it will make
code simple and effective.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reada background works is not designed to finish all jobs
completely, it will break in following case:
1: When a device reaches workload limit (MAX_IN_FLIGHT)
2: Total reads reach max limit (10000)
3: All devices don't have queued more jobs, often happened in DUP case
And if all background works exit with remaining jobs,
btrfs_reada_wait() will wait indefinetelly.
Above problem is rarely happened in old code, because:
1: Every work queues 2x new works
So many works reduced chances of undone jobs.
2: One work will continue 10000 times loop in case of no-jobs
It reduced no-thread window time.
But after we fixed above case, the "undone reada extents" frequently
happened.
Fix:
Check to ensure we have at least one thread if there are undone jobs
in btrfs_reada_wait().
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reada creates 2 works for each level of tree recursively.
In case of a tree having many levels, the number of created works
is 2^level_of_tree.
Actually we don't need so many works in parallel, this patch limits
max works to BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORS * 2.
The per-fs works_counter will be also used for btrfs_reada_wait() to
check is there are background workers.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
No need to decrease dev->reada_in_flight in __readahead_hook()'s
internal and reada_extent_put().
reada_extent_put() have no chance to decrease dev->reada_in_flight
in free operation, because reada_extent have additional refcnt when
scheduled to a dev.
We can put inc and dec operation for dev->reada_in_flight to one
place instead to make logic simple and safe, and move useless
reada_extent->scheduled_for to a bool flag instead.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
David Sterba
Liu Bo
Arnd Bergmann
Kinglong Mee
Sudip Mukherjee
Deepa Dinamani
Dave Jones
Byongho Lee
Josef Bacik
Zhao Lei