With the new btree_map() functions, we don't need to export the stuff
needed for traversing the btree anymore.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Lots of stuff has been open coding its own btree traversal - which is
generally pretty simple code, but there are a few subtleties.
This adds new new functions, bch_btree_map_nodes() and
bch_btree_map_keys(), which do the traversal for you. Everything that's
open coding btree traversal now (with the exception of garbage
collection) is slowly going to be converted to these two functions;
being able to write other code at a higher level of abstraction is a
big improvement w.r.t. overall code quality.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
This simplifies the writeback flow control quite a bit - previously, it
was conceptually two coroutines, refill_dirty() and read_dirty(). This
makes the code quite a bit more straightforward.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
We needed a dedicated rescuer workqueue for gc anyways... and gc was
conceptually a dedicated thread, just one that wasn't running all the
time. Switch it to a dedicated thread to make the code a bit more
straightforward.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
At one point we did do fancy asynchronous waiting stuff with
bucket_wait, but that's all gone (and bucket_wait is used a lot less
than it used to be). So use the standard primitives.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Slowly working on pruning struct btree_op - the aim is for it to only
contain things that are actually necessary for traversing the btree.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Making things less asynchronous that don't need to be - bch_journal()
only has to block when the journal or journal entry is full, which is
emphatically not a fast path. So make it a normal function that just
returns when it finishes, to make the code and control flow easier to
follow.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Try to improve some of the naming a bit to be more consistent, and also
improve the flow of control in request_write() a bit.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Some refactoring - better to explicitly pass stuff around instead of
having it all in the "big bag of state", struct btree_op. Going to prune
struct btree_op quite a bit over time.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
This was the main point of all this refactoring - now,
btree_insert_check_key() won't fail just because the leaf node happened
to be full.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
We'll often end up with a list of adjacent keys to insert -
because bch_data_insert() may have to fragment the data it writes.
Originally, to simplify things and avoid having to deal with corner
cases bch_btree_insert() would pass keys from this list one at a time to
btree_insert_recurse() - mainly because the list of keys might span leaf
nodes, so it was easier this way.
With the btree_insert_node() refactoring, it's now a lot easier to just
pass down the whole list and have btree_insert_recurse() iterate over
leaf nodes until it's done.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
The flow of control in the old btree insertion code was rather -
backwards; we'd recurse down the btree (in btree_insert_recurse()), and
then if we needed to split the keys to be inserted into the parent node
would be effectively returned up to btree_insert_recurse(), which would
notice there was more work to do and finish the insertion.
The main problem with this was that the full logic for btree insertion
could only be used by calling btree_insert_recurse; if you'd gotten to a
btree leaf some other way and had a key to insert, if it turned out that
node needed to be split you were SOL.
This inverts the flow of control so btree_insert_node() does _full_
btree insertion, including splitting - and takes a (leaf) btree node to
insert into as a parameter.
This means we can now _correctly_ handle cache misses - for cache
misses, we need to insert a fake "check" key into the btree when we
discover we have a cache miss - while we still have the btree locked.
Previously, if the btree node was full inserting a cache miss would just
fail.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
This is prep work for the reworked btree insertion code.
The way we set b->parent is ugly and hacky... the problem is, when
btree_split() or garbage collection splits or rewrites a btree node, the
parent changes for all its (potentially already cached) children.
I may change this later and add some code to look through the btree node
cache and find all our cached child nodes and change the parent pointer
then...
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Checking i->seq was redundant, because since ages ago we always
initialize the new bset when advancing b->written
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Originally I got this right... except that the divides didn't use
do_div(), which broke 32 bit kernels. When I went to fix that, I forgot
that the raid stripe size usually isn't a power of two... doh
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
The old asynchronous discard code was really a relic from when all the
allocation code was asynchronous - now that allocation runs out of a
dedicated thread there's no point in keeping around all that complicated
machinery.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
bch_keybuf_del() takes a spinlock that can't be taken in interrupt context -
whoops. Fortunately, this code isn't enabled by default (you have to toggle a
sysfs thing).
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Dirty data accounting wasn't quite right - firstly, we were adding the key we're
inserting after it could have merged with another dirty key already in the
btree, and secondly we could sometimes pass the wrong offset to
bcache_dev_sectors_dirty_add() for dirty data we were overwriting - which is
important when tracking dirty data by stripe.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # >= v3.10
The options have to be passed space-separated and prefixed by "floppy=",
rather than separately and unprefixed.
This fixes <http://bugs.debian.org/726655>.
Signed-off-by: Ben Harris <bjh21@cam.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
My static checker complains correctly that this is potential NULL
dereference because debugfs functions return NULL on error. They return
an ERR_PTR if they are configured out.
We don't need to check for ERR_PTR because if debugfs is stubbed out the
dummy functions won't complain about that. We don't need to check the
values before calling debugfs_remove() because that accepts ERR_PTRs and
NULL pointers.
We don't need to set pkt->dfs_f_info to NULL in pkt_debugfs_dev_new()
because it was initialized with kzalloc() so I have removed that.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Kent Overstreet
Ben Harris
Dan Carpenter