tilegx_defconfig:
fs/btrfs/raid56.c: In function 'btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table':
fs/btrfs/raid56.c:206:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'vzalloc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
fs/btrfs/raid56.c:206:9: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default]
fs/btrfs/raid56.c:226:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfree' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
We want to avoid module.h where posible, since it in turn includes
nearly all of header space. This means removing it where it is not
required, and using export.h where we are only exporting symbols via
EXPORT_SYMBOL and friends.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Apparently when we do inline extents we allow the data to overlap the last chunk
of the btrfs_file_extent_item, which means that we can possibly have a
btrfs_file_extent_item that isn't actually as large as a btrfs_file_extent_item.
This messes with us when we try to overwrite the extent when logging new extents
since we expect for it to be the right size. To fix this just delete the item
and try to do the insert again which will give us the proper sized
btrfs_file_extent_item. This fixes a panic where map_private_extent_buffer
would blow up because we're trying to write past the end of the leaf. Thanks,
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
The stripe hash table is large, starting with allocation order 4 and can go as
high as order 7 in case lock debugging is turned on and structure padding
happens.
Observed mount failure:
mount: page allocation failure: order:7, mode:0x200050
Pid: 8234, comm: mount Tainted: G W 3.8.0-default+ #267
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81114353>] warn_alloc_failed+0xf3/0x140
[<ffffffff811171d2>] ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0x92/0x250
[<ffffffff81117ac3>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x733/0x9d0
[<ffffffff81152878>] ? cache_alloc_refill+0x3f8/0x840
[<ffffffff811528bc>] cache_alloc_refill+0x43c/0x840
[<ffffffff811302eb>] ? is_kernel_percpu_address+0x4b/0x90
[<ffffffffa00a00ac>] ? btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table+0x5c/0x130 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff811531d7>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x247/0x270
[<ffffffffa00a00ac>] btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table+0x5c/0x130 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa003133f>] open_ctree+0xb2f/0x1f90 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff81397289>] ? string+0x49/0xe0
[<ffffffff813987b3>] ? vsnprintf+0x443/0x5d0
[<ffffffffa0007cb6>] btrfs_mount+0x526/0x600 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff8115127c>] ? cache_alloc_debugcheck_after+0x4c/0x200
[<ffffffff81162b90>] mount_fs+0x20/0xe0
[<ffffffff8117db26>] vfs_kern_mount+0x76/0x120
[<ffffffff811801b6>] do_mount+0x386/0x980
[<ffffffff8112a5cb>] ? strndup_user+0x5b/0x80
[<ffffffff81180840>] sys_mount+0x90/0xe0
[<ffffffff81962e99>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
The original code is a little confusing and not clear, The right
way to deal with the kernel code like this:
[...]
if (ret)
goto out;
[...]
So i move the common clean_up code to the place labeled with
out_fail, this will be easier to maintain.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
commit eb6b88d92c leads into another bug.
If it is just because qgroup_reserve fails, the function btrfs_qgroup_free
should not be called, otherwise, it will cause the wrong quota accounting.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
The check work has been done just before the function btrfs_clean_quota_tree
is called, it is not necessary to check it again, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Steps to reproduce:
i=0
ncases=100
mkfs.btrfs <disk>
mount <disk> <mnt>
btrfs quota enable <mnt>
btrfs qgroup create 2/1 <mnt>
while [ $i -le $ncases ]
do
btrfs qgroup create 1/$i <mnt>
btrfs qgroup assign 1/$i 2/1 <mnt>
i=$(($i+1))
done
btrfs quota disable <mnt>
umount <mnt>
btrfsck <mnt>
You can also use the commands:
btrfs-debug-tree <disk> | grep QGROUP
You will find there are still items existed.The reasons why this happens
is because the original code just checks slots[0]==0 and returns.
We try to fix it by deleting the leaf one by one.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
The nodesize is capped at 64k and there are enough pages preallocated in
extent_buffer::inline_pages. The fallback to kmalloc never happened
because even on the smallest page size considered (4k) inline_pages
covered the needs.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
When deleting a snapshot/subvolume, we need remove root ref/backref,
dir entries and update the dir inode, so we must reserve free space
for those operations.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
There are two problems in the space reservation of the snapshot/
subvolume creation.
- don't reserve the space for the root item insertion
- the space which is reserved in the qgroup is different with
the free space reservation. we need reserve free space for
7 items, but in qgroup reservation, we need reserve space only
for 3 items.
So we implement new metadata reservation functions for the
snapshot/subvolume creation.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Since we have grabbed the parent inode at the beginning of the
snapshot creation, and both sync and async snapshot creation
release it after the pending snapshots are actually created,
it is safe to access the parent inode directly during the snapshot
creation, we needn't use dget_parent/dput to fix the parent dentry
and get the dir inode.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Dave pointed out that he saw messages from btrfs although there was no
such filesystem on his computers. The automatic device scan is called on
every new blockdevice if the usual distro udev rule set is used. The
printk introduced in 6f60cbd3ae was a remainder from copying
portions of code from btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb which is used under
different conditions and the warning makes sense there.
Reported-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
While doing cleanup work on an aborted transaction, we've set
the global running transaction pointer to NULL _before_ waiting all
other transaction handles to finish, so others'd hit NULL pointer
crash when referencing the global running transaction pointer.
This first sets a hint to avoid new transaction handle joining, then
waits other existing handles to abort or finish so that we can safely
set the above global pointer to NULL.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
When we abort a transaction while fsyncing, we'll skip freeing log roots
part of committing a transaction, which leads to memory leak.
This adds a 'free log roots' in putting super when no more users hold
references on log roots, so it's safe and clean.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
I noticed while looking into a tree logging bug that we aren't logging inline
extents properly. Since this requires copying and it shouldn't happen too often
just force us to copy everything for the inode into the tree log when we have an
inline extent. With this patch we have valid data after a crash when we write
an inline extent. Thanks,
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Though most of the btrfs codes are using ALIGN macro for page alignment,
there are still some codes using open-coded alignment like the
following:
------
u64 mask = ((u64)root->stripesize - 1);
u64 ret = (val + mask) & ~mask;
------
Or even hidden one:
------
num_bytes = (end - start + blocksize) & ~(blocksize - 1);
------
Sometimes these open-coded alignment is not so easy to understand for
newbie like me.
This commit changes the open-coded alignment to the ALIGN macro for a
better readability.
Also there is a previous patch from David Sterba with similar changes,
but the patch is for 3.2 kernel and seems not merged.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg12747.html
Cc: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Before we forced to change a file's NOCOW and COMPRESS flag due to
the parent directory's, but this ends up a bad idea, because it
confuses end users a lot about file's NOCOW status, eg. if someone
change a file to NOCOW via 'chattr' and then rename it in the current
directory which is without NOCOW attribute, the file will lose the
NOCOW flag silently.
This diables 'change flags in rename', so from now on we'll only
inherit flags from the parent directory on creation stage while in
other places we can use 'chattr' to set NOCOW or COMPRESS flags.
Reported-by: Marios Titas <redneb8888@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
While inserting dir index and updating inode for a snapshot, we'd
add delayed items which consume trans->block_rsv, if we don't have
any space reserved in this trans handle, we either just return or
reserve space again.
But before creating pending snapshots during committing transaction,
we've done a release on this trans handle, so we don't have space reserved
in it at this stage.
What we're using is block_rsv of pending snapshots which has already
reserved well enough space for both inserting dir index and updating
inode, so we need to set trans handle to indicate that we have space
now.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
I've experienced filesystem freezes with permanent spikes in the active
process count for quite a while, particularly on filesystems whose
available raw space has already been fully allocated to chunks.
While looking into this, I found a pretty obvious error in
do_chunk_alloc: it sets space_info->chunk_alloc, but if
btrfs_alloc_chunk returns an error other than ENOSPC, it returns leaving
that flag set, which causes any other threads waiting for
space_info->chunk_alloc to become zero to spin indefinitely.
I haven't double-checked that this patch fixes the failure I've observed
fully (it's not exactly trivial to trigger), but it surely is a bug and
the fix is trivial, so... Please put it in :-)
What I saw in that function also happens to explain why in some cases I
see filesystems allocate a huge number of chunks that remain unused
(leading to the scenario above, of not having more chunks to allocate).
It happens for data and metadata, but not necessarily both. I'm
guessing some thread sets the force_alloc flag on the corresponding
space_info, and then several threads trying to get disk space end up
attempting to allocate a new chunk concurrently. All of them will see
the force_alloc flag and bump their local copy of force up to the level
they see first, and they won't clear it even if another thread succeeds
in allocating a chunk, thus clearing the force flag. Then each thread
that observed the force flag will, on its turn, force the allocation of
a new chunk. And any threads that come in while it does that will see
the force flag still set and pick it up, and so on. This sounds like a
problem to me, but... what should the correct behavior be? Clear
force_flag once we copy it to a local force? Reset force to the
incoming value on every loop? Set the flag to our incoming force if we
have it at first, clear our local flag, and move it from the space_info
when we determined that we are the thread that's going to perform the
allocation?
btrfs: clear chunk_alloc flag on retryable failure
From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
If btrfs_alloc_chunk fails with e.g. ENOMEM, we exit do_chunk_alloc
without clearing chunk_alloc in space_info. As a result, any further
calls to do_chunk_alloc on that filesystem will start busy-waiting for
chunk_alloc to be cleared, but it never will be. This patch adjusts
do_chunk_alloc so that it clears this flag in case of an error.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
When a subvolume is removed, we remove the root item from the root tree,
while the tree blocks and backrefs remain for a while. When backref walking
comes across one of those orphan tree blocks, it can find a backref for a
no longer existing root. This is all good, we only must tolerate
__resolve_indirect_ref returning an error and continue with the good refs
found.
Reported-by: Alex Lyakas <alex.btrfs@zadarastorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
A user reported hitting the BUG_ON() in btrfs_finished_ordered_io() where we had
csums on a NOCOW extent. This can happen if we have NODATACOW set but not
NODATASUM set, which can happen in two cases, either we mount with -o nodatacow
and then write into preallocated space, or chattr +C a directory and move a file
into that directory. Liu has fixed the move case in a different place, but this
fixes the mount -o nodatacow case. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
If we remount the fs to close the auto defragment or make the fs R/O,
we should stop the auto defragment.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
When running the 083th case of xfstests on the filesystem with
"compress-force=lzo", the following WARNINGs were triggered.
WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:7908
WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:7909
WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:7911
WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4510
WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4511
This problem was introduced by the patch "Btrfs: fix deadlock due
to unsubmitted". In this patch, there are two bugs which caused
the above problem.
The 1st one is a off-by-one bug, if the DIO write return 0, it is
also a short write, we need release the reserved space for it. But
we didn't do it in that patch. Fix it by change "ret > 0" to
"ret >= 0".
The 2nd one is ->outstanding_extents was increased twice when
a short write happened. As we know, ->outstanding_extents is
a counter to keep track of the number of extent items we may
use duo to delalloc, when we reserve the free space for a
delalloc write, we assume that the write will introduce just
one extent item, so we increase ->outstanding_extents by 1 at
that time. And then we will increase it every time we split the
write, it is done at the beginning of btrfs_get_blocks_direct().
So when a short write happens, we needn't increase
->outstanding_extents again. But this patch done.
In order to fix the 2nd problem, I re-write the logic for
->outstanding_extents operation. We don't increase it at the
beginning of btrfs_get_blocks_direct(), instead, we just
increase it when the split actually happens.
Reported-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Geert Uytterhoeven
Paul Gortmaker
Josef Bacik
David Sterba
Wang Shilong
Miao Xie
Liu Bo
Qu Wenruo
Alexandre Oliva
Jan Schmidt