We've been ignoring read-only mappings and programming everything
into the iommu as read-write. Fix this to only include the write
access flag when read-only is not set.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Memory slot flags can be altered without changing other parameters of
the slot. The read-only attribute is the only one the IOMMU cares
about, so generate an un-map, re-map when this occurs. This also
avoid unnecessarily re-mapping the slot when no IOMMU visible changes
are made.
Reviewed-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
'pushq' doesn't exist on i386. Replace with 'push', which should work
since the operand is a register.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
If emulate_invalid_guest_state=false vmx->emulation_required is never
actually used, but it ends up to be always set to true since
handle_invalid_guest_state(), the only place it is reset back to
false, is never called. This, besides been not very clean, makes vmexit
and vmentry path to check emulate_invalid_guest_state needlessly.
The patch fixes that by keeping emulation_required coherent with
emulate_invalid_guest_state setting.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
If VMX reports segment as unusable, zero descriptor passed by the emulator
before returning. Such descriptor will be considered not present by the
emulator.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Usability is returned in unusable field, so not need to clobber entire
AR. Callers have to know how to deal with unusable segments already
since if emulate_invalid_guest_state=true AR is not zeroed.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
vmx->rmode.vm86_active is never true is unrestricted guest is enabled.
Make it more explicit that neither enter_pmode() nor enter_rmode() is
called in this case.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
There is no reason for it. If state is suitable for vmentry it
will be detected during guest entry and no emulation will happen.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Since vmx_get_cpl() always returns 0 when VCPU is in real mode it is no
longer needed. Also reset CPL cache to zero during transaction to
protected mode since transaction may happen while CS.selectors & 3 != 0,
but in reality CPL is 0.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
This is a bit of a special case since we don't have the usual
byte/word/long/quad switch; instead we switch on the condition code embedded
in the instruction.
Reviewed-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
The current reexecute_instruction can not well detect the failed instruction
emulation. It allows guest to retry all the instructions except it accesses
on error pfn
For example, some cases are nested-write-protect - if the page we want to
write is used as PDE but it chains to itself. Under this case, we should
stop the emulation and report the case to userspace
Reviewed-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Currently, reexecute_instruction refused to retry all instructions if
tdp is enabled. If nested npt is used, the emulation may be caused by
shadow page, it can be fixed by dropping the shadow page. And the only
condition that tdp can not retry the instruction is the access fault
on error pfn
Reviewed-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
One such variable, slot, is enough for holding a pointer temporarily.
We also remove another local variable named slot, which is limited in
a block, since it is confusing to have the same name in this function.
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>