Lockdep complains about btrfs's async commit:
[ 2372.462171] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
[ 2372.462191] 3.12.0+ #32 Tainted: G W
[ 2372.462209] -------------------------------------
[ 2372.462228] ceph-osd/14048 is trying to release lock (sb_internal) at:
[ 2372.462275] [<ffffffffa022cb10>] btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1b0/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 2372.462305] but there are no more locks to release!
[ 2372.462324]
[ 2372.462324] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 2372.462349] no locks held by ceph-osd/14048.
[ 2372.462367]
[ 2372.462367] stack backtrace:
[ 2372.462386] CPU: 2 PID: 14048 Comm: ceph-osd Tainted: G W 3.12.0+ #32
[ 2372.462414] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./To be filled by O.E.M., BIOS 080015 11/09/2011
[ 2372.462455] ffffffffa022cb10 ffff88007490fd28 ffffffff816f094a ffff8800378aa320
[ 2372.462491] ffff88007490fd50 ffffffff810adf4c ffff8800378aa320 ffff88009af97650
[ 2372.462526] ffffffffa022cb10 ffff88007490fd88 ffffffff810b01ee ffff8800898c0000
[ 2372.462562] Call Trace:
[ 2372.462584] [<ffffffffa022cb10>] ? btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1b0/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 2372.462619] [<ffffffff816f094a>] dump_stack+0x45/0x56
[ 2372.462642] [<ffffffff810adf4c>] print_unlock_imbalance_bug+0xec/0x100
[ 2372.462677] [<ffffffffa022cb10>] ? btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1b0/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 2372.462710] [<ffffffff810b01ee>] lock_release+0x18e/0x210
[ 2372.462742] [<ffffffffa022cb36>] btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1d6/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 2372.462783] [<ffffffffa025a7ce>] btrfs_ioctl_start_sync+0x3e/0xc0 [btrfs]
[ 2372.462822] [<ffffffffa025f1d3>] btrfs_ioctl+0x4c3/0x1f70 [btrfs]
[ 2372.462849] [<ffffffff812c0321>] ? avc_has_perm+0x121/0x1b0
[ 2372.462873] [<ffffffff812c0224>] ? avc_has_perm+0x24/0x1b0
[ 2372.462897] [<ffffffff8107ecc8>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xa8/0x100
[ 2372.462922] [<ffffffff8117b145>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2e5/0x4e0
[ 2372.462946] [<ffffffff812c19e6>] ? file_has_perm+0x86/0xa0
[ 2372.462969] [<ffffffff8117b3c1>] SyS_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
[ 2372.462991] [<ffffffff817045a4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
====================================================
It's because that we don't do the right thing when checking if it's ok to
tell lockdep that we're trying to release the rwsem.
If the trans handle's type is TRANS_ATTACH, we won't acquire the freeze rwsem, but
as TRANS_ATTACH fits the check (trans < TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK), we'll release the freeze
rwsem, which makes lockdep complains a lot.
Reported-by: Ma Jianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The 'git blame' history shows that, the old transaction commit code has to do
twice to ensure roots are updated and we have to flush metadata and super block
manually, however, right now all of these can be handled well inside
the transaction commit code without extra efforts.
And the error handling part remains same with the current code, -- 'return to
caller once we get error'.
This saves us a transaction commit and a flush of super block, which are both
heavy operations according to ftrace output analysis.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
__btrfs_start_workers returns 0 in case it raced with
btrfs_stop_workers and lost the race. This is wrong because worker in
this case is not allowed to start and is in fact destroyed. Return
-EINVAL instead.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Currently if we discover an error when scrubbing in ro mode we a)
blindly increment the uncorrectable_errors counter, and b) spam the
dmesg with the 'unable to fixup (regular) error at ...' message, even
though a) we haven't tried to determine if the error is correctable or
not, and b) we haven't tried to fixup anything. Fix this.
Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
If we fsync, seek and write, rename and then fsync again we will lose the
modified hole extent because the rename will drop all of the modified extents
since we didn't do the fast search. We need to only drop the modified extents
if we didn't do the fast search and we were logging the entire inode as we don't
need them anymore, otherwise this is being premature. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
If we rename a file that is already in the log and we fsync again we will lose
the new name. This is because we just log the inode update and not the new ref.
To fix this we just need to check if we are logging the new name of the inode
and copy all the metadata instead of just updating the inode itself. With this
patch my testcase now passes. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
We can just return false for this so we stop doing the snapshot aware defrag
stuff. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Heiko Carstens noticed that btrfs was using empty_zero_page
incorrectly. He explained:
The definition of empty_zero_page is architecture specific. It
is (currently) either a character array, an unsigned long
containing the address of the empty_zero_page, or even worse
only the address of the struct page belonging to the
empty_zero_page.
This commit changes btrfs to use a for-loop instead. On x86
the resulting .ko is smaller, and we're no longer worrying about
how each arch builds its zeros.
Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
rename the function -- btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes(), and make its
name be compatible to btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(), since they are always
used at the same place.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
It is very likely that there are lots of ordered extents in the filesytem,
if we wait for the completion of all of them when we want to reclaim some
space for the metadata space reservation, we would be blocked for a long
time. The performance would drop down suddenly for a long time.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
It was very likely that there were lots of async delalloc pages in the
filesystem, if we waited until all the pages were flushed, we would be
blocked for a long time, and the performance would also drop down.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
In shrink_delalloc(), what we need reclaim is the metadata space, so
flushing pages by to_reclaim is not reasonable, it is very likely that
the pages we flush are not enough. And then we had to invoke the flush
function for several times, at the worst, we need call flush_space for
several times. It wasted time.
We improve this problem by converting the metadata space size we need
reserve to the delalloc bytes, By this way, we can flush the pages
by a reasonable number.
(Now we use a fixed number to do conversion, it is not flexible, maybe
we can find a good way to improve it in the future.)
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This patch picked up the code that was used to calculate the number of
the items for which we need reserve space, and we will use it in the next
patch.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
We only allocate scrub workers if we pass all the necessary
checks, for example, there are no operation in progress.
Besides, move mutex lock protection outside of scrub_workers_get()
/scrub_workers_put().
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
I hit this problem with my no holes patch and it made me realize what the
problem was for bz 60834. If the first item in the leaf is an inline extent and
we try to read anything starting from disk_bytenr onward we will read off the
end of the leaf. So we need to check to see what it's type is, and if it's not
REG we can just break out. This should fix this problem. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The function write_ctree_super() in disk-io.c uses variable ret to return
the result of function write_all_supers(). Since, this variable serves
no purpose, hence the patch removes it and returns the call of the
called function.
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Replace kmalloc(size * nr, ) with kmalloc_array(nr, size), thus making
it easier to check is that the calculation doesn't wrap or return a smaller allocation
Signed-off-by: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1) for cleaner source
code that outputs a more descriptive warnings. Also fix the styling
warning of redundant braces that came up as a result of this fix.
Signed-off-by: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo
Ilya Dryomov
Josef Bacik
Al Viro
Chris Mason
Miao Xie
Wang Shilong
Rashika
Dulshani Gunawardhana