Otherwise our initial behaviour is "randomly save a bogus PLL
choice" as far as I can see.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We now refuse to load on gen6+ if kms is not enabled:
commit 26394d9251
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Mon Mar 26 21:33:18 2012 +0200
drm/i915: refuse to load on gen6+ without kms
Which results in the drm core calling our lastclose function to clean
up the mess, but that one is neatly broken for such failure cases
since kms has been introduced in
commit 79e539453b
Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Fri Nov 7 14:24:08 2008 -0800
DRM: i915: add mode setting support
Reported-and-tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Fixes failures in transform feedback on gen7 because our SOL_RESET
flag was setting the transform feedback offsets in the old context
(occasionally happened to be ours) instead of the new context.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
LVDS is the first output where dpms on/off and prepare/commit don't
perfectly match. Now the idea behind this special case seems to be
that for simple resolution changes on the LVDS we don't need to stop
the pipe, because (at least on newer chips) we can adjust the panel
fitter on the fly.
There are a few problems with the current code though:
- We still stop and restart the pipe unconditionally, because the crtc
helper code isn't flexible enough.
- We show some ugly flickering, especially when changing crtcs (this
the crtc helper would actually take into account, but we don't
implement the encoder->get_crtc callback required to make this work
properly).
So it doesn't even work as advertised. I agree that it would be nice
to do resolution changes on LVDS (and also eDP) whithout blacking the
screen where the panel fitter allows to do that. But imo we should
implement this as a special case a few layers up in the mode set code,
akin to how we already detect simple framebuffer changes (and only
update the required registers with ->mode_set_base).
Until this is all in place, make our lives easier and just rip it out.
Also note that this seems to fix actual bugs with enabling the lvds
output, see:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2012-July/018614.html
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Giacomo Comes <comes@naic.edu>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The issue is that we stale data in the CPU caches, when we come to
swap-out the object, the CPU may short-circuit the reads from those
cacheline and so corrupt the context object.
Secondary, leaving the context object as being marked in the CPU write
domain whilst on the GPU active list is a bad idea and will throw
warnings later.
Note: Thanks to calling set_to_gtt_domain with write = false and not
setting any gpu write domain when putting a context object onto the
active list (when we switch away from it) the set_to_gtt_domain call
won't block.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
[danvet: Added a note to the commit message and a comment in the code
to explain the clever non-blocking trick.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
When we enable/disable the CPU backlight registers we can't forget to
enable/disable the PCH backlight registers. Since we're using the CPU
registers we should also unset the override bit.
Fixes a regression on the following commit:
drm/i915: properly enable the blc controller on the right pipe
The commit just deleted the code that sets the PCH registers, so it
was relying on the values set by the BIOS. I told my BIOS to boot on
the DVI monitor instead of the LVDS panel, so I noticed the bug.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
If we drop the breadcrumb request after a batch due to a signal for
example we aim to fix it up at the next opportunity. In this case we
emit a second batchbuffer with no waits upon the first and so no
opportunity to insert the missing request, so we need to emit the
missing flush for coherency. (Note that that invalidating the render
cache is the same as flushing it, so there should have been no
observable corruption.)
Note that beside simply adding the missing flush, avoiding potential
render corruption, this will also fix at least parts of the problem
introduced by some funny interaction of these two commits:
commit de2b998552
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Wed Jul 4 22:52:50 2012 +0200
drm/i915: don't return a spurious -EIO from intel_ring_begin
which allowed intel_ring_begin to return -ERESTARTSYS and
commit cc889e0f6c
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Wed Jun 13 20:45:19 2012 +0200
drm/i915: disable flushing_list/gpu_write_list
which essentially disabled the flushing list.
The issue happens when we submit a batch & emit it, but get
interrupted (thanks to the first patch) while trying to emit the
flush. On the next batch we still assume that the full gpu domain
handling is in effect and hence compute the invalidate&flushing
domains. But thanks to the 2nd patch we totally ignore these and only
invalidate all gpu domains, presuming that any required flushes have
been issued already. Which is wrong and eventually results in us
updating the new write_domain values with the computed
pending_write_domain values, which leaves an object with write_domain
== 0 on the gpu_write_list.
As soon as we try to unbind that object, things blow up.
Fix this by emitting the missing flush according to the new
ring->gpu_caches_dirty flag.
Note that this does _not_ fix all the current cases where we end up
with an object on the flushing_list that can't be flushed.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52040
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Add bug explanation to commit message.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
While debugging Haswell link train failures I observed that we never
try the maximum voltage configuration more than once consecutively. We
start the training, the monitor keeps telling us to increase the
voltage, then when we reach the maximum we just go back to the start
(because of the "memset" above "voltage_tries = 0"). When we reach
this point, we keep alternating between the maximum and the minimum
voltages until we give up.
The DP spec suggests that we should try the same voltage 5 times
before giving up. This patch makes us try the maximum voltage at
least 5 times before going back to the minimum voltages.
This patch does not fix any particular bug I'm aware of.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We have way too much lying hardware to rely on a simple "does someone
answer on the ddc i2c address?" check. And now it's unused, so just
kill it.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Somehow detect_ddc manages to fall through all checks when we think
that something responds on the ddc i2c address, but the edid read
failed. Fix this up by explicitly checking for this case.
This fixes a regression on newer chips because since
commit aaa377302b
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Sat Jun 16 15:30:32 2012 +0200
drm/i915/crt: Do not rely upon the HPD presence pin
we use ddc detection also on hotplug capable platforms. And one of
these reads all 0s for any i2c transaction if nothing is connected to
the vga port.
v2: Implement Chris Wilson's review:
- simplify logic, default to "nothing detected"
- kill stale comment
- BUG_ON(!crt->type != ANALOG)
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51900
Tested-by: Yang Guang <guang.a.yang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
I so totally suck.
This can cause a black screen if (for whatever reason) the bios
hasn't set this bit itself.
This regression has been introduced in
commit 7cf4160148
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Tue Jun 5 10:07:09 2012 +0200
drm/i915: clear up backlight #define confusion on gen4+
Tested-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Having had to dive into the bspec to understand what each stage of the
workaround meant, and how that the ring broadcasting IDLE corresponded
with the GT powering down the ring (i.e. rc6) add comments to aide
the next reader.
And since the register "is used to control all aspects of PSMI and power
saving functions" that makes it quite interesting to inspect with
regards to RC6 hangs, so add it to the error-state.
v2: Rediscover the piece of magic, set the RNCID to 0 before waiting for
the ring to wake up.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
It never quite worked despite the numerous workarounds, yet I still see
people trying to use this hardware and filing bug reports. As we no
longer even try to implement the workarounds, since 6a233c7887
(drm/i915/ringbuffer: kill snb blt workaround), simply disable the ring.
v2: Add a message to inform the user about the limited capabilities of
their pre-production hardware.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This initializes power wells within the modeset_init_hw routine.
Testing has shown that this works for both driver load time and for
suspend-resume code paths.
Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
There were some fields missed. Daniel pointed this out in review, and I
know I fixed it, but something happened somehow and some time.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
*sigh* the docs had it spelled wrong, corrected it, and then proceeded
to re-do the original error. The original code preserved this history,
and this patch attempts to keep in sync with the current docs.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Userspace uses long in quite a few places more than the kernel. Which
gives me neat proof that I'm the only guy on this side of the galaxy
who ever tried to run glxgears on a 64bit machine with sis graphics on
linux.
Note that the longs in drm_sis_mem_t aren't aligned properly, so this
won't even work with 32bit userspace on 64bit kernel as-is. Hence the
patch can't break that, either.
Nope, I'm not nuts enough to write the 32bit ioctl compat layer for
this and test it with some wine app. Even though hunting the ebay
dungeons for a sis card actually supported by the mesa drivers casts
some doubts on this ...
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Alan Cox
Daniel Vetter
Eric Anholt
Dan Carpenter
Chris Wilson
Paulo Zanoni
Ben Widawsky
Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
Eugeni Dodonov