In current 2.6.23-rc1+git, make bootimage gives the following warnings while
compiling mkbb.c. The patch below fixes these warnings by using the proper
include for exit() and using appropriate printf format.
HOSTCC arch/alpha/boot/tools/mkbb
arch/alpha/boot/tools/mkbb.c: In function 'main':
arch/alpha/boot/tools/mkbb.c:95: warning: implicit declaration of function 'exit'
arch/alpha/boot/tools/mkbb.c:95: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'exit'
arch/alpha/boot/tools/mkbb.c:102: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'exit'
arch/alpha/boot/tools/mkbb.c:110: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'exit'
arch/alpha/boot/tools/mkbb.c:117: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int'
arch/alpha/boot/tools/mkbb.c:118: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'exit'
arch/alpha/boot/tools/mkbb.c:125: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int'
arch/alpha/boot/tools/mkbb.c:126: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'exit'
arch/alpha/boot/tools/mkbb.c:143: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'exit'
arch/alpha/boot/tools/mkbb.c:148: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'exit'
Signed-off-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Cc: Jay Estabrook <jay.estabrook@hp.com>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Revert 7e92b4fc34. It broke Sébastien Dugué's
machine and Jeff said (persuasively)
This seems like it will break decades-long-working stuff, in favor of
breaking new ground in our favorite area, "trusting the BIOS."
It's just not worth it for serial ports, IMO. Serial ports are something
that just shouldn't break at this late stage in the game. My new Intel
platform boxes don't even have serial ports, so I question the value of
messing with serial port probing even more... because... just wait a year,
and your box won't have a serial port either! :)
I certainly don't object to the use of platform devices (or isa_driver),
but the probe change seems questionable. That's sorta analagous to
rewriting the floppy driver probe routine. Sure you could do it... but why
risk all that damage and go through debugging all over again?
It seems clear from this report that we cannot, should not, trust BIOS for
something (a) so simple and (b) that has been working for over a decade.
Much discussion ensued and we've decided to have another go at all of this.
Cc: Sébastien Dugué <sebastien.dugue@bull.net>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
Cc: Sascha Sommer <saschasommer@freenet.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Fix the following section mismatch warnings:
WARNING: o-alpha/vmlinux.o(.text+0x1a4d4): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:free_area_init (between 'paging_init' and 'srm_paging_stop')
WARNING: o-alpha/vmlinux.o(.text+0x1a4dc): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:free_area_init (between 'paging_init' and 'srm_paging_stop')
One instance of paging_init() was declared __init but not the other one -
used by defconfig. Fixed by declaring the second instance ___init too.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
A succesful downcall with a negative result (which indicates that the given
filesystem is not exported to the given user) should not return an error.
Currently mountd is depending on stdio to write these downcalls. With some
versions of libc this appears to cause subsequent writes to attempt to write
all accumulated data (for which writes previously failed) along with any new
data. This can prevent the kernel from seeing responses to later downcalls.
Symptoms will be that nfsd fails to respond to certain requests.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
RFC 3530 says:
If the server uses an attribute to store the exclusive create verifier, it
will signify which attribute by setting the appropriate bit in the attribute
mask that is returned in the results.
Linux uses the atime and mtime to store the verifier, but sends a zeroed out
bitmask back to the client. This patch makes sure that we set the correct
bits in the bitmask in this situation.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Fix kernel-doc warnings in sched.c:
Warning(linux-2623-rc1g4//kernel/sched.c:1685): No description found for parameter 'notifier'
Warning(linux-2623-rc1g4//kernel/sched.c:1696): No description found for parameter 'notifier'
Warning(linux-2623-rc1g4//kernel/sched.c:1750): No description found for parameter 'prev'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Fix PNP docbook warnings:
Warning(linux-2623-rc1g4//drivers/pnp/core.c): no structured comments found
Warning(linux-2623-rc1g4//drivers/pnp/driver.c): no structured comments found
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Yan Zheng wrote:
> I think I found a bug in ext4/extents.c, "ext4_ext_put_in_cache" uses
> "__u32" to receive physical block number. "ext4_ext_put_in_cache" is
> used in "ext4_ext_get_blocks", it sets ext4 inode's extent cache
> according most recently tree lookup (higher 16 bits of saved physical
> block number are always zero). when serving a mapping request,
> "ext4_ext_get_blocks" first check whether the logical block is in
> inode's extent cache. if the logical block is in the cache and the
> cached region isn't a gap, "ext4_ext_get_blocks" gets physical block
> number by using cached region's physical block number and offset in
> the cached region. as described above, "ext4_ext_get_blocks" may
> return wrong result when there are physical block numbers bigger than
> 0xffffffff.
>
You are right. Thanks for reporting this!
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Yan Zheng <yanzheng@21cn.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Meelis Roos
Wyatt Banks
Daniel Ritz
Yoichi Yuasa
Andrew Morton
Stephane Eranian
Alan Cox
Arne Redlich
Maik Hampel
Randy Dunlap
Sam Ravnborg
J. Bruce Fields
Jeff Layton
Mingming Cao
Jeff Dike
Richard Purdie
Jordan Crouse
Grant Likely
Ben Dooks