Prevent an ext4 filesystem from being mounted multiple times.
A sequence number is stored on disk and is periodically updated (every 5
seconds by default) by a mounted filesystem.
At mount time, we now wait for s_mmp_update_interval seconds to make sure
that the MMP sequence does not change.
In case of failure, the nodename, bdevname and the time at which the MMP
block was last updated is displayed.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@whamcloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Johann Lombardi <johann@whamcloud.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
I found the issue that the number of free blocks went negative.
# stat -f /mnt/mp1/
File: "/mnt/mp1/"
ID: e175ccb83a872efe Namelen: 255 Type: ext2/ext3
Block size: 4096 Fundamental block size: 4096
Blocks: Total: 258022 Free: -15 Available: -13122
Inodes: Total: 65536 Free: 63029
f_bfree in struct statfs will go negative when the filesystem has
few free blocks. Because the number of dirty blocks is bigger than
the number of free blocks in the following two cases.
CASE 1:
ext4_da_writepages
mpage_da_map_and_submit
ext4_map_blocks
ext4_ext_map_blocks
ext4_mb_new_blocks
ext4_mb_diskspace_used
percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len);
<--- interrupt statfs systemcall --->
ext4_da_update_reserve_space
percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_dirtyblocks_counter,
used + ei->i_allocated_meta_blocks);
CASE 2:
ext4_write_begin
__block_write_begin
ext4_map_blocks
ext4_ext_map_blocks
ext4_mb_new_blocks
ext4_mb_diskspace_used
percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len);
<--- interrupt statfs systemcall --->
percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_dirtyblocks_counter, reserv_blks);
To avoid the issue, this patch ensures that f_bfree is non-negative.
Signed-off-by: Kazuya Mio <k-mio@sx.jp.nec.com>
We should protect reading bd_info->bb_first_free with the group lock
because otherwise we might miss some free blocks. This is not a big deal
at all, but the change to do right thing is really simple, so lets do
that.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently we are loading buddy ext4_mb_load_buddy() for every block
group we are going through in ext4_trim_fs() in many cases just to find
out that there is not enough space to be bothered with. As Amir Goldstein
suggested we can use bb_free information directly from ext4_group_info.
This commit removes ext4_mb_load_buddy() from ext4_trim_fs() and rather
get the ext4_group_info via ext4_get_group_info() and use the bb_free
information directly from that. This avoids unnecessary call to load
buddy in the case the group does not have enough free space to trim.
Loading buddy is now moved to ext4_trim_all_free().
Tested by me with xfstests 251.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
jbd2__journal_start() returns an ERR_PTR() value rather than NULL on
failure.
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
jbd2_log_start_commit() returns 1 only when we really start a
transaction. But we also need to wait for a transaction when the
commit is already running. Fix this problem by waiting for
transaction commit unconditionally (which is just a quick check if the
transaction is already committed).
Also we have to be more careful with sending of a barrier because when
transaction is being committed in parallel to ext4_sync_file()
running, we cannot be sure that the barrier the journalling code sends
happens after we wrote all the data for fsync (note that not every
data writeout needs to trigger metadata changes thus commit of some
metadata changes can be running while other data is still written
out). So use jbd2_will_send_data_barrier() helper to detect the common
cases when we can be sure barrier will be issued by the commit code
and issue the barrier ourselves in the remaining cases.
Reported-by: Edward Goggin <egoggin@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Provide a function which returns whether a transaction with given tid
will send a flush to the filesystem device. The function will be used
by ext4 to detect whether fsync needs to send a separate flush or not.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
In data=ordered mode, it's theoretically possible (however rare) that
an inode is filed to transaction's t_inode_list and a flusher thread
writes all the data and inode is reclaimed before the transaction
starts to commit. In such a case, we could erroneously omit sending a
flush to file system device when it is different from the journal
device (because data can still be in disk cache only).
Fix the problem by setting a flag in a transaction when some inode is added
to it and then send disk flush in the commit code when the flag is set.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To get delayed-extent information, ext4_ext_fiemap_cb() looks up
pagecache, it thus collects information starting from a page's
head block.
If blocksize < pagesize, the beginning blocks of a page may lies
before the request range. So ext4_ext_fiemap_cb() should proceed
ignoring them, because they has been handled before. If no mapped
buffer in the range is found in the 1st page, we need to look up
the 2nd page, otherwise delayed-extents after a hole will be ignored.
Without this patch, xfstests 225 will hung on ext4 with 1K block.
Reported-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
In commit c8d46e41 (ext4: Add flag to files with blocks intentionally
past EOF), if the EOFBLOCKS_FL flag is set, we call ext4_truncate()
before calling vmtruncate(). This caused any allocated but unwritten
blocks created by calling fallocate() with the FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE
flag to be dropped. This was done to make to make sure that
EOFBLOCKS_FL would not be cleared while still leaving blocks past
i_size allocated. This was not necessary, since ext4_truncate()
guarantees that blocks past i_size will be dropped, even in the case
where truncate() has increased i_size before calling ext4_truncate().
So fix this by removing the EOFBLOCKS_FL special case treatment in
ext4_setattr(). In addition, use truncate_setsize() followed by a
call to ext4_truncate() instead of using vmtruncate(). This is more
efficient since it skips the call to inode_newsize_ok(), which has
been checked already by inode_change_ok(). This is also in a win in
the case where EOFBLOCKS_FL is set since it avoids calling
ext4_truncate() twice.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
t_max_wait is added in commit 8e85fb3f to indicate how long we
were waiting for new transaction to start. In commit 6d0bf005,
it is moved to another function named update_t_max_wait to
avoid a build warning. But the wrong thing is that the original
'ts' is initialized in the start of function start_this_handle
and we can calculate t_max_wait in the right way. while with
this change, ts is initialized within the function and t_max_wait
can never be calculated right.
This patch moves the initialization of ts to the original beginning
of start_this_handle and pass it to function update_t_max_wait so
that it can be calculated right and the build warning is avoided also.
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
ext4_ext_truncate() should not invoke up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem)
when ext4_orphan_add() returns an error, as it hasn't performed a
down_write() yet. This trivial patch fixes this by moving the up_write()
invocation above the out_stop label.
Signed-off-by: Eric Gouriou <egouriou@google.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
The number of hits and misses for each filesystem is exposed in
/sys/fs/ext4/<dev>/extent_cache_{hits, misses}.
Tested: fsstress, manual checks.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Haldar <haldar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
After creating an ext4 file system without a journal:
# mke2fs -t ext4 -O ^has_journal /dev/sda
# mount -t ext4 /dev/sda /test
the /proc/mounts will show:
"/dev/sda /test ext4 rw,relatime,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=writeback 0 0"
which can fool users into thinking that the fs is using writeback mode.
So don't set the writeback option when the journal has not been
enabled; we don't depend on the writeback option being set, since
ext4_should_writeback_data() in ext4_jbd2.h tests to see if the
journal is not present before returning true.
Reported-by: Robin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
We need to take reference to the s_li_request after we take a mutex,
because it might be freed since then, hence result in accessing old
already freed memory. Also we should protect the whole
ext4_remove_li_request() because ext4_li_info might be in the process of
being freed in ext4_lazyinit_thread().
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
For some reason, when we set the mount option "init_itable=0" it
behaves as we would set init_itable=20 which is not right at all.
Basically when we set it to zero we are saying to lazyinit thread not
to wait between zeroing the inode table (except of cond_resched()) so
this commit fixes that and removes the unnecessary condition. The 'n'
should be also properly used on remount.
When the n is not set at all, it means that the default miltiplier
EXT4_DEF_LI_WAIT_MULT is set instead.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
For some reason we have been waiting for lazyinit thread to start in the
ext4_run_lazyinit_thread() but it is not needed since it was jus
unnecessary complexity, so get rid of it. We can also remove li_task and
li_wait_task since it is not used anymore.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
In order to make lazyinit eat approx. 10% of io bandwidth at max, we
are sleeping between zeroing each single inode table. For that purpose
we are using timer which wakes up thread when it expires. It is set
via add_timer() and this may cause troubles in the case that thread
has been woken up earlier and in next iteration we call add_timer() on
still running timer hence hitting BUG_ON in add_timer(). We could fix
that by using mod_timer() instead however we can use
schedule_timeout_interruptible() for waiting and hence simplifying
things a lot.
This commit exchange the old "waiting mechanism" with simple
schedule_timeout_interruptible(), setting the time to sleep. Hence we
do not longer need li_wait_daemon waiting queue and others, so get rid
of it.
Addresses-Red-Hat-Bugzilla: #699708
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
In order to stabilize pages during disk writes, ext4_page_mkwrite must
wait for writeback operations to complete before making a page
writable. Furthermore, the function must return locked pages, and
recheck the writeback status if the page lock is ever dropped. The
"someone could wander in" part of this patch was suggested by Chris
Mason.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
wait_on_page_writeback already checks the writeback bit, so callers of it
needn't do that test.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently, if we mkfs a new ext4 volume with s_max_mnt_count set to
zero, and mount it for the first time, we will get the warning:
maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck is recommended
It is really misleading. So change the check so that it won't warn in
that case.
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
This patch addresses bugs found while testing punch hole
with the fsx test. The patch corrects the number of blocks
that are zeroed out while splitting an extent, and also corrects
the return value to return the number of blocks split out, instead
of the number of blocks zeroed out.
This patch has been tested in addition to the following patches:
[Ext4 punch hole v7]
[XFS Tests Punch Hole 1/1 v2] Add Punch Hole Testing to FSX
The test ran successfully for 24 hours.
Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <achender@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
If quota is not enabled when ext4_quota_off() is called, we must not
dereference quota file inode since it is NULL. Check properly for
this.
This fixes a bug in commit 21f976975c (ext4: remove unnecessary
[cm]time update of quota file), which was merged for 2.6.39-rc3.
Reported-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net>
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Aditya Kali
Johann Lombardi
Kazuya Mio
Lukas Czerner
Eryu Guan
Jan Kara
Yongqiang Yang
Theodore Ts'o
Tao Ma
Eric Gouriou
Vivek Haldar
Darrick J. Wong
Allison Henderson
Amir Goldstein