AMBA devices may on some SoCs resides in PM domains. To be able to
manage these devices from there, let's try to attach devices to their
corresponding PM domain during the probe phase.
To reverse these actions at the remove phase, we try to detach the
device from its PM domain.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Previously only the ACPI PM domain was supported by the spi bus.
Let's convert to the common attach/detach functions for PM domains,
which currently means we are extending the support to include the
generic PM domain as well.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Previously only the ACPI PM domain was supported by the sdio bus.
Let's convert to the common attach/detach functions for PM domains,
which currently means we are extending the support to include the
generic PM domain as well.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Previously only the ACPI PM domain was supported by the i2c bus.
Let's convert to the common attach/detach functions for PM domains,
which currently means we are extending the support to include the
generic PM domain as well.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Previously only the ACPI PM domain was supported by the platform bus.
Let's convert to the common attach/detach functions for PM domains,
which currently means we are extending the support to include the
generic PM domain as well.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
To maintain scalability let's add common methods to attach and detach
a PM domain for a device, dev_pm_domain_attach|detach().
Typically dev_pm_domain_attach() shall be invoked from subsystem level
code at the probe phase to try to attach a device to its PM domain.
The reversed actions may be done a the remove phase and then by
invoking dev_pm_domain_detach().
When attachment succeeds, the attach function should assign its
corresponding detach function to a new ->detach() callback added in the
struct dev_pm_domain.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This patch introduces generic code to perform PM domain look-up using
device tree and automatically bind devices to their PM domains.
Generic device tree bindings are introduced to specify PM domains of
devices in their device tree nodes.
Backwards compatibility with legacy Samsung-specific PM domain bindings
is provided, but for now the new code is not compiled when
CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS is selected to avoid collision with legacy code.
This will change as soon as the Exynos PM domain code gets converted to
use the generic framework in further patch.
This patch was originally submitted by Tomasz Figa when he was employed
by Samsung.
Link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=139955349702152&w=2
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
As as preparation to simplify the detachment of devices from their PM
domains, we assign the ->detach() callback to genpd_dev_pm_detach().
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The intent of this callback is to simplify detachment of devices from
their PM domains. Further patches will show the benefit.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There are currently no need to export default_stop_ok() as an API,
instead let's keep it local to the PM domain governor.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Since genpd at late init, will try to disable unused PM domains we
don't need to do it from the machine specific code as well.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Since genpd at late init, will try to disable unused PM domains we
don't need to do it from here as well.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There are no active users of this API. Let's remove it and if future
needs shows up we could consider to have a get/put API instead.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The pm_genpd_syscore_poweroff() API and pm_genpd_syscore_poweron() API
makes the pm_genpd_syscore_switch() API redundant.
Moreover, since there are no active users, let's just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The genpd dev_irq_safe configuration somewhat overlaps with the runtime
PM pm_runtime_irq_safe() option. Also, currently genpd don't have a
good way to deal with these device. So, until we figured out if and how
to support this in genpd, let's remove the option to configure it.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The dev_irq_safe configuration is redundant, genpd don't have any
special treatmeant for handling it. Let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The dev_irq_safe configuration is redundant, genpd don't have any
special treatmeant for handling it. Let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tomasz Figa
Ulf Hansson
Geert Uytterhoeven