Instead of open-coding getting minimal value of two, just use min macro.
That is why it is there for. While changing the function also change
type of batch local variable to match type of per_cpu_pages::batch
(which is int).
Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
In store_mem_state(), we have:
...
334 else if (!strncmp(buf, "offline", min_t(int, count, 7)))
335 online_type = -1;
...
355 case -1:
356 ret = device_offline(&mem->dev);
357 break;
...
Here, "offline" is hard coded as -1.
This patch does the following renaming:
ONLINE_KEEP -> MMOP_ONLINE_KEEP
ONLINE_KERNEL -> MMOP_ONLINE_KERNEL
ONLINE_MOVABLE -> MMOP_ONLINE_MOVABLE
and introduces MMOP_OFFLINE = -1 to avoid hard coding.
Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We use the following command to online a memory_block:
echo online|online_kernel|online_movable > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/state
But, if we do the following:
echo online_fhsjkghfkd > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/state
the block will also be onlined.
This is because the following code in store_mem_state() does not compare
the whole string, but only the prefix of the string.
store_mem_state()
{
......
328 if (!strncmp(buf, "online_kernel", min_t(int, count, 13)))
Here, only compare the first 13 letters of the string. If we give "online_kernelXXXXXX",
it will be recognized as online_kernel, which is incorrect.
329 online_type = ONLINE_KERNEL;
330 else if (!strncmp(buf, "online_movable", min_t(int, count, 14)))
We have the same problem here,
331 online_type = ONLINE_MOVABLE;
332 else if (!strncmp(buf, "online", min_t(int, count, 6)))
here,
(Here is more problematic. If we give online_movalbe, which is a typo
of online_movable, it will be recognized as online without noticing the
author.)
333 online_type = ONLINE_KEEP;
334 else if (!strncmp(buf, "offline", min_t(int, count, 7)))
and here.
335 online_type = -1;
336 else {
337 ret = -EINVAL;
338 goto err;
339 }
......
}
This patch fixes this problem by using sysfs_streq() to compare the
whole string.
Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reported-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Use ACCESS_ONCE() in handle_pte_fault() when getting the entry or
orig_pte upon which all subsequent decisions and pte_same() tests will
be made.
I have no evidence that its lack is responsible for the mm/filemap.c:202
BUG_ON(page_mapped(page)) in __delete_from_page_cache() found by
trinity, and I am not optimistic that it will fix it. But I have found
no other explanation, and ACCESS_ONCE() here will surely not hurt.
If gcc does re-access the pte before passing it down, then that would be
disastrous for correct page fault handling, and certainly could explain
the page_mapped() BUGs seen (concurrent fault causing page to be mapped
in a second time on top of itself: mapcount 2 for a single pte).
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Richard Yao reported a month ago that his system have a trouble with
vmap_area_lock contention during performance analysis by /proc/meminfo.
Andrew asked why his analysis checks /proc/meminfo stressfully, but he
didn't answer it.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/10/416
Although I'm not sure that this is right usage or not, there is a
solution reducing vmap_area_lock contention with no side-effect. That
is just to use rcu list iterator in get_vmalloc_info().
rcu can be used in this function because all RCU protocol is already
respected by writers, since Nick Piggin commit db64fe0225 ("mm:
rewrite vmap layer") back in linux-2.6.28
Specifically :
insertions use list_add_rcu(),
deletions use list_del_rcu() and kfree_rcu().
Note the rb tree is not used from rcu reader (it would not be safe),
only the vmap_area_list has full RCU protection.
Note that __purge_vmap_area_lazy() already uses this rcu protection.
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(va, &vmap_area_list, list) {
if (va->flags & VM_LAZY_FREE) {
if (va->va_start < *start)
*start = va->va_start;
if (va->va_end > *end)
*end = va->va_end;
nr += (va->va_end - va->va_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
list_add_tail(&va->purge_list, &valist);
va->flags |= VM_LAZY_FREEING;
va->flags &= ~VM_LAZY_FREE;
}
}
rcu_read_unlock();
Peter:
: While rcu list traversal over the vmap_area_list is safe, this may
: arrive at different results than the spinlocked version. The rcu list
: traversal version will not be a 'snapshot' of a single, valid instant
: of the entire vmap_area_list, but rather a potential amalgam of
: different list states.
Joonsoo:
: Yes, you are right, but I don't think that we should be strict here.
: Meminfo is already not a 'snapshot' at specific time. While we try to get
: certain stats, the other stats can change. And, although we may arrive at
: different results than the spinlocked version, the difference would not be
: large and would not make serious side-effect.
[edumazet@google.com: add more commit description]
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Reported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei.yes@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The return statement goes with the cmpxchg_double() condition so it needs
to be indented another tab.
Also these days the fashion is to line function parameters up, and it
looks nicer that way because then the "freelist_new" is not at the same
indent level as the "return 1;".
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When a kmem_cache is created with ctor, each object in the kmem_cache
will be initialized before ready to use. While in slub implementation,
the first object will be initialized twice.
This patch reduces the duplication of initialization of the first
object.
Fix commit 7656c72b ("SLUB: add macros for scanning objects in a slab").
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Now, there is no code to hold two lock simultaneously, since we don't
call slab_destroy() with holding any lock. So, lockdep annotation is
useless now. Remove it.
v2: don't remove BAD_ALIEN_MAGIC in this patch. It will be removed
in the following patch.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
I haven't heard that this alien cache lock is contended, but to reduce
chance of contention would be better generally. And with this change,
we can simplify complex lockdep annotation in slab code. In the
following patch, it will be implemented.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Currently, we use array_cache for alien_cache. Although they are mostly
similar, there is one difference, that is, need for spinlock. We don't
need spinlock for array_cache itself, but to use array_cache for
alien_cache, array_cache structure should have spinlock. This is
needless overhead, so removing it would be better. This patch prepare
it by introducing alien_cache and using it. In the following patch, we
remove spinlock in array_cache.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Joonsoo Kim
Fabian Frederick
Michal Nazarewicz
Tang Chen
Hugh Dickins
Andrew Morton
Joe Perches
Gu Zheng
Dan Carpenter
Wang Sheng-Hui
Andrey Ryabinin
Wei Yang