Simplify the oneshot logic by avoiding the reprogramming loops. That
also allows to call the cpu local handler outside of the
broadcast_lock held region.
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
With the removal of the hrtimer softirq the switch to highres/nohz
mode happens in the tick interrupt. That leads to a livelock when the
per cpu event handler is directly called from the broadcast handler
under broadcast lock because broadcast lock needs to be taken for the
highres/nohz switch as well.
Solve this by calling the cpu local handler outside the broadcast_lock
held region.
Fixes: c6eb3f70d4 "hrtimer: Get rid of hrtimer softirq"
Reported-and-tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The return value of hrtimer_start() tells whether the timer was
inactive or active already when hrtimer_start() was called.
The code emits a bogus warning if the timer was active already
claiming that the timer could not be started.
Remove it along with the bogus comment in the else path.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Frans Klaver <frans.klaver@xsens.com>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Thomas stumbled over the hrtimer_forward_now() in
perf_event_mux_interval_ms_store() and noticed its broken-ness.
You cannot just change the expiry time of an active timer, it will
destroy the red-black tree order and cause havoc.
Change it to (re)start the timer instead, (re)starting a timer will
dequeue and enqueue a timer and therefore preserve rb-tree order.
Since we cannot enqueue remotely, wrap the thing in
cpu_function_call(), this however mandates that we restrict ourselves
to online cpus. Also serialize the entire setting so we don't get
multiple concurrent threads trying to update to different values.
Also fix a problem in perf_mux_hrtimer_restart(), checking against
hrtimer_active() can actually loose us the timer when timer->state ==
HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK and the callback has already decided NORESTART.
Furthermore it doesn't make any sense to test
hrtimer_callback_running() when we already tested hrtimer_active(),
but with the above change, we explicitly must call it when
callback_running.
Lastly, rename a few functions:
s/perf_cpu_hrtimer_/perf_mux_hrtimer_/ -- because I could not find
the mux timer function
s/\<hr\>/timer/ -- because that's the normal way of calling things.
Fixes: 62b8563979 ("perf: Add sysfs entry to adjust multiplexing interval per PMU")
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150415095011.863052571@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Roman reported a 3 cpu lockup scenario involving __start_cfs_bandwidth().
The more I look at that code the more I'm convinced its crack, that
entire __start_cfs_bandwidth() thing is brain melting, we don't need to
cancel a timer before starting it, *hrtimer_start*() will happily remove
the timer for you if its still enqueued.
Removing that, removes a big part of the problem, no more ugly cancel
loop to get stuck in.
So now, if I understand things right, the entire reason you have this
cfs_b->lock guarded ->timer_active nonsense is to make sure we don't
accidentally lose the timer.
It appears to me that it should be possible to guarantee that same by
unconditionally (re)starting the timer when !queued. Because regardless
what hrtimer::function will return, if we beat it to (re)enqueue the
timer, it doesn't matter.
Now, because hrtimers don't come with any serialization guarantees we
must ensure both handler and (re)start loop serialize their access to
the hrtimer to avoid both trying to forward the timer at the same
time.
Update the rt bandwidth timer to match.
This effectively reverts: 09dc4ab039 ("sched/fair: Fix
tg_set_cfs_bandwidth() deadlock on rq->lock").
Reported-by: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150415095011.804589208@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Because we drop cpu_base->lock around calling hrtimer::function, it is
possible for hrtimer_start() to come in between and enqueue the timer.
If hrtimer::function then returns HRTIMER_RESTART we'll hit the BUG_ON
because HRTIMER_STATE_ENQUEUED will be set.
Since the above is a perfectly valid scenario, remove the BUG_ON and
make the enqueue_hrtimer() call conditional on the timer not being
enqueued already.
NOTE: in that concurrent scenario its entirely common for both sites
to want to modify the hrtimer, since hrtimers don't provide
serialization themselves be sure to provide some such that the
hrtimer::function and the hrtimer_start() caller don't both try and
fudge the expiration state at the same time.
To that effect, add a WARN when someone tries to forward an already
enqueued timer, the most common way to change the expiry of self
restarting timers. Ideally we'd put the WARN in everything modifying
the expiry but most of that is inlines and we don't need the bloat.
Fixes: 2d44ae4d71 ("hrtimer: clean up cpu->base locking tricks")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150415113105.GT5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
We can do a lockless check for hrtimer_active before actually taking
the lock in hrtimer[_try_to]_cancel. This is useful for hotpath users
like nanosleep as they avoid the lock dance when the timer has
expired.
This is safe because active is true when the timer is enqueued or the
callback is running. Taking the hrtimer base lock does not protect
against concurrent hrtimer_start calls, the callsite has to do the
proper serialization itself.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203503.580273114@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Maxime Ripard
Preeti U Murthy
Thomas Gleixner
kbuild test robot
Peter Zijlstra