The logic behind normal and syndrome ECC handling is pretty much the same,
the only difference is the ECC bytes placement.
Create two functions to read/write ECC chunks. Those functions will later
be used by the sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read/write_page() and
sunxi_nfc_hw_syndrome_ecc_read/write_page() functions.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
The code used to enable/disable the hardware ECC engine is repeated in a
lot of places. Create two functions to avoid code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
The ->init_size() hook was introduced to let NAND controller drivers
support NAND devices that could not be described in the nand_ids table.
Since then, the core has added support for extended-id parsing and
full-id description, thus allowing to describe pretty much all existing
NANDs.
Moreover, this hook is not used by any mainline driver, and should not be
used by new drivers, because detecting the NAND chip is not something
controller specific.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
These really aren't needed, especially now that we embed the soc struct
in our private struct, so we can stash things there if needed.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
This must have been implicitly included on the builds I tested. Reported
by numerous test bots:
drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c: In function 'vf610_nfc_resume':
drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c:660:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pinctrl_pm_select_default_state' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev);
^
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
If we fail to allocate a partition structure in the middle of the partition
creation process, the already allocated partitions are never removed, which
means they are still present in the partition list and their resources are
never freed.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
This reverts commit 7827e3acad.
There are some 64-bit arithmetic issues on some architectures, so let's
wait until we get a better patch for this.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
This adds hardware ECC support using the BCH encoder in the NFC IP.
The ECC encoder supports up to 32-bit correction by using 60 error
correction bytes. There is no sub-page ECC step, ECC is calculated
always across the whole page (up to 2k pages).
Limitations:
- HW ECC: Only 2K page with 64+ OOB.
- HW ECC: Only 24 and 32-bit error correction implemented.
Raw writes have been tested using the generic nand_write_page_raw
implementation. However, raw reads are currently not possible
because the controller need to know whether we are going to use
the ECC mode already at NAND_CMD_READ0 command time. At this point
we do not have the information whether it is a raw read or a
regular read at driver level...
Signed-off-by: Bill Pringlemeir <bpringlemeir@nbsps.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
This driver supports Freescale NFC (NAND flash controller) found on
Vybrid (VF610), MPC5125, MCF54418 and Kinetis K70. The driver has
been tested using 8-bit and 16-bit NAND interface on the ARM based
Vybrid SoC VF500 and VF610 platform.
parameter page reading.
Limitations:
- Untested on MPC5125 and M54418.
- DMA and pipelining not used.
- 2K pages or less.
- No chip select, one NAND chip per controller.
- No hardware ECC.
Some paths have been hand-optimized and evaluated by measurements
made using mtd_speedtest.ko on a 100MB MTD partition.
Colibri VF50
eb write % eb read % page write % page read %
rel/opt 5175 11537 4560 11039
opt 5164 -0.21 11420 -1.01 4737 +3.88 10918 -1.10
none 5113 -1.20 11352 -1.60 4490 -1.54 10865 -1.58
Colibri VF61
eb write % eb read % page write % page read %
rel/opt 5766 13096 5459 12846
opt 5883 +2.03 13064 -0.24 5561 +1.87 12802 -0.34
none 5701 -1.13 12980 -0.89 5488 +0.53 12735 -0.86
rel = using readl_relaxed/writel_relaxed in optimized paths
opt = hand-optimized by combining multiple accesses into one read/write
The measurements have not been statistically verfied, hence use them
with care. The author came to the conclusion that using the relaxed
variants of readl/writel are not worth the additional code.
Signed-off-by: Bill Pringlemeir <bpringlemeir@nbsps.com>
Tested-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@3adev.fr>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
After a bit of poking around wondering why my 32-bit user-space can't
seem to send a proper ioctl(BLKPG) to an MTD on my 64-bit kernel
(ARM64), I noticed that struct blkpg_ioctl_arg is actually pretty
unsuitable for use in the ioctl() ABI, due to its use of raw pointers,
and its lack of alignment/packing restrictions (32-bit arch'es tend to
pack the 4 fields into 4 32-bit words, whereas 64-bit arch'es would add
padding after the third int, and make this 6 32-bit words).
Anyway, this means BLKPG deserves some special compat_ioctl handling. Do
the conversion in a small shim for MTD.
block/compat_ioctl.c already has compat support for the block subsystem,
but it does so by a re-marshalling data to/from user-space (see
compat_blkpg_ioctl()). Personally, I think this approach is cleaner.
Tested only on MTD, with an ARM32 user space on an ARM64 kernel.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
This patch fixes timeout issues seen on large NOR flash (e.g., 16MB
w25q128fw) when using ioctl(MEMERASE) with offset=0 and length=16M. The
input parameters matter because spi_nor_erase() uses a different code
path for full-chip erase, where we use the SPINOR_OP_CHIP_ERASE (0xc7)
opcode.
Fix: use a different timeout for full-chip erase than for other
commands.
While most operations can be expected to perform relatively similarly
across a variety of NOR flash types and sizes (and therefore might as
well use a similar timeout to keep things simple), full-chip erase is
unique, because the time it typically takes to complete:
(1) is much larger than most operations and
(2) scales with the size of the flash.
Let's base our timeout on the original comments stuck here -- that a 2MB
flash requires max 40s to erase.
Small survey of a few flash datasheets I have lying around:
Chip Size (MB) Max chip erase (seconds)
---- -------- ------------------------
w25q32fw 4 50
w25q64cv 8 30
w25q64fw 8 100
w25q128fw 16 200
s25fl128s 16 ~256
s25fl256s 32 ~512
From this data, it seems plenty sufficient to say we need to wait for
40 seconds for each 2MB of flash.
After this change, it might make some sense to decrease the timeout for
everything else, as even the most extreme operations (single block
erase?) shouldn't take more than a handful of seconds. But for safety,
let's leave it as-is. It's only an error case, after all, so we don't
exactly need to optimize it.
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
The module pcmciamtd doesn't generate a mtd node for PRETEC 4MB SRAM
cards without the id and hash added to pcmciamtd.c
Tested on 3 different 4MB pretec sram cards.
Signed-off-by: Tom Englund <tomenglund26@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Read Denali hardware revision number and use it to
calculate max_banks, The encoding of max_banks changed
in Denali revision 5.1.
Signed-off-by: Graham Moore <grmoore@opensource.altera.com>
[Brian: parentheses around macro arg]
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
A read id operation followed by 0x00 reads the device ID while
a read id operation followed by 0x20 reads the possible ONFI identifier.
As the READID function did not propagate the second id parameter but had
a hard-coded call for 0x90 0x00, reading the ONFI identifier was not
possible and thus chips werde not detected (tested with
MT29F8G08ABABAWP)
Signed-off-by: Enrico Jorns <ejo@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>