Two flags exist to decide whether a device is writeable or not. None of
those two flags is checked for independently, so they are clearly redundant,
if not an invitation to bugs. This patch removed both of them, replacing
them with a single new flag.
Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@wh.fh-wedel.de>
We'll be using a proper list of nodes in the jffs2_xattr_datum and
jffs2_xattr_ref structures, because the existing code to overwrite
them is just broken. Put it in the common part at the front of the
structure which is shared with the jffs2_inode_cache, so that the
jffs2_link_node_ref() function can do the right thing.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
In a couple of places, we assume that what's at the end of the
->next_in_ino list is a struct jffs2_inode_cache. Let's check
for that, since we expect it to change soon.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Let's avoid the potential for forgetting to set ref->next_in_ino, by doing
it within jffs2_link_node_ref() instead.
This highlights the ugliness of what we're currently doing with
xattr_datum and xattr_ref structures -- we should find a nicer way of
dealing with that.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
When filing REF_OBSOLETE nodes, we'd add their size to the global
'dirty_size' count, but then to the eraseblock's 'used_size' count.
That's not clever.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
The previous code wouldn't work correctly on architectures which have a
non-empty MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX, and this version is neater if slightly
less optimal in the built-in case.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
The patch below adds support for the NAND device on the Amstrad Delta.
This is a 32MiB 8bit Toshiba device, with the data bus connected to the
OMAP MPUIO pins and ALE, CLE, NCE, NRE, NWE and NWP all connected to the
Delta's latch2 16bit latch.
Signed-Off-By: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Well, almost. We'll actually keep a 'TEST_TOTLEN' macro set for now, and keep
doing some paranoia checks to make sure it's all working correctly. But if
TEST_TOTLEN is unset, the size of struct jffs2_raw_node_ref drops from 16
bytes to 12 on 32-bit machines. That's a saving of about half a megabyte of
memory on the OLPC prototype board, with 125K or so nodes in its 512MiB of
flash.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
We can't use jffs2_scan_dirty_space() because it doesn't do any locking; it's
only for use at scan time -- hence the 'scan' in the name.
Also, don't allocate refs while we have c->erase_completion_lock held.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
We don't allocate this locally any more -- it's given to us and owner by
our caller. Also improve the debug messages a little.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Next step in ongoing campaign to file a struct jffs2_raw_node_ref for every
piece of dirty space in the system, so that __totlen can be killed off....
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
If __totlen is going away, we need to pass the length in separately.
Also stop callers from needlessly setting ref->next_phys to NULL,
since that's done for them... and since that'll also be going away soon.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Make sure we allocate a ref for any dirty space which exists between nodes
which we find in an eraseblock summary.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
The incoming ref_totlen() calculation is going to rely on the existence
of nodes which cover all dirty space. We can't just tweak the accounting
data any more; we have to call jffs2_scan_dirty_space() to do it.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To eliminate the __totlen field from struct jffs2_raw_node_ref, we need
to allocate nodes for dirty space instead of just tweaking the accounting
data. Introduce jffs2_scan_dirty_space() in preparation for that.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
For RWCOMPAT and ROCOMPAT nodes, we should still allow the mount to
succeed. Just abandon the summary and fall through to the full scan.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
If we had to allocate extra space for the summary node, we weren't
correctly freeing it when jffs2_sum_scan_sumnode() returned nonzero --
which is both the success and the failure case. Only when it returned
zero, which means fall through to the full scan, were we correctly freeing
the buffer.
Document the meaning of those return codes while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
We should preserve these when we come to garbage collect them, not let
them get erased. Use jffs2_garbage_collect_pristine() for this, and make
sure the summary code copes -- just refrain from writing a summary for any
block which contains a node we don't understand.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
The same sequence of code was repeated in many places, to add a new
struct jffs2_raw_node_ref to an eraseblock and adjust the space accounting
accordingly. Move it out-of-line.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Joern Engel
David Woodhouse
Jonathan McDowell