The L2CAP socket structure does not contain the address information
anymore. They need to be accessed through the L2CAP channel.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The L2CAP socket structure does not contain the address information
anymore. They need to be accessed through the L2CAP channel.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The L2CAP sockets can use BR/EDR public, LE public and LE random
addresses for various combinations of source and destination
devices. So make sure that getsockname(), getpeername() and
accept() return the correct address type.
For this the address type of the source and destination is stored
with the L2CAP channel information. The stored address type is
not the one specific for the HCI protocol. It is the address
type used for the L2CAP sockets and the management interface.
The underlying HCI connections store the HCI address type. If
needed, it gets converted to the socket address type.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
With the effort of abstracting the L2CAP socket from the underlying
L2CAP channel it is important to store the source and destination
address information directly in the L2CAP channel structure.
Direct access to the HCI connection address information is not
possible since they might not be avaiable at L2CAP channel
creation time. The address information will be updated when
the underlying BR/EDR or LE connection status changes.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
When having LE connections, the source address is not always the
public address of the controller. So update the socket address
based on the actual used source address of the HCI connection.
This also remove the pointless source address pointer and adds
a proper lock around the socket structure.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The SMP source code has a few coding style violations. Fix them up
all at once. No actual code has changed.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The smp_c1() so far always assumed public addresses as input for its
operation. However it should provide actually the source address type
of the actual connection.
Finally the source address type is tracked in hci_conn->src_type and
so use that one as input.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The source address is now stored in hci_conn->src and so use that
one for L2CAP functions.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The source address is now stored in hci_conn->src and so use that
one for SMP functions.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The incoming LE connections do not have a proper source address and
address type set. The connection needs to be set with the same values
as used for advertising parameters.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The source addressed was based on the public address of the HCI device,
but with LE connections this not always the case. For example single
mode LE-only controllers would use a static random address. And this
address is configured by userspace.
To not complicate the lookup of what kind of address is in use, store
the correct source address for each HCI connection.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
When establishing LE connections, it is possible to use a public
address (if available) or a random address. The type of address
is only known when creating connections, so make sure it is
stored in hci_conn structure.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The bdaddr_to_le() function tries to convert the internal address
type to one that matches the HCI address type for LE. It does not
handle any address types not used by LE and in the end just make
the code a lot harder to read.
So instead of just hiding behind a magic function, just convert
the internal address type where it needs to be converted. And it
turns out that these are only two cases anyway. One when creating
new LE connections and the other when loading the long term keys.
In both cases this makes it more clear on what it going on.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The l2cap_conn->src and l2cap_conn->dst pointers are no longer in use
and so just remove them.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The l2cap_conn->src and l2cap_conn->dst addresses are just a pointers
to hci_conn structure. Use hci_conn->hdev->bdaddr and hci_conn->dst
directly instead.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The l2cap_conn->src and l2cap_conn->dst addresses are just a pointer
to hci_conn->hdev->bdaddr and hci_conn->dst structures. Use the data
provided by hci_conn directly. This is done for hci_conn->dst_type
already anyway and with this change it makes it a lot clearer were
the address information comes from.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The l2cap_conn->dst address is just a pointer into the hci_conn->dst
structure. Use hci_conn->dst directly instead.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The unicast connectionless data reception feature is actually support
and has been supported all along. Mark it as supported in the L2CAP
features bitmask.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The implementation actually supports the L2CAP connectionless data
channel. So set it as supported in the fixed channels bitmask.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The PSM 0x0021 is dedicated to the 3D profile and has permission to
use security mode 4 level 0 for L2CAP connectionless unicast data
transfers.
When establishing a L2CAP connectionless channel on PSM 0x0021, it
will no longer force Secure Simple Pairing.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The exception for certain PSM channels when it comes to security
mode 4 level 0 should only be checked when actually a connection
oriented channel is established.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The put_unaligned() for setting the PSM is missing the (__le16 *)
cast. Without this, the PSM information transmitted over the air
are bogus.
In addition, print the used PSM value in the debug message so this
becomes easier to debug in the future.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The 1st generation of BlueFRITZ! devices from AVM Berlin pretend
to be HCI version 1.2 controllers, but they are not. They are simple
Bluetooth 1.1 devices.
Since this company never created any newer controllers, it is safe
to use the manufacturer ID instead of an USB quirk.
< HCI Command: Read Page Scan Activity (0x03|0x001b) plen 0
> HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 8
Read Page Scan Activity (0x03|0x001b) ncmd 1
Status: Success (0x00)
Interval: 1280.000 msec (0x0800)
Window: 21.250 msec (0x0022)
< HCI Command: Read Page Scan Type (0x03|0x0046) plen 0
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
Read Page Scan Type (0x03|0x0046) ncmd 1
Status: Unknown HCI Command (0x01)
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
When adding support for MGMT_OP_SET_SCAN_PARAMS command the addition
to the supported commands list has been forgotten. This is needed
for userspace to detect if the command is supported or not.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
It is not allowed to enable high speed support when Secure Simple
Pairing is not available or disabled.
However the support for high speed gets advertised on a controller
that does not even support Secure Simple Pairing. Since there is
no way to enable high speed support on such a controller, do not
even advertise its support.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Marcel Holtmann